The Kids have Doubles to...

[Jacksonology]

Jacksonology , I understand what he says, can be a matter of safety, .. PEACE :mrgreen:

yes. and the people that say ''oh but why would Michael put other kids in danger'' have you heard of Child Actors? plus they had security. so it would of been safe for the Doubles. but IMHO, i don't think Michael didn't want to expose his kids to those type of enviorments. paparazzi chasing him, people screaming ontop of eachother, lights flashing EVERYWHERE. Mobbing s. especially in at a young age. so Doubles would of worked for SOME public appearances.

[Loveneverfeltsogood]

Jacksonology , I understand what he says, can be a matter of safety, .. PEACE :mrgreen:

yes. and the people that say ''oh but why would Michael put other kids in danger'' have you heard of Child Actors? plus they had security. so it would of been safe for the Doubles. but IMHO, i don't think Michael didn't want to expose his kids to those type of enviorments. paparazzi chasing him, people screaming ontop of eachother, lights flashing EVERYWHERE. Mobbing s. especially in at a young age. so Doubles would of worked for SOME public appearances.

I'm gonna ask again: why couldn't he go alone? there is no need to go with kids if anyway the real ones are at home.

[THE JACKSONOLOGIST]

I think those children were told at a very early age WHO their dad is and what he does. They are very aware of it in his home vids. They had experienced alot of paps and people mobbing MJ. He only veiled them because he didnt want people to see their faces for fear of kidnapping etc.

and if it was safe for the DOUBLES, then why wouldnt it be safe for his real kids?

Again, I dont think the kids had doubles. As far as MJ goes,, Im still on the fence about it, but I do not think those kids had doubles.

[paula-c]

Loveneverfeltsogood,  Well, Shortly Before The "death" of Michae all saw pictures of Children, Then her father "dies", They Have to go to the Memorial and Then the funeral. As his father "not" They make a normal life, many times we Have Heard La Toya and Other Family Members Saying That the Children make a normal life like Any Other historical age boy, "PLEASE DO NOT WANT TO misunderstand me, I DO NOT WANT TO SAY THAT MICHAEL NOT have a normal life, "contrary to BELIEVE THAT GAVE THEIR CHILDREN MICHAEL A FOSTER Envy, full of courage. PEACE

[paula-c]

are theories, also if you did I will not question, are their children's life .. we must remember what he lived. :geek:

[Jacksonology]

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

[THE JACKSONOLOGIST]

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

[Jacksonology]

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

one is taller then the other. and the end of the ears are different. one is pointier and curvier. one is just round.

[Dancing_Machine]

I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!

If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!

Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.

Name a few please. If you judge us and say we are ridiculous, we would like to know WHY.

I never said anyone is ridiculous, I said the theory is.

You can find one of the reasons in my previous post and I already gave enough reasons in other double threads. I'm not going to repeat myself.

[MJJ1982]

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

I can't see it either.

[Jacksonology]

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

I can't see it either.

:roll:  :roll: ONE IS LONGER, ONE IS SHORTER. ONE IS POINTER AT THE END AND THE SHAPE OF THE EAR IS DYNAMIC. ONE IS JUST ROUND AND THE TIP ISN'T POINTY.

[MJJ1982]

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

I can't see it either.

:roll:  :roll: ONE IS LONGER, ONE IS SHORTER. ONE IS POINTER AT THE END AND THE SHAPE OF THE EAR IS DYNAMIC. ONE IS JUST ROUND AND THE TIP ISN'T POINTY.

You don't have to use caps, it looks like you're shouting.
The left ear looks blurry to me, so I can't see the difference. I don't think a blurry picture proofs anything, but that's my opinion.

[Jacksonology]

tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.

[frogh777]

tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.

`
I see... uhmm?

[Jacksonology]

tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.

`
I see... uhmm?

one is longer. and the shapes are different.