0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

UTisNUM1

  • Guest
Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 11:51:15 AM
Okay so i've been coming here for a while and a lot of people do not necessarily agree with my thinking Michael has in fact, died. But for some reason people honestly think that just because something is filmed in HD, that it doesn't add up. Do people honestly believe that?

TV networks, Movies, News networks have all been using HD cameras to record their shows and programs. They have been since HD went mainstream 5 years ago. Not all of them started in HD when HD became available to the general public with HDTV's being sold but most, if not all networks use HD cameras to flim there material.

This is it - shot with RED Cameras which shoot video at a higher resolution than HD. The ones used to film This is it is the RED One which is the most used HD camera in Hollywood due to it's unsurpasses quality and it shoots videos at 4096 x 2304 as compared to "Full HD" at 1920 x 1080. Most networks use these cameras as well. Why was This is it filmed to begin with? Probably for the same reason there is footage of the Dangerous tour rehearsals and some History tour rehearsal footage - for Michael's personal library.

Everything pretty much is flimed in HD, it's the standard. So arguing that just because the Funeral, the Memorial, This is it and the This is it press conference were being filmed in HD is a moot point and doesn't hold any water at all when it comes to the "hoax".

TS was right, the website should make a "Coherent Theroy" section because when people who are just hearing about the possibility of a hoax come to this site and see arguments like "The funeral was filmed in HD, why would it be filmed in HD? That obviously means Michael is alive.", they turn away from believing since most the arguments are silly and are based on people's imagination and not fact.

That's my two cents, people can't argue the HD filming and they sure can't argue that HD isn't the standard but if it wasn't, things would still be getting shot in SD.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

bec

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 12:00:15 PM
K so why was the funeral filmed at all? Jackson family home movie collection?

Come on.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Are you entertained?

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 12:09:44 PM
Quote from: "UTisNUM1"
That's my two cents, people can't argue the HD filming and they sure can't argue that HD isn't the standard but if it wasn't, things would still be getting shot in SD.

i agree with that, but i think what hoax believers have done is they pointed out a lot of weirdness about the funeral, not just that it's filmed in HD. this point is placed in the context of a seemingly fake setting (i.e. possibly green screened, studio lights etc), people not appearing sad (e.g. Mac Culkin & gf who were smiling/laughing), the row of garbage cans again, the liberian girl photo, etc. all these point towards a hoax, though they may not 100% prove it.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 12:31:44 PM
i'm with jukebox here. there is no proof for a hoax, since none of us here knows that for a fact. we can only collect what we take as clues and make a connection somewhere pointing to a hoax. the thing is here: you can always find a connection somewhere, something relating to mike. hd-filming is not something that is exclusive to michael jackson, but other things are. so someone stating that hd-filming is a proof for this hoax would be wrong anyway. and who turns away on one statement is not really interested in finding out, i think. i read and researched over 6 months before i even joined this forum here, so it takes some preparatory work and using of common sense to become a believer in the first place.  

on the other hand, there is no legally valid proof yet that mike has actually died. so we're still 50/50 here, with more clues pointing to a hoax than to a death or cover up. there are too many litlle details in this that nobody but mike himself could have thought up, imo. and i repeat: as long as there is no ucla-medical official stating under oath that michael joe jackson has actually died under his watch on june 25, 2009 and produces legally valid docs to prove it, i will continue to believe in a hoax.  

 :mrgreen:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel - mj 2003

i have incredible disguises, i can fool my own mother - mj 1988

...details at eleven...

wear something green!

proud member of the army of l.o.v.e!

*

loyalfan

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 02:28:26 PM
hi there tabloidburn..........i agree with your post...and dont forget my "OFFICIAL QUESTIONS LIST" i started.....that alone begs the question HOW CAN THIS WHOLE THING HAVE SO MANY UNANSWERED QUESTIONS????? it just does not sit right.....love from diane xxx
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 02:34:53 PM
LAX was closed when MJ died? TMZ's weird way of words. Jermaine's airport slip up. Harvey's slip up? The family seems to know who killed him yet they're keeping their mouth shut?? the family can't keep their stories straight. Look at the official question list for more. Look I'm half half on this whole beLIEver thing. But there are many unanswered questions. I want answers that's why I'm here
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
[size=200]ii LOVE you Michael.!!! My life will nevaah be the same.! Cause boy you came and changed..the way I walk. The way ii talk<3[/color][/size]

yuu rockked maah world. yuu knoe yuu did. && everythin ii own I giive

I can\'t be still, yuu THRILL meeh. baybee be mine.!<3

*

Sarahli

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 03:44:29 PM
Tabloidburn answered pretty well. I'll add that sometimes or even often the truth is not obvious, the truth is always hidden and you have to work hard to find it.
In this particular and unique situation we have managed to collect a huge number of inconsistencies, clues, hints that lead a lot of people to believe that Michael is still alive and that this death is a hoax. You cannot sum it up to the HD filming only. This is the sum of all the evidences which give sense to all this and if someone really want to know the truth he/she will have to study what is available here or on other forums or even on youtube.

