The Kids have Doubles to...

Started by Jacksonology, April 10, 2010, 03:40:00 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
The first post content
http://www.lipstickalley.com/f227/blanket-picture-thread-198124/index80.html here is a thread about a possible blanket impersonator! wow even the kids have there own doubles! don't say ''oh it's lighting, oh angle of picture'' he is only 8 years old. He can only change but so much....

  Link

JacksonologyTopic starter

April 12, 2010, 12:37:54 PM #105 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "paula-c"

Jacksonology , I understand what he says, can be a matter of safety, .. PEACE :mrgreen:

yes. and the people that say ''oh but why would Michael put other kids in danger'' have you heard of Child Actors? plus they had security. so it would of been safe for the Doubles. but IMHO, i don't think Michael didn't want to expose his kids to those type of enviorments. paparazzi chasing him, people screaming ontop of eachother, lights flashing EVERYWHERE. Mobbing s. especially in at a young age. so Doubles would of worked for SOME public appearances.


Loveneverfeltsogood

April 12, 2010, 12:40:53 PM #106 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Jacksonology"

Quote from: "paula-c"

Jacksonology , I understand what he says, can be a matter of safety, .. PEACE :mrgreen:

yes. and the people that say ''oh but why would Michael put other kids in danger'' have you heard of Child Actors? plus they had security. so it would of been safe for the Doubles. but IMHO, i don't think Michael didn't want to expose his kids to those type of enviorments. paparazzi chasing him, people screaming ontop of eachother, lights flashing EVERYWHERE. Mobbing s. especially in at a young age. so Doubles would of worked for SOME public appearances.

I'm gonna ask again: why couldn't he go alone? there is no need to go with kids if anyway the real ones are at home.

"For what is a man, what has he got?
If not himself, then he has naught.
To say the things he truly feels
And not the words of one who kneels
The record shows I took the blows
And did it my way..."

THE JACKSONOLOGIST

April 12, 2010, 12:45:45 PM #107 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I think those children were told at a very early age WHO their dad is and what he does. They are very aware of it in his home vids. They had experienced alot of paps and people mobbing MJ. He only veiled them because he didnt want people to see their faces for fear of kidnapping etc.

and if it was safe for the DOUBLES, then why wouldnt it be safe for his real kids?

Again, I dont think the kids had doubles. As far as MJ goes,, Im still on the fence about it, but I do not think those kids had doubles.


paula-c

April 12, 2010, 12:54:19 PM #108 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Loveneverfeltsogood,  Well, Shortly Before The "death" of Michae all saw pictures of Children, Then her father "dies", They Have to go to the Memorial and Then the funeral. As his father "not" They make a normal life, many times we Have Heard La Toya and Other Family Members Saying That the Children make a normal life like Any Other historical age boy, "PLEASE DO NOT WANT TO misunderstand me, I DO NOT WANT TO SAY THAT MICHAEL NOT have a normal life, "contrary to BELIEVE THAT GAVE THEIR CHILDREN MICHAEL A FOSTER Envy, full of courage. PEACE ;)


paula-c

April 12, 2010, 01:08:41 PM #109 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

are theories, also if you did I will not question, are their children's life .. we must remember what he lived. :geek:


JacksonologyTopic starter

April 12, 2010, 01:16:38 PM #110 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....


THE JACKSONOLOGIST

April 12, 2010, 01:38:53 PM #111 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Jacksonology"

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.


JacksonologyTopic starter

April 12, 2010, 01:49:14 PM #112 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "THE JACKSONOLOGIST"

Quote from: "Jacksonology"

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

one is taller then the other. and the end of the ears are different. one is pointier and curvier. one is just round.


Dancing_Machine

April 12, 2010, 02:02:44 PM #113 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "~Souza~"

Quote from: "Dancing_Machine"

I can't believe the things I read in this thread. To me the doubles theory is ridiculous enough but I can't believe you're picking on the children now. They're just children!

If you really claim the children have their own doubles; who's children are those doubles? Do you really think someone would let their children be used as doubles for someone else's kids and Michael would aprove of that?!

Face the reality: the doubles theory is impossible for so many reasons.

Name a few please. If you judge us and say we are ridiculous, we would like to know WHY.

I never said anyone is ridiculous, I said the theory is.

You can find one of the reasons in my previous post and I already gave enough reasons in other double threads. I'm not going to repeat myself.


Let\'s not forget...

MJJ1982

April 12, 2010, 02:04:44 PM #114 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "THE JACKSONOLOGIST"

Quote from: "Jacksonology"

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

I can't see it either.
\'Just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel\'

\'A star can never die. It just turns into a smile and melts back into the cosmic music, the Dance of Life\'
You\'re just another part of me... I love YOU more...

JacksonologyTopic starter

April 12, 2010, 02:13:24 PM #115 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "MJJ1982"

Quote from: "THE JACKSONOLOGIST"

Quote from: "Jacksonology"

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

I can't see it either.

:roll:  :roll: ONE IS LONGER, ONE IS SHORTER. ONE IS POINTER AT THE END AND THE SHAPE OF THE EAR IS DYNAMIC. ONE IS JUST ROUND AND THE TIP ISN'T POINTY.


MJJ1982

April 12, 2010, 02:15:54 PM #116 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Jacksonology"

Quote from: "MJJ1982"

Quote from: "THE JACKSONOLOGIST"

Quote from: "Jacksonology"

new comparison: I think we can agree that these ears are different....

I really cannot see a difference. The one on the left may be slightly diff then the one on the right cus she is wearing glasses.

I can't see it either.

:roll:  :roll: ONE IS LONGER, ONE IS SHORTER. ONE IS POINTER AT THE END AND THE SHAPE OF THE EAR IS DYNAMIC. ONE IS JUST ROUND AND THE TIP ISN'T POINTY.

You don't have to use caps, it looks like you're shouting.
The left ear looks blurry to me, so I can't see the difference. I don't think a blurry picture proofs anything, but that's my opinion.
\'Just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel\'

\'A star can never die. It just turns into a smile and melts back into the cosmic music, the Dance of Life\'
You\'re just another part of me... I love YOU more...

JacksonologyTopic starter

April 12, 2010, 02:19:20 PM #117 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.


frogh777

April 12, 2010, 02:20:40 PM #118 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Jacksonology"

tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.

`
I see... uhmm?


JacksonologyTopic starter

April 12, 2010, 02:22:57 PM #119 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "frogh777"

Quote from: "Jacksonology"

tried my best to trace. but you should be able to see the differences.

`
I see... uhmm?

one is longer. and the shapes are different.


Similar topics (5)