Blacked out photo

Started by Jacksonology, April 25, 2010, 11:59:43 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

JacksonologyTopic starter

April 25, 2010, 11:59:43 AM Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 12:01:42 PM by Jacksonology

In one of TMZ's ''Remember Michael'' Galleries they posted this photo: the one they posted was the one with just Michael. but they blacked out Ben Evenstad who happended to take the famous ''ambulance photo''.I suppose it would look funny to show MJ and that guy near a white van..hmm..where else have we seen a white van? and doesn't the background look like a Garage? where else have we seen a White Van and Garage...?


Datroot

April 25, 2010, 12:00:36 PM #1 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Why is MJ wearing his jim-jams?



I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

Steph16

April 25, 2010, 12:12:33 PM #2 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Datroot"

Why is MJ wearing his jim-jams?

he always did :L

loma

April 25, 2010, 12:13:23 PM #3 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Datroot"

Why is MJ wearing his jim-jams?

Because he's Michael F** Jackson.  :lol:
JK Because he was gonna need to take his top off anyways for the ambulance pic.  8-)
I seriously feel like the ambulance pic could have been taken that day.

Michael, we\'ll never stop loving you.
We\'re all wishing you well, and wishing you home.

Tina K.

April 25, 2010, 01:19:59 PM #4 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Jacksonology"

In one of TMZ's ''Remember Michael'' Galleries they posted this photo: the one they posted was the one with just Michael. but they blacked out Ben Evenstad who happended to take the famous ''ambulance photo''.I suppose it would look funny to show MJ and that guy near a white van..hmm..where else have we seen a white van? and doesn't the background look like a Garage? where else have we seen a White Van and Garage...?

yeah, the Jumping out of van video. Interesting.

Michael I love you allways.

londonluck

April 25, 2010, 03:23:18 PM #5 Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 03:32:13 PM by londonluck

The picture was taken around 2002. Michael was at his home early in the morning when paparazzi caught him. He had no make up on and his bandages and scar on the cheek could be seen. He begged the paparazzi not to take the picture, but it was taken and sold for 1.5 or 15 millions, I don't remember for sure. They talked about this picture and accident in 2003 documentary on Hollywood TV.


eviltwin

April 25, 2010, 03:29:25 PM #6 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Um, Mike has tons of makeup on in this shot, look at his brows, eyes and face. I thought the scar on his face was on the LEFT (a pox scar).


Tina K.

April 25, 2010, 03:31:48 PM #7 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "londonluck"

The picture was taken around 2002. Michael was at his home early in the morning when paparazzi caught him. He had no make up on and his bandages and scar on the cheek could be seen. He begged the paparazzi not to take the picture, but it was taken and sold for 1.5 or 15 millions, I don't remember for sure. They talked about this picture and accident in 2003 documentary on Hollywood TV.

I wonder what he was doing in a garage early in the morning, with no make up, does not sound like Michael. In the pic it does not seem like he was angry at the papz... If he diden't want the pic to be taken, then why is he posing like this ? anyway, it looks like he has make up on.

Michael I love you allways.

londonluck

April 25, 2010, 03:36:55 PM #8 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Tina K."

Quote from: "londonluck"

The picture was taken around 2002. Michael was at his home early in the morning when paparazzi caught him. He had no make up on and his bandages and scar on the cheek could be seen. He begged the paparazzi not to take the picture, but it was taken and sold for 1.5 or 15 millions, I don't remember for sure. They talked about this picture and accident in 2003 documentary on Hollywood TV.

I wonder what he was doing in a garage early in the morning, with no make up, does not sound like Michael. In the pic it does not seem like he was angry at the papz... If he diden't want the pic to be taken, then why is he posing like this ? anyway, it looks like he has make up on.

Anyway, this picture existed long before 2009.


ForstAMoon

April 25, 2010, 03:40:30 PM #9 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

According to http://www.bauergriffinonline.com this is the description of the picture:

"-a pajama-clad Michael, accompanied by Laperruque, after a doctro's visit in Beverly Hills.  Michael had picked up "Child" and "Parents" magazine at a nearby new"

there is actually one more photo taken at the same time

http://bauergriffinonline.com/2009/07/j ... bfm_page=2


somekindofsign

April 25, 2010, 03:41:50 PM #10 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Thank you for the date londonluck! that´s what I was asking to myself...


teine21

April 25, 2010, 04:03:08 PM #11 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

If you look at the way he looks, he looks similar to the ambulance pic  ;) I wonder if this could've been planned way back then & the ambulance picture was taken at this time...& maybe there was nobody in the ambulance or a dummy on June 25th  ;) Hmmm...


tabloidburn

April 25, 2010, 04:16:38 PM #12 Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 04:28:46 PM by tabloidburn

about the make up: mike had his eyebrows, eyeleine and lipline tattooed, so he would look like wearing makeup anyway. when you blow the photo up, you see that there is no make up on his face. he has stubbles and the skin is not 'one color smooth'.

ben has a small digicam in his hand there, i would figure  that he has a more professional one for his usual work. the timing would fit, since mike looked about 10 years younger in the ambulance pic. so maybe that was indeed the occasion when the shot later used for the ambulance pic was made. i'm thinking anyways that this whole thing was planned at least 10 years in advance.

interesting that there is an edited version with ben cut off... :mrgreen:

just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel - mj 2003

i have incredible disguises, i can fool my own mother - mj 1988

...details at eleven...

wear something green!

proud member of the army of l.o.v.e!

loma

April 25, 2010, 04:27:30 PM #13 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "teine21"

If you look at the way he looks, he looks similar to the ambulance pic  ;) I wonder if this could've been planned way back then & the ambulance picture was taken at this time...& maybe there was nobody in the ambulance or a dummy on June 25th  ;) Hmmm...

Yes! That's what I thought!
I think we may be onto something people!

Michael, we\'ll never stop loving you.
We\'re all wishing you well, and wishing you home.

JacksonologyTopic starter

April 25, 2010, 09:45:40 PM #14 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote

so maybe that was indeed the occasion when the shot later used for the ambulance pic was made

or maybe the coroner van video, something is up Michael has that devious look on his face


Similar topics (5)