0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 01:44:23 PM
SIMPLY WAS STATING MY OPINION.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
   
~[size=150]HEAL THE WORLD[/size]~
i march to the beat of MJs drum

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 04:17:06 PM
It's not the theme, but whenever i see this Mug shot i wonder why there only stands Michael Jackson on this card..not Joe, not Joseph....only Michael and when it was official...because in the FBI Files he was Michael Joe....i can't understand why only Michael....
Have you more informations ?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 07:56:05 PM
Stress made MJ drop weight at a rate of knots...    i have the same thing.  I can eat like a horse, but if i am stressed out then the weight will drop.  I can literally lose a stone in a week.  

So MJ being a good weight and then dropping dramatically after his arrest doesnt surprise me.
He did the same thing with his weight in TII.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 08:10:24 PM
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "MJJ1982"


I think it's him, just like said before they don't take beautiful pictures because it's not a professional photoshoot  ;)
And to be honest, I don't think that I look at my best when they arrest me.


I have serious doubts, it doesn't look like him. The eyes are off, the mouth is off. Either it's not him, or the one I have in mind being the real deal is a double, who knows. Same with the one that showed the bruises on his arm. He was skinny as hell, while Mike was at good weight back then.

What I think is odd about this mugshot as well is that his hair is covering a big part of his face. I'm not sure what the rules are for mugshots in the US, but here you have to keep your hair back, it's not supposed to cover up a part of your face.

Souza,
I agree with you!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Michael Supporter
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
~Mahatma Gandhi

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 08:17:42 PM
Has anyone ever dyed their hair with a dark dye and not been really careful about getting the dye off the scalp at the hairline????  That is what first comes to mind when I see pics of anything that remotely looks like a tatoo at the front scalp line.

I definitely am not an expert on wigs etc. but a part of me wants to think that perhaps MJ died his hair to cover the white that vitiligo naturally causes. No one ever talks of this aspect---but I know vitiligo and it not only effects the melanin of the skin but of the hair too!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Michael Supporter
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
~Mahatma Gandhi

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 08:58:58 PM
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "MJJ1982"


I think it's him, just like said before they don't take beautiful pictures because it's not a professional photoshoot  ;)
And to be honest, I don't think that I look at my best when they arrest me.


I have serious doubts, it doesn't look like him. The eyes are off, the mouth is off. Either it's not him, or the one I have in mind being the real deal is a double, who knows. Same with the one that showed the bruises on his arm. He was skinny as hell, while Mike was at good weight back then.

What I think is odd about this mugshot as well is that his hair is covering a big part of his face. I'm not sure what the rules are for mugshots in the US, but here you have to keep your hair back, it's not supposed to cover up a part of your face.
His make-up is tatooed on .
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

wilds

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 09:57:27 PM
Michael Jackson's ex publicist, Raymone Bain, and tennis star Serena Williams both agree Michael was wearing a disguise!

In the September 2009 issue of Sister 2 Sister Magazine, Raymone Bain did an interview where she spoke about how she became Michael's right hand woman during the 2005 trial. She and Serena Williams, whom Raymone worked for at the time, visited Michael at Neverland. He liked her so much he asked her to come and work for him. Raymone explained how the night she and Serena visited with Michael, he was very handsome. Then, the next day, they saw Michael on CNN going into court and looking completely different from just the night before! They both agreed Michael was wearing a disguise. Now if these two women who were just with the man the whole day and night before don't even recognise him the next day then we know something is wrong! I scanned that part of the article. The larger photos of the whole page were too big to post here.. if anyone wants to see them.

page1
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login



Page 2
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


*

RK

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 10:46:48 PM
Thanyou for this post. It is new to me and the possibilities going through my mind are boundless.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 12, 2010, 11:40:24 PM
Thank you! This clears up a lot in my mind about that mug shot. I always wondered why there would be this picture that was sooo off from the Michael we usually see. I believe he was in disguise. Way to go Michael! I love your sense of humor :)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 13, 2010, 02:12:12 AM
I have yet to see any celebrity mug shot that looks decent.  Most of them be looking tore up to be honest.  I think it's him.  He would have to be really brave to send an impersonator to fill in when he is suppose to be turning himself in to the police.  I doubt if he would do that.  He's in full make up because MJ turned himself in voluntarily.  I just think the photo is unflattering.  We've all had bad photos before.  It trips me out how the height on the mugshot says 5'11 but on the autopsy report 5'9.  So he shrunk since 2005?  Okay.....
Last Edit: April 13, 2010, 05:43:27 AM by msteetee34
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


Re: Mikes mug shot
April 13, 2010, 02:31:13 AM
unfortunately I think this one is the real deal  :( ... I think it would have been too much of a gambble to send in a double, 4 a photo that he knew would be shown all over the world...but what do I know  :cry:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 13, 2010, 05:03:45 AM
I would prefer to think that this is a double because "MJ" looks like crap in this picture.  :lol:

Quote from: "MJJ1982"


I think it's him, just like said before they don't take beautiful pictures because it's not a professional photoshoot  ;)
And to be honest, I don't think that I look at my best when they arrest me.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 13, 2010, 07:28:10 AM
Quote from: "~Souza~"
Quote from: "MJJ1982"


I think it's him, just like said before they don't take beautiful pictures because it's not a professional photoshoot  ;)
And to be honest, I don't think that I look at my best when they arrest me.


I have serious doubts, it doesn't look like him. The eyes are off, the mouth is off. Either it's not him, or the one I have in mind being the real deal is a double, who knows. Same with the one that showed the bruises on his arm. He was skinny as hell, while Mike was at good weight back then.

What I think is odd about this mugshot as well is that his hair is covering a big part of his face. I'm not sure what the rules are for mugshots in the US, but here you have to keep your hair back, it's not supposed to cover up a part of your face.

How do we know this is a real mugshot anyways? Did we see it in any official document or on an official website?
Could've been made up by anybody with some little graphic skills by adding seal and personal data.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
________________________________________________________
A revolution without dancing is a revolution not worth having.
________________________________________________________


Re: Mikes mug shot
April 13, 2010, 07:38:30 AM
I was browsing other mugshots - very hard to tell, which are legit and which aren't.
Do we know for sure he wore a white shirt under his black jacket that day?

Sorry, off topic.
Oh, I love this man... Even on a mug shot most stylish and classy.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
________________________________________________________
A revolution without dancing is a revolution not worth having.
________________________________________________________


*

MJJ1982

Re: Mikes mug shot
April 13, 2010, 07:50:53 AM
Quote from: "GirlSaturday"
I would prefer to think that this is a double because "MJ" looks like crap in this picture.  :lol:

Quote from: "MJJ1982"


I think it's him, just like said before they don't take beautiful pictures because it's not a professional photoshoot  ;)
And to be honest, I don't think that I look at my best when they arrest me.

You're right, looking at this pic makes me want to believe in doubles  ;) but I really think it's him though..
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
\'Just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel\'

\'A star can never die. It just turns into a smile and melts back into the cosmic music, the Dance of Life\'
You\'re just another part of me... I love YOU more...

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
8 Replies
2195 Views
Last post February 02, 2010, 10:39:13 AM
by MJLOVER32
1 Replies
903 Views
Last post February 02, 2010, 03:28:10 PM
by mollyfaithxo
6 Replies
1502 Views
Last post February 06, 2010, 12:42:25 PM
by Michaelangela
6 Replies
2089 Views
Last post April 07, 2010, 09:38:18 PM
by Jennie
7 Replies
2318 Views
Last post May 01, 2010, 12:02:28 PM
by Puff

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal