Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators

Latest News => Michael Jackson News => Topic started by: Venus7 on March 03, 2010, 12:27:27 PM

Title: Is that true?
Post by: Venus7 on March 03, 2010, 12:27:27 PM
I read somewhere that Debbie Rowe and Randy(or  Jackson's security) prepared some kind of plot so Debbie could take her kids from Jackson family. To my understanding, Debbie was waiting for something big to come out for some big reason to notify children's protective service.
If that's the case, I would be happy to see MJ's kids living with Debbie and not with their grandmother, just because Katherine is way too nice and supporting so many MJ's brothers and their kids with MJ's money.
Debbie Rowe was and is a trully friend of MJ. She cared about him a lot, and the fact that she got money from MJ after divorce that was  just MJ's desition to show her gratitude for making him a father.IMO
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: Homba on March 03, 2010, 12:47:41 PM
Nice find, but do you remember where you read it from? =)
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: deepu priyanka on March 03, 2010, 12:55:51 PM
IF MJ IS REALLY DEAD THERE R CHANCES FOR DEBBIE TO TAKE AWAY THE KIDS BUT AT THE SAME TIME IF HE IS ALIVE ,HE  WOULD NEVER GIVE THE CHILDREN TO DEBBIE... CAUSE HE ALWAYS WANTED  THE KIDS WIT HIM....... MAY BE THIS COULD BE SOME TABLOID STUFF.................
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: the_gloved_one on March 03, 2010, 12:59:51 PM
i thought Debbie gave up her parental rights. Didn't this issue get resolved in court?
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: word on March 03, 2010, 03:22:21 PM
Debbie Rowe gave up her rights to children and wanted nothing to do with them,they are better off with family they and love,although now I have to wonder regarding the "taser gun incident".
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: kelly wright on March 03, 2010, 03:29:57 PM
Are yall forgetting that Diana Ross was the other person on the will ? And why would it be a bad thing for Debbie to have the kids .I am sure she didn't anticipate when she signed them away that Mj was going to die so young .She lives on a horse ranch ,kids love horses ! They may want to be with their mother at some point ,most people do .
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: XspeechlessX on March 03, 2010, 03:36:57 PM
Haa yeah... gun incident - kids get handed over to Diana who fyi.. just HAPPENS to be with Michael.  ;)
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: VeryLittleSusie on March 03, 2010, 05:51:11 PM
Diana was on the will - but was this will legit? I thought we have already discussed it was fake...  :?
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: simplyme on March 03, 2010, 06:28:17 PM
Quote from: "the_gloved_one"
i thought Debbie gave up her parental rights. Didn't this issue get resolved in court?

Debbie decided to have her rights restored after the trial and she did.  She has rights.
Debbie wouldn't be involved in some stupid underhanded plot to get the children from Katherine.  Debbie wants the best for the children and isn't a drama queen.
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: letstalkagain on March 03, 2010, 08:05:18 PM
Bottomline Debbie does not want kids and probably is not mother material.
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: hope on March 03, 2010, 08:34:45 PM
And where would this leave Blanket? He isnt Debbies and she has no rights to him. I dont think Paris and Prince would ever want to leave him. Im not saying she shouldnt have visitation, but I dont think it would be a good idea to seperate them from Blanket ( and Im sure Ms. Katherine would not give up rights to him, which I would agree with her). If the will is legit (which Im not sure it is), Michaels wishes for his children should be respected. Michael would have known his mother would help the rest of the family. Poor Michael supported most of them anyway. All I care about is making sure his children inherit all their daddy worked for all his life, and it worries me what will happen when Ms. Katherine is gone (IF and thats a big IF Michael is gone).
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: andreita2994 on March 03, 2010, 10:02:03 PM
i don't think debbie can have the kids. becuase she gave up her rights as a mother. and remember don't believe all the media says. how do we know what really happen with stun gun? we don't know therefore i don't believe it was such big deal  maybe it  made it up we know what media does for rating
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: all4loveandbelieve on March 03, 2010, 10:12:50 PM
Quote from: word
Debbie Rowe gave up her rights to children and wanted nothing to do with them,they are better off with family they and love,although now I have to wonder regarding the "taser gun incident".[/quote


I agree with you.. How can a mother give up her children for money.. I am a mother and I will never give up my children for millions in thIS world. My children are God' blessing.. In a way she sold her children to Michael.. SHE IS UNFIT TO BE A MOTHER SORRY. THIS IS HOW A FEEL, AND I AM SPEAKING BECAUSE I AM A MOTHER ... The children should stay with Katherine, don't forget she is also 75 yrs old.. she loves those children, and why should she play favoritism.. She has other grand kids, and it is ok for them to interact with all cousins. That is a family..
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: DancingTheDream on March 03, 2010, 10:26:43 PM
Well..  read my post about Karen viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638)

Karen came on facebook and basically insinuated that Grace was the one to call social services.

karen and Randy Jackson are close friends with each other.. and Randy was the one who gave the tip off to TMZ about the childrens workers going there in the first place....

So this may have a ring of truth in it...  there are certainly people out there plotting and scheming.
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: darkchild on March 03, 2010, 10:35:08 PM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Well..  read my post about Karen viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638)

Karen came on facebook and basically insinuated that Grace was the one to call social services.

karen and Randy Jackson are close friends with each other.. and Randy was the one who gave the tip off to TMZ about the childrens workers going there in the first place....

So this may have a ring of truth in it...  there are certainly people out there plotting and scheming.

Wow, that is very heavy! I am gobsmacked that KF and RJ are very close friends! :shock:  I am so worried and sick about MJ's children.  I am just heartbroken! :(  God bless you, DancingtheDream, for the info.
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: all4loveandbelieve on March 03, 2010, 10:46:29 PM
Quote from: "DancingTheDream"
Well..  read my post about Karen viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638 (http://michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=6638)

Karen came on facebook and basically insinuated that Grace was the one to call social services.

karen and Randy Jackson are close friends with each other.. and Randy was the one who gave the tip off to TMZ about the childrens workers going there in the first place....

So this may have a ring of truth in it...  there are certainly people out there plotting and scheming.

Why would Randy tell TMZ, isn't he the uncle of Prince, Paris, and Blanket?? Does he hate these children or what? As an uncle he should protect them not give them away. This hoax is more of a nightmare than anything else. I sincerely hope MJ comes out of his hiding and be with his children, before it is too late.
Title: Re: Is that true?
Post by: CrazyBanana on March 04, 2010, 01:44:34 AM
where would that leave Blanket? the kids should not be seperated...im pretty sure being together is more important than money :roll:
and Katherine gets money too, she can spend it however she pleases..if she chooses to spend it on her grand kinds so be it
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal