0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
August 13, 2010, 11:48:20 PM
@mjj_fan  

Are you still around? I've got a question for you (or whoever can help me out) about Brain swelling/ Brain Edema/ Cerebral edema (IDK what's the right name in english). It's gonna sound dumb and senseless, but I swear there's a "why" for the question, LOL.

So, it's not like you keep on doing your stuff having cerebral edema, I mean, there's no thing such as "Chronic Cerebral Edema", it's always "Acute", right? (I'm talking about active and apparently healthy people going on with their everyday lifes, not patients in ICU, of course).

To make it short, the 'brain swelling' that Neuropathology found is something the patient got Peri-Mortem, right?

PS: This is not the question I've got, but I need to know this before I make it.

Thank you very much!  :D
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"Won't you just let me be?..."

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
August 25, 2010, 03:30:41 PM
Hi
      Just log in , yeah there is No chronic cerebral edma,unless patient suffers hydocephalus which  rarely runs a  chronic course but not as alone -entity .
 cerebral edma is MOSTLY acute, 99% of the time ,cerebral edma  can be a post matum finding too  but  in alive patient , presented with, projectile vomiting , severe headache etc etc.....
 
baseline , he didnt suffer from cerebral edma , atleast in life, hope that helps take care .

 @ mj 291958
P.s  why you thought its a silly question ?not at all ,  you keep an open mind for any possibility and its great you know I think you must be brilliant student in the past  !
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
August 26, 2010, 04:40:22 AM
In the search at Carolwood almost 40 tubes of benoquin and hyrdoquinone were found. Common in the treatment of vitiligo. From what I have read about vitiligo and benoquin treatment - the treatment period usually lasts about 4 months.  I can't remember where I read that someone was very concerned about getting those out of the house. Why if it's common treatment? Benoquin is PERMANENT in the 4 month treatment period. Is it necessary to continue treatment for over 15 years? Or did someone else need to become "paper white"?  Any dermatologist out there that could comment?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
September 10, 2010, 12:33:02 AM
Quote from: "mjj_fan"
Hi
      Just log in , yeah there is No chronic cerebral edma,unless patient suffers hydocephalus which  rarely runs a  chronic course but not as alone -entity .
 cerebral edma is MOSTLY acute, 99% of the time ,cerebral edma  can be a post matum finding too but  in alive patient , presented with, projectile vomiting , severe headache etc etc.....
 
baseline , he didnt suffer from cerebral edma , atleast in life, hope that helps take care .

 @ mj 291958
P.s  why you thought its a silly question ?not at all ,  you keep an open mind for any possibility and its great you know I think you must be brilliant student in the past  !

I missed your reply, I'm sorry. There's no need for me to make you the question anymore, because you already answered it in your post!  :D  Thank You!  :D
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"Won't you just let me be?..."

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
September 12, 2010, 10:35:05 PM
Some one from this forum  paste a page to me from another forum what i had said about the original poster
thankyou for opening my eyes . Let me  make myself very clear  i  didnt try to debunk the report , I simply tried to point out  few mistake he/she made  because it was confusing everyone and among you were few members asking  me my opinion about the original  post , But it sadden me deeply how people judge someone , if some one would read the thread from the very beginning only then they will realise what i was trying to say , MY ONLY PURPOSE FOR WRITING THIS POST WAS TO LET YOU ALL KNOW THAT THE ORIGINAL POSTER WAS GIVING YOU FALSE HOPES by saying this report is FAKE,just because  she consult from professior doesnt mean she is right  , what about the person who has spent life with professiors and is in the medical field  for years ? do you honestly think a layman can stand up and judge a physician by saying"" who is she and what is she ?   I dont agree  with what she said because it doesnt MAKE SENSE TO  me  " just because he/she didnt hear didnt read that FROM SOMEWHERE  doesnt means things they dont make sense orthose things donot exist . DO SOME DECENT RESEARCH
  anyways I know some people are and will always be like that I can only  feel sorry for them .instead of keeping an open mind they want to live in denial , good for them
   For rest of people thankyou for showing respect and love , I will miss some wonderful members I met  .You are and will always be in my prayers . Godbless .
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
September 12, 2010, 11:31:48 PM
Quote from: "ndrew"
In the search at Carolwood almost 40 tubes of benoquin and hyrdoquinone were found. Common in the treatment of vitiligo. From what I have read about vitiligo and benoquin treatment - the treatment period usually lasts about 4 months.  I can't remember where I read that someone was very concerned about getting those out of the house. Why if it's common treatment? Benoquin is PERMANENT in the 4 month treatment period. Is it necessary to continue treatment for over 15 years? Or did someone else need to become "paper white"?  Any dermatologist out there that could comment?

