Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators

Hoax Investigation => The Conrad Murray Investigation & Court Case => After June 25, 2009 => Conrad Murray's Child Support Case => Topic started by: Yas on November 25, 2009, 04:25:16 PM

Title: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Yas on November 25, 2009, 04:25:16 PM
As xirisjex suggested maybe this really deserves it's own thread, so... here it is:

Quote from: "Kirsche"
Quote from: "Yas"
I'm not sure if this was posted already... Sorry if it was...

*Michael...L.O.V.E.*            November 25th, 2009 2:56 am ET

@everyone

People wake up! The judge who supposedly appeared and heard the Conrad Murray child support Las Vegas hearing last week actually retired back in July 2008.

Judge Gerald Hardcastle retired July 1, 2008!


WTF??


That's true!

Saturday, April 19, 2008
JUDGE GERALD HARDCASTLE RETIRES
KLAS has reported that Family Court Judge Gerald Hardcastle is retiring. Judge Hardcastle, who is one of the original Family Court Judges, will leave the bench on July 1st, 2008. The Nevada Supreme Court is currently accepting applications for the appointment of a replacement to serve out Judge Hardcastle's term.


But that doesn't proof, that he's michael but it Proof's that this Murray Child Support thing was a fake
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Nathalia on November 25, 2009, 04:38:20 PM
Oh my!
I hadn't seen this, thanks for making a new thread.
That "court hearing" seemed fake to me from day one.
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: SPAKKLE29FUL on November 25, 2009, 04:46:07 PM
it could be part of the film,you know when mj returns and has to explain all this cos everything seems to be filmed regarding all this hope i havent confused ,because i think i have just confused myself
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: MJJ1982 on November 25, 2009, 05:05:42 PM
Hm... Offtopic: Just like that TII Human Nature jacket... He was wearing it years ago, so that makes you think that TII was recorded earlier then they let us believe....
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: MJJ1982 on November 25, 2009, 05:07:08 PM
Child support hearing was fake, that's why they showed the garbage can. It's garbage!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Nathalia on November 25, 2009, 05:11:00 PM
@MJJ1982-
do you know what year he wore the jacket?
just curious :geek:
lol.
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: ForstAMoon on November 25, 2009, 05:23:47 PM
if child support hearing is fake (and i believe it is), then all of the "child support case" might be fake as the rest of it, "the audience" has to be kept busy with Dr.Murray case, so they have to come up with all of these stories around him: no job, no money, baby mama, child support, missed mortgage payments... i am sure more interesting stuff is yet to come for Dr.Murray
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Yas on November 25, 2009, 05:29:42 PM
@Nathalia you're welcome. it was in *Michael...Love* thread  :)

I really wonder why media doesn't notice things like this.
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Miss.Peppers on November 25, 2009, 05:33:55 PM
Wow.. that is interesting.  This gets wierder and wierder    :ugeek:
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: karen-ishealive on November 25, 2009, 05:38:50 PM
Why haven't any doctors, nurses, lawyers, judges etc etc.. come forward and said this case isn't right. If this judge is infact retired then why has no judge come forward and said hang on a minute this man is no longer a judge or why hasn't this judge come forward himself and said this is BS??
Are all the authorities involved!!!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: MJJ1982 on November 25, 2009, 05:44:13 PM
Quote from: "Nathalia"
@MJJ1982-
do you know what year he wore the jacket?
just curious :geek:
lol.

Forgive me, I'm tired and I don't know what year it is... Anyone who knows it?
You can see it at 1.10 and further.
[youtube:16l7mlyc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWeg8P3Cygg&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:16l7mlyc]
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: MJJ1982 on November 25, 2009, 05:45:15 PM
Quote from: "MJJ1982"
Quote from: "Nathalia"
@MJJ1982-
do you know what year he wore the jacket?
just curious :geek:
lol.

