Quote from: "Raven"
Quote from: "kdkennedy74"Another thing that I think about is the autopsy report for example, the fact that fingerprints were not used to ID the body but yet they were on file.
The AR DOES mention fingerprints were used, it's on page 1.
Yes it does state that fingerprints were obtained but on page 3, at the bottom, it states under Identification:
"The body was positively identified as Michael Joseph Jackson by visual comparison to his California Drivers License on 06/25/09"
If I have missed something please let me know because this is one of the things that has been bothering me. I also remember watching a report where they interviewed someone from the coroner's office and it was stated that they did not use fingerprints in identifying MJ because they had his driver's license as positive ID. I can't remember what I was watching but I know it has been discussed on here in another thread as well.