I have also read that this treatment is permanent.....don't know why those tubes are there???

I have a question also about vitiligo.  Everything I have read says it affects every pigment area of the body......including inside the mouth and hair color.  The AR states the hair was brown.  I have more than enough evidence/clues to know MJ is alive......I just find this interesting.  Thoughts?

Blessings Always
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

RunFaYaLife

  • Guest
Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
January 14, 2011, 02:50:38 AM
What about the blue feet?
I did nor read that anywhere in the autopsy report...what would cause that?

[if I missed the answer I'm sorry it is really late here]
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

paula-c

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
February 13, 2011, 12:53:22 PM
A person needs 7 to 8 hours of sleep for a daily to rest well,..as somebody is going to be receiving anesthesia during both time every day?,..madness.. :?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

*

Grace

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
February 13, 2011, 01:48:36 PM
Yes Paula, and after having slept, a male body will have grown some millimeter of hairs that need a good shave... I did not see a single hair requiring a shave on the face on that "high noon" picture. That face looked more like a just bathed baby breast than "a man's half night not slept tired eyed worn out one-day bearded was in a pyjama but could not even get up myself to the restroom not to speak of the bathroom and feel so miserable like a forgotten goat"...

I think I will reread the report just for curiosity reasons for what will jump into my eyes after all these months - an AR which was labeled a Coroner's Report only anyway so I doubt it ever would come close to any official AR. I have read an AR from our docs and that reads A LOT different.
I think I will cry tears of laughter again about LaToya's male companion witnessing in a lobby how somebody pulled some hairs out - wasn't it 3 persons present as witnesses and a yellow and blue box? I don't want to sound too disrespectful, but that last page said it all for me.
And wasn't it Craig Harvey, the chief assistant spokesperson of who was it ??? who tweeted about "three persons can keep a secret when two are dead"?
So far I only saw two Michaels - but ok, maybe we should consider even three...  ;)
I think the report was a masterpiece of ideas put into words.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Create your day. Create the most astounding year of your life. Be the change you want to see in the world! L.O.V.E.
***********************************************************************************************
"I am tired, I am really tired of manipulation." Michael Jackson, Harlem, New York, NY, July 6, 2002
***********************************************************************************************
******* Let's tear the walls in the brains of this world down.*******

Time to BE.

*

Suzy7

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
November 06, 2011, 04:50:12 AM
This thread is full of contradictions and is confusing.

Just to elaborate, the autopsy report does not indicate within what hour(s) he had died. As the OP stated, this would completely change the charges placed upon Murray and all of the speculation wouldn't exist. Finding the time of death is a coroners job and it wasn't done, if it was, his charges could be first degree murder with a valid unquestionable timeline. The OP does make some valid points.
 
  Im not sure where someone got that Michaels lupus was is remission? I've never heard Dr. Klein state that, perhaps I've missed something. He did have an auto-immune disorder, period, whether it was in remission or not.
The autopsy photo clearly shows contradicting "findings" here. The coloring of the body and the wig (or weave) still attatched with no signs of baldness. Also, the positioning of the body; the coroners report says he was in a position that would have his head facing straight up(to the ceiling), in the photo it was up and to the right. His lips were red which contradicted the previous gurney photo in which they had flesh tone appearance. Oh, and the blue feet and hands happens because that is where the body loses circulation faster as they are farther away from the heart.

Last Edit: November 30, 2011, 01:43:58 AM by Suzy7
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
November 14, 2011, 01:11:07 PM
<img src="You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login">


I couldnt find anywhere if this was discussed....


On the top of the report, notice it says "ACCIDENT/NATURAL???"

Then we learn later it was ruled HOMICIDE?


So how can a report conclude accidental/natural then change to homicide?
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
<img src="You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login">

Re: Debunking the Autopsy Report
February 09, 2013, 07:45:21 PM
I have to say something. I read this autopsy report and there is no mention of Michael Joe Jackson's lupus. It says vitiligo but anyone could have vitiligo. Michael Jackson had lupus and vitiligo. Also, there is no mention of Michael Jackson's skin grafting he had done on his scalp after the Pepsi burns. It just says tattoos. This is what makes me think that the autopsy report belongs to someone else and not Michael Jackson. By the way, the X-rays that were taken during the autopsies include dental x-rays. This is great because the attorney's representing Katherine Jackson were granted a court order to obtain from the coroner copies of of what is supposed to be Michael Jackson's slides and x-rays. These dental x-rays are important because a forensic dentist could use those to compare to Michael Jackson's dental x-rays from before June 25, 2009. If there is not a match, it could be proof that the autopsied body was not Michael Jackson at all and that Michael Jackson is alive.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal