Credit goes to MJOne at .net for this find!!! WOWWERS!!!
Here is the link to the thread on .net
http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxdeath.net/ ... =64&t=7492
MJOne: I mentioned a while ago that I'd seen some strange posts on http://www.michaeljackson.com during the early months of last year, before June 25th.
I went searching for it in March this year. I haven't posted them here yet, but I will now.
One was asking what would we do if Michael died and another was this.. posted on March 17 2009.
'limits if exploitation happens to an artist you are fan of?'
I think that we as fans of Michael feel there are limits to what we allow to happen to the artist we are fan of. When he get's wrongly accused we react. Like when the tabloids made wrong allegations about his skin, fans made youtube films to explain the thruth. When the allegations of child abuse came there were protest all around the world from those believing in his honesty.
But what if he would be to ill to perform while you have already payed. Let's say as a hypothetical situation a similar sort of thing would happen to Michael now as happened to Elvis years ago.
So let's say, we as fans witnessed a pressconference of Michael's bodyguards on television saying Michael is ill and that most of his money is gone. And because there are debts and contracts in which Michael has obligated himself to do a concerttour, Michael feels he has to appear on stage although that means he has to be filled with painkillers or other medicine. Although it is obvious to all people present in the concerthall that he should be in his bed, nobody of the management decides to cancel the show because of the financial consequenses. For those with no imagination to what it can look like, watch the last liveshows of Elvis.
Would you as a fan then feel obligated to do anything about it? I mean do you think going on stage filled with painkillers or other medicine is a price famous people have to pay? Or would you then be willing to let Michael have the ticketmoney to make sure that he could take a rest but then still could pay off the contractobligations?.
I for me think I would not have any problem with giving Michael my ticketmoney if a situation like that apeared. I would not like to go to any show where a performer had to ignore his health in such a matter he has to be filled up with painkillers or whatever pills because contracts say he should appear.
http://www.michaeljackson.com/fi/conten ... ou-are-fan
Before anyone says..I know the autopsy stated he was NOT full of painkillers, in fact there were lots from prescriptions that he hadn't touched. So, not counting that comment, but look at the rest of the post isn't it strange someone was saying something like this in March last year?
I'm not making any statement, I'm just saying, it freaks me out that something of this type was posted at all before 25th June.
