The real deal...at least that's what we think

[~Souza~]

OK, so people asked us who we think is the real MJ, since we think O2 dude is not Mike.

We used Mike's picture from 1977 to compare the faces, because most of you want proof, instead of just us telling you what we think. It's a hell of a job, but here are some real ones from the BAD era (although we have doubts that the Come Together yellow shirt one is really from the BAD era, because it looks more recent, but that aside). Let's see if you all agree this is the real deal, because maybe we think the double is the real deal, you just never know.










It's not on each pic an EXACT match, but that's because of the angles <!-- s;) --><!-- s;) --> but as you can see, "The Eyes Have It". Besides that, the mouth, nose, ears, chin are all in the right place, DESPITE the angle differences.

My question now is, is this the real deal? 

[Raven]

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

[~Souza~]

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

You are seriously starting to annoy me Raven, I ask a serious question here. You can either answer in a normal way, or stay away from the double threads.

[Raven]

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

You are seriously starting to annoy me Raven, I ask a serious question here. You can either answer in a normal way, or stay away from the double threads.

This is not a doubles thread.

Why is it annoying...as I'm doing the same you did.

When I said it was Michael himself you also replied it was a double with a mask on, and I also noted along the lines it started to become annoying. What's the difference?

[naomifury]

I'm confused...are you saying that the pictures used above are not all MJ or that they are?

[MissG]

Wow!

The eyes are the mirror of the soul. Both pics ( 77-87) has the same eyes.

[loveratheart4mj]

They're all Michael. PERIOD.

[Tink.I.Am]

the last one looks to match the best.... ohh its hard...

[~Souza~]

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

You are seriously starting to annoy me Raven, I ask a serious question here. You can either answer in a normal way, or stay away from the double threads.

This is not a double thread.

Why is it annoying...as I'm doing the same you did.

When I said it was Michael himself you also replied it was a double with a mask on, and I also noted along the lines it started to become annoying. What's the difference?

The difference is that I compare pics and you just say "It's Michael Jackson". O2 dude can't be compared, we have no eyes. If try to compare O2 dude's mouth is already too wide. A good comparison is impossible with the glasses on.

I am done with people like you just 'stating their opinion', ridiculing others without any arguments. I had the discussion with mykidsmum as well, but she at least posts her own comparisons. You are only stirring the threads up. If you don't think there were doubles and you will not contribute to the thread proving us wrong, just stay away from these threads.

'Nuff said...

[~Souza~]

They're all Michael. PERIOD.

Maybe I wasn't really clear in my post, I said we think all the above pics are INDEED Mike...

[~Souza~]

I'm confused...are you saying that the pictures used above are not all MJ or that they are?

I am saying we think all the above pictures are Mike.

[naomifury]

I'm confused...are you saying that the pictures used above are not all MJ or that they are?

I am saying we think all the above pictures are Mike.

Alright, thanks for clarifying.  This is random, but do you and Mo always refer in posts as "we" instead of "I". I just noticed it and was curious lol.

[*Mo*]

I'm confused...are you saying that the pictures used above are not all MJ or that they are?

I am saying we think all the above pictures are Mike.

Alright, thanks for clarifying.  This is random, but do you and Mo always refer in posts as "we" instead of "I". I just noticed it and was curious lol.

We do when we share the same opinion.  Then it's easier if one of us just writes "we", instead of us each posting a separate message saying "I".

[Raven]

@Souza I think it's all a double with a prosthetic mask on.

You are seriously starting to annoy me Raven, I ask a serious question here. You can either answer in a normal way, or stay away from the double threads.

This is not a double thread.

Why is it annoying...as I'm doing the same you did.

When I said it was Michael himself you also replied it was a double with a mask on, and I also noted along the lines it started to become annoying. What's the difference?

The difference is that I compare pics and you just say "It's Michael Jackson". O2 dude can't be compared, we have no eyes. If try to compare O2 dude's mouth is already too wide. A good comparison is impossible with the glasses on.

I am done with people like you just 'stating their opinion', ridiculing others without any arguments. I had the discussion with mykidsmum as well, but she at least posts her own comparisons. You are only stirring the threads up. If you don't think there were doubles and you will not contribute to the thread proving us wrong, just stay away from these threads.

'Nuff said...

Ow I've given enough arguments, it's not true what you say. I've mentioned the scar near his lower lip. I've mentioned scars on his chin. I've mentioned the scar on his cheek. I've reposted a picture of yours that you used for comparison in black and white you couldn't get to match because it was in mirror-image. But you've all done away with them as 'that can be artificially added' or 'it's a prosthetic mask'.

[~Souza~]

I'm confused...are you saying that the pictures used above are not all MJ or that they are?

I am saying we think all the above pictures are Mike.

Alright, thanks for clarifying.  This is random, but do you and Mo always refer in posts as "we" instead of "I". I just noticed it and was curious lol.

No, not always.