Michael Jackson Death Hoax Investigators
Hoax Investigation => The Conrad Murray Investigation & Court Case => After June 25, 2009 => Court Case & Hearings; Discussion and Articles => Topic started by: JesusLover05 on May 25, 2012, 05:54:31 PM
-
Conrad Murray should have done a DNA test on the supposed dead body of Michael Jackson and compared that to DNA of Michael Jackson when he was alive for proper identification purposes. The only way Conrad Murray' appeal would work is if he does DNA testing to make sure that he killed someone else and not Michael Jackson. What do you think? Should Conrad Murray do DNA testing? DNA tests should have been done just to make sure that was Michael Jackson that died and not someone else. I just have a feeling that someone else died June 25, 2009 and not Michael Jackson.
-
That, or dig up the corpse, or ANYTHING that might finally make people go hmmmm.
Does anyone know a date for Murray's appeal?
-
The only way Conrad Murray' appeal would work is if he does DNA testing to make sure that he killed someone else and not Michael Jackson.
No reason to dig up a dead body when there is no (claimed) evidence of foul play.
No matter who died - if somebody died - the "missing-evidence-cause-consequence" logic of the jury about CM's neglect and inappropriate behavior will remain the same and - in this combination of past, present and future remarkable - incontestably wrong.
DNA testing will not help change the sentence.
Case closed and in no way it could be re-opened again - except on the originator's command.
DNA testing would help, however, if a person purchasing those 3 hairs would ask for official expertise that the hairs are Michael's indeed.
In doing so, the unbalanced mind of today's society is put on the cross ("it is out there, for everybody to see").
Truth does not matter when people are dying but it does matter when you put $$$ on the table ? :suspect:
We will all get nailed. Everybody will receive his/her mirror without any exception.
-
The only way Conrad Murray' appeal would work is if he does DNA testing to make sure that he killed someone else and not Michael Jackson.
No reason to dig up a dead body when there is no (claimed) evidence of foul play.
No matter who died - if somebody died - the "missing-evidence-cause-consequence" logic of the jury about CM's neglect and inappropriate behavior will remain the same and - in this combination of past, present and future remarkable - incontestably wrong.
DNA testing will not help change the sentence.
Case closed and in no way it could be re-opened again - except on the originator's command.
DNA testing would help, however, if a person purchasing those 3 hairs would ask for official expertise that the hairs are Michael's indeed.
In doing so, the unbalanced mind of today's society is put on the cross ("it is out there, for everybody to see").
Truth does not matter when people are dying but it does matter when you put $$$ on the table ? :suspect:
We will all get nailed. Everybody will receive his/her mirror without any exception.
I really believe that DNA testing will be involved in the course of future events leading to... well you know what :icon_e_wink:
But not with the Conrad Murray case though.
As I said before: this would be ingenious and sophisticated...on so many levels.
Not only killing two birds with one stone...but many many more :icon_mrgreen:
Mirror mirror on the wall......