0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

*

Tarja

For the sake of reality and for the sake of keeping this into reality: Barry Shaw does not exist. Sad that some still think he does and also eat his shit. Barry Shaw is a name, a character, an invented "person". This guy does not exist and either has been seen. The fact that he showed a bunch of photos of MICHAEL claiming it was him in the photos (by the way he also showed some photos from the court in 2005 claiming it was him in the photos and not Michael, so he fooled also the judges! What a smartass, don't you think?) doesn't make it TRUE. And the fact that you hear a computerized voice doesn't mean that voice exists- it can be easily made on the computer with today's technology.  
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
[size=150]I won\'t be using this account/ID name anymore. My name is Yulia, for who wants to know. Souza, you can delete this account if you want to.I\'m not using it anymore.[/size]

Quote from: "Tarja"
For the sake of reality and for the sake of keeping this into reality: Barry Shaw does not exist. Sad that some still think he does and also eat his shit. Barry Shaw is a name, a character, an invented "person". This guy does not exist and either has been seen. The fact that he showed a bunch of photos of MICHAEL claiming it was him in the photos (by the way he also showed some photos from the court in 2005 claiming it was him in the photos and not Michael, so he fooled also the judges! What a smartass, don't you think?) doesn't make it TRUE. And the fact that you hear a computerized voice doesn't mean that voice exists- it can be easily made on the computer with today's technology.  


100% agree with you
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Uploaded with You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

*

mjjamm

[youtube:1p3engoh]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyg22JAuSAA&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:1p3engoh]
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

MissG

Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

*

MissG

Quote from: "mjjamm"
[youtube:30p33udj]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lyg22JAuSAA&feature=player_embedded[/youtube:30p33udj]
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
("Minkin güerveeeee")
Michael pls come back


"Why a four-year-old child could understand this hoax. Run out and find me a four-year-old child. I can't make head nor tail out of it"

LOL you make me laugh with your smile face!

Quote from: "Gema"
Imagine if he starts now posting in the forums  :lol:

We will look like this
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login,You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

*

everlastinglove_MJ

The Barry Shaw I'm thinking of, is a filmmaker who owns Barry shaw Productions. He and Dana Gedrick made a documentary Witnessing Headlines (2008) about the trial in 2005. Their focus was on the media's influence, instead of covering the trial, the fans, being part of the media hype and the media ratings. I haven't seen this documentary yet, but that's gonna change. I hope the documentary is still availabe. I think it's very interesting.

About the Documentary
Try to imagine two filmmakers taking their video cameras in hand to film the hoopla around a celebrity trial... the trial of none other than legendary pop star Michael Jackson. Even though Barry Shaw and Dana Gedrick knew this was no oridnary celebrity trial, it would prove to be far from anything the pair of them had expected to encounter.

For starters, they had not anticipated the fierce extent to which the fans' compassion would influence journalists and media covering the trial, nor had they forseen the extent to which the media's personal feelings and biases would enter into what would be presented to the public. The result was for Barry and Dana to realize that such strong personal feelings on the part of the media all but precluded the hope of presuming innocence.

Try to imagine, as well, that you are a staunch and devoted fan of a man despised by much of the world. Imagine that you are only a few against so many who've already condemned the defendant in their hearts. Your view may appear extreme to many, though to you, the fan, it is precisely the opposite; it is the others' views that are extreme.

It is true that opinions can obscure facts, but in this case, it is almost a given that media coverage would play a part in distorting facts to the point where a fair trial becomse almost impossible... especially when the accused has already been deemed guilty by a majority of the population. In Barry Shaw's opinion, there was something inherently wrong with using a high publicized child molestation trial to increase media ratiings. For Dana Gedrick, mother of three sons, it was more about keeping her personal feelings out of her work.

Together, the two filmmakers came up with the idea of turning the cameras around on the media.

While we all know that it is impossible to remain uninfluenced by what goes on around us, media coverage and personal opinions have the potential to shroud facts, and in the minds of some individuals, totally obliterate them. It was for these reasons that Barry and Dana decided to focus on the media's influence in the trial of Michael Jackson and allow their film to demonstrate just how impossible it is to remain untouched by that which we witness or become a part of.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Barry Shaw Productions and MJ working together in making a film/documentary about the hoax, the Murray trial isn't unthinkable 8-)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
It's all for L.O.V.E.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal