0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rankings
April 24, 2010, 09:33:32 PM
I think some rankings on the forum would be nice. like on the other forum. like new memember, Silver memember, Gold memember, Diamond memember. like it goes by how many Post you have.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

somekindofsign

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 09:36:19 PM
What for?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 09:37:11 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
What for?
mmm idk it would be interesting......
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

somekindofsign

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 09:39:42 PM
I think it would be discriminating Jacksonology,
And kinda hierarchical.
We have more important things to do  ;)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 09:46:16 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
I think it would be discriminating Jacksonology,
And kinda hierarchical.
We have more important things to do  ;)
well somekindofsign it's just something i threw out there, and i don't think it will be that bad, might motivate the forum to keep posting!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

somekindofsign

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 09:50:19 PM
May also cause many other things.
I know you´re throwing out... that´s why I give you my opinion.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 09:53:26 PM
Quote from: "somekindofsign"
May also cause many other things.
I know you´re throwing out... that´s why I give you my opinion.
no offense taken!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

somekindofsign

  • Guest
Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 09:58:10 PM
I know... ;)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

loma

Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 11:34:40 PM
I think it'd be kinda nice.  :)
It would help me beat the shyness I have on posting on important treads.
 :P
I like it.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Michael, we\'ll never stop loving you.
We\'re all wishing you well, and wishing you home.

Re: Rankings
April 24, 2010, 11:46:47 PM
would that be a cause for  ppl to act "a prating fool?"  :lol:  :lol: (unnecessary comments?)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Sangre

Re: Rankings
August 12, 2010, 04:33:05 AM
Ranking systems are really fun on message boards, but I think this forum is far too serious to create members a reason to spam in order to boost themselves. It's not a popularity contest anyway....
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
"No one should judge what I\'ve done with my life. Not unless they\'ve been in my shoes every horrible day and every sleepless night." ~ Michael J. (1995)

*

MashMike

Re: Rankings
August 12, 2010, 04:40:34 AM
agree with Sangre
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
NO BROKEN BRIDGES CAN TURN US AROUND,CAUSE WHAT WE\'RE SEARCHING FOR, WILL SOON BE FOUND,CAUSE WE\'RE ALMOST THERE, JUST ONE MORE STEP,JUST ONE MORE STEP,DON\'T GIVE UP CAUSE WE\'RE ALMOST THERE

*

PJ4MJ

Re: Rankings
August 12, 2010, 08:02:37 AM
Agree with Sangre and MashMike.

I don't see the point in having a ranking system.  The only purpose is to build up someone in their own mind and in the eyes of others.  That's not what this site is about.

I could post 5,000 times and become a Gold member, but half of those posts could say just:
 ;)  :P  :roll:  :lol:

So Gold, Platinum, whatever = empty titles.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

~Souza~

Re: Rankings
August 12, 2010, 08:16:39 AM
That is not going to happen for the simple reason that people will post unimportant stuff just to post and get a new rank. It's not important how many posts you have. You can have 6000 posts and never really contributed something, all like 'OMG what a nice picture' and stuff like that, or you can have 20 very long investigated posts with very good information. To me that person with the 20 good posts deserves the status diamond member, not the one with the 6000 posts. It's not important how many posts you have, it's about the work you put into it and the info you provide.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal