Watch it

[koulio02]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

first 2002
second : 2007 :
 
Watch the face mike.
is identical
Photo of 2007 was rigged

sorry for my english
L.O.V.E
KOULIO02  from france

[the arabian nights]

sorry dont understand

[koulio02]

sorry dont understand

the right picture is photoshop

michael's face is the same on photos

the true picture is from 2002

[imissMJ147]

It's great that you found this but how is this significant.? Like I mean to the hoax how is it important.? Great find though

[katooooooo]

the photoshopped one is the pic from 2002. Look closely to it. E'cas is the same too in each pic...he have the same shirt and the same hat...it's not hard with photoshop to close a mouth or change the hat form... I work a lot on photoshop and illustrator on the past and i am pretty sure the fake one is the 2002.

[koulio02]

the photoshopped one is the pic from 2002. Look closely to it. E'cas is the same too in each pic...he have the same shirt and the same hat...it's not hard with photoshop to close a mouth or change the hat form... I work a lot on photoshop and illustrator on the past and i am pretty sure the fake one is the 2002.

look closely at the face of michael

is that mike was added to the photo of 2007
Photo of 2002 is true.

casanova wants us to believe that 2007 is real.
but the 2007 is false.

I'm sorry
I can not make myself understood.

all I can say.
e-casanova is lying

édit :
I explain in French
if someone can translate .

e-casanova a fait paraitre la photo en pretendant qu'elle date de 2007 .
Or , en réalité elle date de 2002 . Vous pouvez aisement constater que le visage de mike est le meme sur les deux photos .
je vous rappel que e-casanova a anonncé en 2007 etre atteint d'une maladie grave .
son message a vite été retiré de son blog . aujourd'hui il tente de montrer par cette photo qu'il est en pleine forme en 2007 . Mais cette photo ne date pas de 2007 mais bien de 2002 ...

true picture:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

fake:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[katooooooo]

what I mean: i think the picture ''2007'' has been taken in 2002and it's a real picture. but the pic with ''2002''on it is fake...too much photoshop...hard to explain this in english...la photo qui est indiqué 2007, c'est la bonne photo, la vraie, mais elle a été prise en 2002. Mais la photo sur laquelle il est indiqué 2002, c'est un montage. Ca se voit a l'oeil...

[the arabian nights]

why would he lie

[somekindofsign]

I don´t know when this photo was taken, but onething is for sure, the second one is more real than the first one...

[koulio02]

why would he lie

his health  8-)

[mjjveritas]

I wish there was a concrete way of knowing whether a picture is Photoshopped or not. It is very tiresome not knowing if something is real or not. I'm not just meaning within the hoax but in general. From models in magazines to Members of Parliament in the UK for their official promotional photos. Everything is fake nowadays. We'll really be in trouble when technology exists when "live" tv can be altered.

[VeryLittleSusie]

I feel like my whole existence was fake...  :shock:

[Tink.I.Am]

the photoshopped one is the pic from 2002. Look closely to it. E'cas is the same too in each pic...he have the same shirt and the same hat...it's not hard with photoshop to close a mouth or change the hat form... I work a lot on photoshop and illustrator on the past and i am pretty sure the fake one is the 2002.

exatly... both pics are from 2002   real or not...

[Kirsche]

I think these are the same photos, but the "2002" photo was edited with Photoshop (Background E'cas' Face)...But I don't know how this should be related to the hoax