Forgive me, I'm tired and I don't know what year it is... Anyone who knows it?
You can see it at 1.10 and further. And sorry again, I can't find the 'original' video right now...
[youtube:3t7howyd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWeg8P3Cygg&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:3t7howyd]
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: ForstAMoon on November 25, 2009, 05:49:53 PM
i would guess that people just do not pay attention to details on this case like all of us do here. for the media and the vast majority of the world he is gone (sorry for saying this). you really need to be engaged to spot inconsistencies, it is I guess easier for us as we are just looking for them and even more are actually focusing on finding them. The rest is just taking whatever is given/published. I would ask the following question: if you hear some news about a subject that is not in your interest, how many times do you immediately jump to internet/library/ect to check the news by yourself - to tell the truth about myself I can say - "zero"times
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Miss.Peppers on November 25, 2009, 06:07:34 PM
That video made me cry
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: DooDoo on November 27, 2009, 04:52:57 PM
Watching this video has made ME sad and angry  :cry:  I'd have stood up for him like a tiger for her cubs , I'd have killed for him for God's sake!!!!
ehm..sorry about that  :oops:
anyway, the jacket is the same we saw in TII ..I wonder what year it was , it should be quite recent I suppose
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: MJFOREVER on November 27, 2009, 05:05:56 PM
What does it mean chuders & ladders or candyland? something bad i gues :?:
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: lunation777 on November 27, 2009, 05:53:15 PM
I think that the footage we've seen of the court hearing is real but maybe from a past hearing??.... Dr Murray had 2 child support cases, in 2002 & 2008...

Instrument: 20020220-02578 Book/Instr: 20020220 / 2578  
Document Type: Lien  Recorded: 02/20/2002 17:00:00  
ReRecorded: N Remarks:  
Requestor: FAMILY SUPPORT DIVISION  

1st Party:   MURRAY, CONRAD R
AVILES, ANN MARIE - AGT
2nd Party:   MALIBIRAN, NENITA C
 
Legal Description:  Parcel Number: 16411512017 Property Lien

 
Instrument: 20080129-04011 Book/Instr:    
Document Type: Judgment  Recorded: 01/29/2008 14:15:43  
ReRecorded: N Remarks:  
Requestor: NEVADA TITLE COMPANY

1st Party:   MURRAY, CONRAD R
2nd Party:   MALIBIRAN, NENITA C
CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES DEPT
COUNTY SANTA CLARA



I found this information here, scroll down to just passed the middle of the page, there's information about Conrad Murray
 http://webofdeception.com/ (http://webofdeception.com/)
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: alexa7 on November 27, 2009, 08:01:37 PM
http://www.clarkcountycourts.us/ejdc/co ... udges.html (http://www.clarkcountycourts.us/ejdc/courts-and-judges/judges.html)

OMG no Judge Hardcastle!!! I can't take any more I don't understand.... :cry:  :cry:  :cry:
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Wizard of Oz on November 27, 2009, 08:43:03 PM
http://mjfd.webs.com/apps/blog/entries/ ... rad-murray (http://mjfd.webs.com/apps/blog/entries/show/2184287-the-staged-child-support-case-feat-the-retired-judge-dr-conrad-murray)
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: steffmaster1 on November 28, 2009, 07:37:33 AM
so fake but why feel the need to put murray in spotlight again surely it would make people more suspicious bout child support hearing but no murder hearing?!!!! look how he was acting as if he had no clue he was told to stand up etc and fake money fake judge i just dont get why!!!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Yas on November 28, 2009, 07:53:27 AM
Ok, I had some more time to do the research on this and here is what I found. (Sorry for long post  :) )

With Murray in court, his lawyer Christopher Aaron paid $700 cash and promised to pay another $303 as part of the deal approved by Clark County District Court Judge Gerald Hardcastle.
Hardcastle took over the case after Family Court Judge Robert Teuton was forced to vacate his position earlier this month due to a gap in state election laws.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/nov/16/michael-jackson-doctor-conrad-murray-avoids-jail-c/


Then I was trying to find something about Judge Robert Teuton:

For Immediate Release: August 22, 2008
(Carson City, NV) – Governor Jim Gibbons today announced the appointment of
Robert Teuton to fill an open seat in Clark County’s family court.
Teuton will fill the remainder of the term of retired Judge Gerald Hardcastle, which runs through the end of 2010.
http://gov.state.nv.us/pressreleases/2008/pdf/pr-2008-08-22-teutonappointment.pdf

Nov. 12, 2009
CARSON CITY — Because of a gap in state election laws, the Nevada Supreme Court today ordered Family Court Judge Robert Teuton to immediately vacate his position.
The high court, in a decision written by Justice Michael Cherry, said Teuton had to give up the Clark County seat because his appointment ran out Jan. 5. He was appointed by Gov. Jim Gibbons to fill a vacancy on Aug. 22, 2008.
http://www.lvrj.com/news/breaking_news/Justices-order-Family-Court-Judge-Teuton-to-step-down-69890312.html


