With much respect to you all:
I've stated my opinion on the photos that were in the first post. My eyes tell me, at this stage, that it is the same man, and different angles based upon my own experiments and using my own logic.
Perhaps if the people who believe otherwise can find more evidence by using other photos of Murray then I'd be more inclined to rethink my current opinion. And, perhaps others here will rethink it too. If you believe this then please show me I'm wrong with more evidence. If he really has a double then there
must be more evidence in other photos. I must say I would find it interesting if more evidence can be shown - but as of yet I just haven't seen anything that convinces me enough in this thread.