0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
your reasons for co-operating are stated as:QuoteWe decided to cooperate because:The Sun is read by a huge audience, and has a daily circulation of 3.5 million newspapers, so the hoax would get world wide attention.In case The Sun would screw up and Jenna Sloan would not live up to her promises, we could prove The Sun is indeed Tabloid Trash.Nothing mentioned about michael jackson - that you regarded it in his interest or that of ddNothing mentioned that you had weighed the consequences and the likely damage if it went pear shapedNothing mentioned about the fact the mike hated the tabloids and The Sun newspaper in particularNothing mentioned that you weighed fans reaction to you co-operating with a tabloid and especially this tabloidWhy would you need to prove that The Sun is Tabloid newspaper - everyone knows that already - you knew that before you courted this animal surely?you said on another thread that we have freedom of expression on the existing threads about The Sun i hope that you allow me this freedom. Please view my comments in a constuctive way. thank you.i have read the emails sent and i note that you hoped for more - and were disappointed by the outcome - i give you that. but in future i think the content of a press release would need to be worked on, you may need a copywriter in the future, and think about the main points, it was a bit weak. i only say this as i have had to write copy for my website, or adverts and press releases. there are some great books on the web. constructive comment
We decided to cooperate because:The Sun is read by a huge audience, and has a daily circulation of 3.5 million newspapers, so the hoax would get world wide attention.In case The Sun would screw up and Jenna Sloan would not live up to her promises, we could prove The Sun is indeed Tabloid Trash.
well thank you puff for being politei have put my view forward - but i dont think i have got a response really. i suppose what i really want to know do they have any regrets for mike and ddi think that is my real question in all of this and one i dont think i have voiced before.it would go along way - if they had an ounce of regret for any damage done and acknowledged that and apologised.this matters alot to me.
you are answering a question with a quesionand i said "any damage" i did not mean image i meant "any damage"
sorry puff i know your trying to be polite to me but you are answering me again with another question.is it so hard to apologise
okay - i have your answer thank you for your response
i do have a grip on reality :lol:
Quote from: "the arabian nights"i do have a grip on reality :lol:the arabian nights, you are really, and I mean really kind of pissing me off now. You have stated your opinion a hundred times now, it's DONE. If you keep repeating yourself, I am going to de-activate your account so you can cool down for a few days.Try to see it from the other side: We think it was the right thing to do, you think it was not. That's fine by me, everyone can have their opinion and you made yours quite clear. Yet we are not bashing the people that say it was a bad decision, we only explain why we think i was a good one. You on the other hand think it's necessary to keep provoking, bashing and petronising us, while in fact we BOTH don't know if this will turn out for the good or the bad.Your argument is that Mike hated the Sun and the tabloids, but you don't have to tell me that because I already knew that.My argument is that this is a hoax and things are happening on purpose. Mike himself is using TMZ (a tabloid!!! ) for 11 months already, who called him Jacko as well, so are you going to bash him as well because he is working with something he disgusts? If we would have done anything in danger to Mike or Dave, I am sure we would have heard SOMETHING from SOMEONE after 3 days, yet everyone is silent.So we both have good arguments and we are not going to agree on this one. Half of the board thinks it's a good thing, the other half thinks it's a bad thing. I am very sorry, but I can't please you all.So stop the sarcasm and the provoking now and continue investigating the hoax. Thank you very much.
you are answering a question with a quesionand i said "any damage" i did not mean image i meant "any damage"is there no regret at all?this is a constructive question - am not bashing or anything at alli think it would mean a lot to me and to other members if the question was considered and responded to.considering mj and dd