Then I was wondering if it's possible that retired judge takes over the case and I found this:

Senior status is a form of semi-retirement for United States federal judges. After federal judges have reached a certain combination of age and years of service on the federal courts, they are allowed to assume senior status.
In essence, under normal conditions, the chief judge or judicial council of a circuit may assign a senior judge belonging to that circuit to perform any duty within the circuit that the judge is willing and able to perform.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior_status


Then I was wondering if Judge Gerald Hardcastle has senior status and I found this :

Gerald Hardcastle’s Experience
* Senior Family Court Judge
  Eighth Judicial District Court

  (Judiciary industry)
  January 1993 — Present (16 years 11 months)

*Judge
 Eighth Judicial District Court - Family Division
 (Judiciary industry)
 January 1993 — July 2008 (15 years 7 months)
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/gerald-hardcastle/15/a12/326


So, Hardcastle took over the case after Family Court Judge Robert Teuton was forced to vacate his position. He could take over the case if he had senior status. Then I found that he has senior status. I guess that if I put together all of this means that maybe child support hearing wasn't fake.
Please keep in mind that I'm not from the US and I don't know nothing about US law except what I found on Internet. Also I don't know much about sources that I used. Well, except wikipedia. :)

I would also like to say that even if Judge Gerald Hardcastle could take over the case doesn't mean that Michael isn't alive. Keep the faith!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Wizard of Oz on November 28, 2009, 08:40:26 AM
thanks for your research but the information is comming from linkedin and he is inactive on linked in for more then a year he only have 2 connections en never check new ones because mine 5 are still pending and yes i used diffrend accounts laywer,judge, everything never get  a reply back....
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Yas on November 28, 2009, 09:07:49 AM
Quote from: "Wizard of Oz"
thanks for your research but the information is comming from linkedin and he is inactive on linked in for more then a year he only have 2 connections en never check new ones because mine 5 are still pending and yes i used diffrend accounts laywer,judge, everything never get  a reply back....

Oh, sorry, I didn't see your previous post. Yes, I used http://www.linkedin.com (http://www.linkedin.com), I forgot to add last link. Well like I said, I don't know what kind of websites are these, I have never used them before, except wikipedia.
But, it says that the linkedin page that I used was last modified September 9th, 2009. Maybe this is stupid question, but how do you know that he is inactive for more than a year? And what is it that site about anyway? I'm lost now.  :oops:
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: badloving on November 28, 2009, 09:13:23 AM
that video is sad...made me :cry:  :x ....i wish he had more love...
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: francisca81 on November 28, 2009, 11:18:23 AM
Quote from: "MJJ1982"
Child support hearing was fake, that's why they showed the garbage can. It's garbage!

i also really believe that this is the meaning of the garbage cans ;)  
why zoom in on it?? because it's garbage...
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: angelshadow on November 28, 2009, 12:23:27 PM
[quote = "francisca81"] [quote = "MJJ1982"] Child Support Anhörung war gefälscht, deshalb zeigten sie den Abfalleimer. Es ist Müll! [/ Quote]

[color = # 8000FF] i auch wirklich glauben, dass dies die Bedeutung der Mülltonnen ist;)
Zoom auf, warum es? weil es Müll ...[/ color] [/ quote]

Exactly I also think that this the meaning could be for the rubbish.
That is stressed the rubbish at sovielen places, is this all one garbage. ;)
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: TheKingWillReturn on December 19, 2009, 08:12:04 PM
Conrad Murray is due to go back to "Court" on 18th of Jan, Isn't he or am i mistaken, Well i noticed the date Michael divorced Lisa Marie... 18th of Jan... A lot of dates are being repeated in this hoax.
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: lookingforthetroot on January 03, 2010, 12:38:40 AM
Ok I came across another hoax video showing that Dr Murrays girlfriend's lawyer was also at
Micheal funeral.. Hmmmmmm

sorry I still dont know how to post a Ytube video it still doesnt work for me

ThePatie7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12DQ-ojrVlQ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12DQ-ojrVlQ)

Trial is a hoax and lawyer is strange video
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: susie_23 on January 04, 2010, 12:03:50 PM
Still nothing regarding the court hearing that was scheduled for today. Nothing on CNN, TMZ, PITNB or Perez Hilton.
Hmm.
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: SeeingClues on January 04, 2010, 12:13:04 PM
at the end of the last hearing the judge ordered Murray back on court on 1/4 and Murray's lawyer said, "He'll be here"...

perhaps a question for TMZ live..

unless the child's mother is forgiving all future payments and Murray is off the hook...she already forgave $13,000 in child support.  