The unanswered question list is a good thing and it's obvious that patience and time are required. Also the forum is dispatched in different sections and someone who comes here for the first time can choose the subject that interest him/her.

Plus on the index of this site there is a good summary of the main inconsistencies and clues You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login it will be a good thing to start with for the newcomers.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
We are here for you Michael and will always love you whatever happens.
'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
"You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them."

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 04:11:45 PM
You all have interesting comments, but if the hoax theory is to gain any credibility you really have to go out there and back up your statements using professional opinions. For example, how do you prove that Jermaine making a statement about his brother's death renders the statement legally or medically invalid? Amir Dan Rubin introduced him. So Amir Dan Rubin - Chief Operating Officer - knowingly allowed Jermaine to make a false statement in his hospital about MJ's death and allowed Jermaine to lie about the treatment his medical staff had given MJ? Is it not possible that Jermaine wanted to do this statement himself? If you really wanted to find out if what Jermaine did made MJ's death invalid you really have to go and ask some questions first. Who says it makes the death invalid? A huge jump in conclusion.

Has anyone actually gone out and proved in a professional manner why all the medical reports are false? Or is that conjecture. You know that TMZ Harvey is a lawyer......he actually said on camera that a small abbreviation or alteration such as Joe/Joseph is of no consequence and does not make something legally invalid. So has anyone checked this out with a lawyer(s) who would know?

What would you class as legally valid proof that MJ died, that has not been released already? If these documents are all false, they have to proven false properly - with backed up evidence first.

The rehearsal footage i think is actually a sinister twist. It is obvious MJ agreed to be filmed (whatever the reason was) but whether there were ulterior motives that mj was not aware of is still a possibility. You know that footage was probably better than any insurance policy they could get. Again, the motive is hard to prove beyond circumstantial evidence.

On the day of the memorial, the family employed a photographer to document everything. Even backstage with the coffin. To me, although unusual, i am not all that surprised by the burial being filmed. Maybe it is for the children when they are older and feel they need to look back on it. The same with the rest of the family. Perhaps it is there to help them through their ordeal. Who knows on that. Not everyone was laughing or smiling at the burial, but with such glittering company present there was a lot of hob-nobbing going on. There was a photographer at the burial also.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

WendyE

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 04:53:03 PM
Michael Jackson is ALIVE, trust me on that. Even if you take the entire This is It saga out of the mix there is an entire host of things that SCREAM I"M ALIVE! Do the math and nothing adds up. The only conclusion anyone could come to is that Micheal is still here and very much ALIVE.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Sarahli

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 05:59:12 PM
Quote from: "QuirkyDiana"
You all have interesting comments, but if the hoax theory is to gain any credibility you really have to go out there and back up your statements using professional opinions. For example, how do you prove that Jermaine making a statement about his brother's death renders the statement legally or medically invalid? Amir Dan Rubin introduced him. So Amir Dan Rubin - Chief Operating Officer - knowingly allowed Jermaine to make a false statement in his hospital about MJ's death and allowed Jermaine to lie about the treatment his medical staff had given MJ? Is it not possible that Jermaine wanted to do this statement himself? If you really wanted to find out if what Jermaine did made MJ's death invalid you really have to go and ask some questions first. Who says it makes the death invalid? A huge jump in conclusion.

Has anyone actually gone out and proved in a professional manner why all the medical reports are false? Or is that conjecture. You know that TMZ Harvey is a lawyer......he actually said on camera that a small abbreviation or alteration such as Joe/Joseph is of no consequence and does not make something legally invalid. So has anyone checked this out with a lawyer(s) who would know?

What would you class as legally valid proof that MJ died, that has not been released already? If these documents are all false, they have to proven false properly - with backed up evidence first.

The rehearsal footage i think is actually a sinister twist. It is obvious MJ agreed to be filmed (whatever the reason was) but whether there were ulterior motives that mj was not aware of is still a possibility. You know that footage was probably better than any insurance policy they could get. Again, the motive is hard to prove beyond circumstantial evidence.

On the day of the memorial, the family employed a photographer to document everything. Even backstage with the coffin. To me, although unusual, i am not all that surprised by the burial being filmed. Maybe it is for the children when they are older and feel they need to look back on it. The same with the rest of the family. Perhaps it is there to help them through their ordeal. Who knows on that. Not everyone was laughing or smiling at the burial, but with such glittering company present there was a lot of hob-nobbing going on. There was a photographer at the burial also.

If there were blatant and obvious evidences of Michael being alive there would be no hoax in the first place. I mean there is also a big part of intimate conviction here. I think that the only thing that will prove this to be a death hoax will be Michael's return. And as TS mentionned it so well maybe even if Michael came back some people would believe that it's not him....
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
We are here for you Michael and will always love you whatever happens.
'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
"You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them."

somekindofsign

  • Guest
Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 06:00:16 PM
Quote from: "WendyE"
Michael Jackson is ALIVE, trust me on that

What does it mean?

About HD, I´ve stated many times that HD today is normal, more to MJ.
I´ve also explained what an EPK is.
Also that TII can perfectly be ENG, lacks of sophisticated (or regular) filmming statives and tools.
But that´s all we can state from that...
We cannot state anything more from that about the motives to record some other things.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 20, 2010, 07:14:54 PM
In reply to the original comment.

It's michael jackson, one of the most well known faces and person. Doo you think they would miss any moment of his life/death. HD wouldve been taken of tii mainly for DVD bonus features. HD of the funeral, HD of the memorial because ITS MICHAEL JACKSON!!!!
I believe he's alive but HD has nothing to do with it.


Xxx
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 21, 2010, 08:54:47 AM
Quote from: "JukeBox"
Quote from: "UTisNUM1"
That's my two cents, people can't argue the HD filming and they sure can't argue that HD isn't the standard but if it wasn't, things would still be getting shot in SD.

i agree with that, but i think what hoax believers have done is they pointed out a lot of weirdness about the funeral, not just that it's filmed in HD. this point is placed in the context of a seemingly fake setting (i.e. possibly green screened, studio lights etc), people not appearing sad (e.g. Mac Culkin & gf who were smiling/laughing), the row of garbage cans again, the liberian girl photo, etc. all these point towards a hoax, though they may not 100% prove it.

Could somebody fill me in?  What does the liberian girl photo have to do with it being a clue in the hoax?  I don't get it.  Is it because it is an older picture of him?  And even if that's it, how would that emply hoax?  

Not saying it's not a hoax, I believe more that it is, than that it's not, but just didn't get the implication with this photo. :?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 21, 2010, 09:47:41 AM
Quote from: "MeandMyShadow"
Quote from: "JukeBox"
Quote from: "UTisNUM1"
That's my two cents, people can't argue the HD filming and they sure can't argue that HD isn't the standard but if it wasn't, things would still be getting shot in SD.

i agree with that, but i think what hoax believers have done is they pointed out a lot of weirdness about the funeral, not just that it's filmed in HD. this point is placed in the context of a seemingly fake setting (i.e. possibly green screened, studio lights etc), people not appearing sad (e.g. Mac Culkin & gf who were smiling/laughing), the row of garbage cans again, the liberian girl photo, etc. all these point towards a hoax, though they may not 100% prove it.

Could somebody fill me in?  What does the liberian girl photo have to do with it being a clue in the hoax?  I don't get it.  Is it because it is an older picture of him?  And even if that's it, how would that emply hoax?  

Not saying it's not a hoax, I believe more that it is, than that it's not, but just didn't get the implication with this photo. :?



Watch this video it will help you to understand, at the memorial service the photo of Michael appears behind the stage which is from this film.  The photos at the Funeral "Liberian Girl" are from this video film and are promotional photographs for Liberian Girl which was from the "Bad" era.  Do a google search on Liberian Girl you will find more photographs, also another video I found interesting was the "Come Together" by Michael when he was wearing similar clothing as Liberian Girl, its all about symbolism I believe.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  "Come together" Michael Jackson
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Invalid Argument - HD Filming
April 21, 2010, 10:15:48 AM
I'm with Bec on this one.....

Why film the funeral at all.....On one hand they are refraining from putting dates on anythign regarding MJ...be it the film itself, the DVD (all conversations for entertainment purposes :lol: ) or well, his so-called mausoleum as well...Is it so difficult to say "In memoriam" when a family member is really dead? I guess no.....at least not on a grave.

Plus I got a really fishy feeling about the funeral itself....The disappearing trees and roads....people cracking up...I mean that was fishier than the memorial.

So we're not saying that HD filming is an inconsistency...only the intentions with which things are filmed are suspicious....Thats all what it is?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
54 Replies
6865 Views
Last post March 26, 2010, 09:30:13 PM
by Jennie
29 Replies
4720 Views
Last post July 22, 2010, 03:05:08 AM
by MJ_Facts

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal