avatar_2good2btrue

02 Double again seen at Dr's Kleins office on 18th June 2009

Started by 2good2btrue, April 16, 2010, 10:43:56 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Tina K.

April 20, 2010, 11:35:21 AM #60 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "the arabian nights"

Quote from: "Jacksonology"

and that's not Michael. It's Impersonator Michael Kiss. this was de-bunked before. he is also red pants in TII. it's been de-bunked on .net

are you saying that this pix is not mike, but he was with the kids?
This IS Michael. Look at his fingers ;)

Michael I love you allways.

THE JACKSONOLOGIST

April 20, 2010, 11:40:57 AM #61 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I think this is Mike as well.


MJJ1982

April 20, 2010, 12:25:28 PM #62 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "THE JACKSONOLOGIST"

I think this is Mike as well.

Me too.

And I really don't believe that it was Michael Kiss in TII, he doesn't even look like rp Michael to me....

\'Just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel\'

\'A star can never die. It just turns into a smile and melts back into the cosmic music, the Dance of Life\'
You\'re just another part of me... I love YOU more...

Kuki

April 20, 2010, 01:24:15 PM #63 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

All Michael to me.

Proud member of Michael\'s army of L.O.V.E.!

The Truth Isn\'t Waiting To Be Found. It\'s Waiting To Be BeLIEved.


reasonables+luvs+MJ

April 25, 2010, 01:47:43 AM #64 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

okay, I believe that it's a glove on his RIGHT hand, but here are 2 things I don't get:
1 if it's a glove, how are the fingernails attached?
2 why is he wearing a glove that "almost" match his skin tone?
I'm so confused :!:  :roll:  :shock:  :o  :(  :?  :|  :?:

C--ontains
O--ptional
I--nformation
N--ot
C--razy
I--ncidents
D--emanding
E--motional
N--aive
C--razed
E--nforcements


-----------------------------------

b--elieving
e--verything
L--ike
I--nconsistent
E--vidence
v--aries
i--n
n--umerous
g--enres


------------------------------------

If you would just \'Hold my Hand\', together we can cause \'Breaking News\', because we will find out who is \'Behind the Mask\'. --reason

Datroot

April 25, 2010, 05:51:43 AM #65 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "reasonables+luvs+MJ"

okay, I believe that it's a glove on his RIGHT hand, but here are 2 things I don't get:
1 if it's a glove, how are the fingernails attached?
2 why is he wearing a glove that "almost" match his skin tone?
I'm so confused :!:  :roll:  :shock:  :o  :(  :?  :|  :?:

Same here - it really does look like a very thin glove and, if it's not photoshopped, what was the reason for it? :?:


I'M A LOVER, NOT A FIGHTER

Jacksonology

April 25, 2010, 07:52:07 AM #66 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Datroot"

Quote from: "reasonables+luvs+MJ"

okay, I believe that it's a glove on his RIGHT hand, but here are 2 things I don't get:
1 if it's a glove, how are the fingernails attached?
2 why is he wearing a glove that "almost" match his skin tone?
I'm so confused :!:  :roll:  :shock:  :o  :(  :?  :|  :?:

Same here - it really does look like a very thin glove and, if it's not photoshopped, what was the reason for it? :?:

to tell us who's the real deal and who's not.


MJ_Facts

July 18, 2010, 03:59:01 AM #67 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

NO GLOVES AT ALL BUT THIN AND DEHYDRATED IMO  :cry:


teerockjelli

July 18, 2010, 04:28:39 AM #68 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

aw it is no double it is MJ at o2, I can see his boyish familiarity in his smile in the first pic of the thread...  :)


tabloidburn

July 18, 2010, 10:52:24 AM #69 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

again:
the o2 guy/ hand issue was widely discussed, like somewhere in here: viewtopic.php?f=99&t=6415

about the 'glove': as already stated correctly, mike is skinny and very possibly seriously dehydrated. when you hit a certain age (like 40+), your hands will make such a line by themselves when you 'do the V'. i am also very skinny and tend to dehydrate, so i could take a pic of my own hand, do the V and it will look just like that. no glove, no trick, no photoshop. 'it's called AGING' (unquote).

:mrgreen:

just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel - mj 2003

i have incredible disguises, i can fool my own mother - mj 1988

...details at eleven...

wear something green!

proud member of the army of l.o.v.e!

nefari

July 21, 2010, 06:42:04 AM #70 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Hmmm could it be Dave Dave? And what we see here are made up fingers/hands/skin etc..... and maybe Dave Dave died and not Michael.

]

OneLove

July 22, 2010, 05:05:54 PM #71 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

What about the ears? I'm going to make a thread later regarding this.


Serenitys_Dream

July 22, 2010, 05:12:59 PM #72 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "OneLove"

What about the ears? I'm going to make a thread later regarding this.

Please don't the ears, the nose, the hands... the everything has already been dissected and discussed numerous times.

We will not agree on this.


mumof3

July 22, 2010, 05:46:47 PM #73 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

well after many months looking at the 02 pictures of michael I think it is Michael but it does look like he has very thin gloves on and if you watch the Jackson dynasty programes I have notices that Jermaine when he is out and touches handles on doors he gets out a tissue to open the door with so just maybe after all  the touring and mixing with millions of people shaking hands and being kissed by them they feel they have to protect themselves so maybe it is for hygene reasons remember Michael was worried about swine flu


OneLove

July 22, 2010, 07:19:08 PM #74 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Serenitys_Dream"

Quote from: "OneLove"

What about the ears? I'm going to make a thread later regarding this.

Please don't the ears, the nose, the hands... the everything has already been dissected and discussed numerous times.

We will not agree on this.

How have the ears been debunked? I must have missed that one.

Similar topics (5)