Oh, the oddities never cease!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Iused2dream on January 04, 2010, 12:49:18 PM
Does anyone recall the case # for this child support case?  I can't seem to find anything on Clark County court site regarding this case when searching Conrad Murray (only finding a lot of old creditors claims!!)
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: SeeingClues on January 04, 2010, 12:50:41 PM
I don't even think the hearing on 11/16 was listed in there... perhaps they only list real hearings? :D
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Iused2dream on January 04, 2010, 12:51:43 PM
Quote from: "SeeingClues"
I don't even think the hearing on 11/16 was listed in there... perhaps they only list real hearings? :D
I had a feeling you might reply to my comment  ;) ..my thoughts exactly but always researching, ya know!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: angelshadow on January 04, 2010, 01:16:57 PM
It was so played! Wen Interested to the delay in payment??
This is ridiculous ..... Murray would normally other charges :!:
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: sweet1 on January 06, 2010, 05:56:10 PM
Well! last night (Jan 5th) when I was watching CNN the updated ticker at the bottom of the screen said that Michael Jackson's doc evades prison because child support payments have been paid. Okay! I guess he finally got his fat check from his part in the HOAX. What a crock! This man will never go to prison for anything as far as I am concerned. Keep the Faith!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Em on January 23, 2010, 09:50:20 PM
Come on now, does someone just hand over $700 in cash in the courtroom like that? I liked how the camera zoomed into the money. That seemed strange. It was 7 hundred! There's that 7 again.
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: JACKSONGIRL on January 23, 2010, 09:52:03 PM
Quote from: "Yas"
As xirisjex suggested maybe this really deserves it's own thread, so... here it is:

Quote from: "Kirsche"
Quote from: "Yas"
I'm not sure if this was posted already... Sorry if it was...

*Michael...L.O.V.E.*            November 25th, 2009 2:56 am ET

@everyone

People wake up! The judge who supposedly appeared and heard the Conrad Murray child support Las Vegas hearing last week actually retired back in July 2008.

Judge Gerald Hardcastle retired July 1, 2008!


WTF??


That's true!

Saturday, April 19, 2008
JUDGE GERALD HARDCASTLE RETIRES
KLAS has reported that Family Court Judge Gerald Hardcastle is retiring. Judge Hardcastle, who is one of the original Family Court Judges, will leave the bench on July 1st, 2008. The Nevada Supreme Court is currently accepting applications for the appointment of a replacement to serve out Judge Hardcastle's term.


But that doesn't proof, that he's michael but it Proof's that this Murray Child Support thing was a fake
Obviously it was a fake conrad urray isn't even his real name lol how can you have a court hearing under a false name?
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: simplyme on January 31, 2010, 11:09:14 PM
The judge filled in for the other judge and I don't really recall the circumstances.  there was something in the news about it but I've yet to find the link again.  It might have something to do with this which I found on Wikipedia.
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: Kirsche on February 01, 2010, 01:25:19 PM
And the other thing that convinced me, that this hearing is fake was the money!

Is it usual to pay the money right there in court?

But another thing!
 The face on the money is GILDA! ( the woman of the Smooth Criminal short film)!

It totally looks like her.

There's video out there...but I can't find it anymore it proves that the money there is fake!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: i_need YoU on February 01, 2010, 01:40:50 PM
the reason why the media or no judges or anyone steps forward and says wait a minute! is because everything the media says people assume it must be true...they probably were like saying "i thought he was retired" but when the news media announces there was a child support case they change their mind and say " oh i guess i was mistaken" THE MEDIA IS TAKING AWAY OUR VOICE AND OUR OPINIONS THEY HAVE TOO MUCH POWER AND THIS MUST CHANGE!
Title: Re: Child support hearing - fake?
Post by: starlight30 on February 05, 2010, 01:10:05 PM
Yesterday on Fox News they were talking about Murray and replayed the the child support hearing tape. Are those cases usually taped anyway? I don't see why they would be. They showed Murray's watch which is an interesting detail.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal