0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
That's my two cents, people can't argue the HD filming and they sure can't argue that HD isn't the standard but if it wasn't, things would still be getting shot in SD.
You all have interesting comments, but if the hoax theory is to gain any credibility you really have to go out there and back up your statements using professional opinions. For example, how do you prove that Jermaine making a statement about his brother's death renders the statement legally or medically invalid? Amir Dan Rubin introduced him. So Amir Dan Rubin - Chief Operating Officer - knowingly allowed Jermaine to make a false statement in his hospital about MJ's death and allowed Jermaine to lie about the treatment his medical staff had given MJ? Is it not possible that Jermaine wanted to do this statement himself? If you really wanted to find out if what Jermaine did made MJ's death invalid you really have to go and ask some questions first. Who says it makes the death invalid? A huge jump in conclusion.Has anyone actually gone out and proved in a professional manner why all the medical reports are false? Or is that conjecture. You know that TMZ Harvey is a lawyer......he actually said on camera that a small abbreviation or alteration such as Joe/Joseph is of no consequence and does not make something legally invalid. So has anyone checked this out with a lawyer(s) who would know?What would you class as legally valid proof that MJ died, that has not been released already? If these documents are all false, they have to proven false properly - with backed up evidence first.The rehearsal footage i think is actually a sinister twist. It is obvious MJ agreed to be filmed (whatever the reason was) but whether there were ulterior motives that mj was not aware of is still a possibility. You know that footage was probably better than any insurance policy they could get. Again, the motive is hard to prove beyond circumstantial evidence.On the day of the memorial, the family employed a photographer to document everything. Even backstage with the coffin. To me, although unusual, i am not all that surprised by the burial being filmed. Maybe it is for the children when they are older and feel they need to look back on it. The same with the rest of the family. Perhaps it is there to help them through their ordeal. Who knows on that. Not everyone was laughing or smiling at the burial, but with such glittering company present there was a lot of hob-nobbing going on. There was a photographer at the burial also.
Michael Jackson is ALIVE, trust me on that
Quote from: "UTisNUM1"That's my two cents, people can't argue the HD filming and they sure can't argue that HD isn't the standard but if it wasn't, things would still be getting shot in SD.i agree with that, but i think what hoax believers have done is they pointed out a lot of weirdness about the funeral, not just that it's filmed in HD. this point is placed in the context of a seemingly fake setting (i.e. possibly green screened, studio lights etc), people not appearing sad (e.g. Mac Culkin & gf who were smiling/laughing), the row of garbage cans again, the liberian girl photo, etc. all these point towards a hoax, though they may not 100% prove it.
Quote from: "JukeBox"Quote from: "UTisNUM1"That's my two cents, people can't argue the HD filming and they sure can't argue that HD isn't the standard but if it wasn't, things would still be getting shot in SD.i agree with that, but i think what hoax believers have done is they pointed out a lot of weirdness about the funeral, not just that it's filmed in HD. this point is placed in the context of a seemingly fake setting (i.e. possibly green screened, studio lights etc), people not appearing sad (e.g. Mac Culkin & gf who were smiling/laughing), the row of garbage cans again, the liberian girl photo, etc. all these point towards a hoax, though they may not 100% prove it.Could somebody fill me in? What does the liberian girl photo have to do with it being a clue in the hoax? I don't get it. Is it because it is an older picture of him? And even if that's it, how would that emply hoax? Not saying it's not a hoax, I believe more that it is, than that it's not, but just didn't get the implication with this photo. :?
Started by DancingTheDream « 1 2 3 4 » Dr. Conrad Murray
Started by Bee Bee « 1 2 » Michael's features, habits & disguises