The Official Double Thread

[*Mo*]

and I agree that Dave on LKL was a totally different ball game altogether...You could get vibes from the moment he appeared on the screen that this COULD be MJ in disgiuse.....How? Because of his general body language, his eyes and most importantly his voice.

Right, and I didn't get those vibes from the majority of "Mikes" in this is it, neither did their body language resemble his, leave alone the eyes.  As for the voice: lip syncing or the use of a Harmonizer.

[Jacksonology]

How do you explain the fact that the supposed double was singing in the film?

Orange pants MJ was singing (WBSS, Speechless, Human Nature, Smooth Criminal, TWYMMF

Red shirt MJ was singing (WBSS, Human Nature, TWYMMF, J5 medley

Shoulder-pads jacket MJ was singing (human nature, IJCSLY

Gold pants MJ was singing (Human Nature)

Gold Jacket MJ was singing (I'll be there)

Billie Jean + MITM also had live bits to them...

So unless there were MJ doubles who also shared the same ability to sing, then how do you explain that?

Lipsync

[GoOoF]

How do you explain the fact that the supposed double was singing in the film?

Orange pants MJ was singing (WBSS, Speechless, Human Nature, Smooth Criminal, TWYMMF

Red shirt MJ was singing (WBSS, Human Nature, TWYMMF, J5 medley

Shoulder-pads jacket MJ was singing (human nature, IJCSLY

Gold pants MJ was singing (Human Nature)

Gold Jacket MJ was singing (I'll be there)

Billie Jean + MITM also had live bits to them...

So unless there were MJ doubles who also shared the same ability to sing, then how do you explain that?

They didn't sing live.

[Dancing_Machine]

And do you think that's a nice thing that u don't even see the differences between MJ and a double? 8-)

All because I say a man who appears to be Michael, is Michael?  :roll:

It's like saying this isn't Janet, because she looks different that she did in the '90s.

Janet from the 90's:



Looks like the same gal!

Exactly, the same girl. Even though she looks older and a bit different it's the same person.

Same thing with Michael.

[~Souza~]

How do you explain the fact that the supposed double was singing in the film?

Orange pants MJ was singing (WBSS, Speechless, Human Nature, Smooth Criminal, TWYMMF

Red shirt MJ was singing (WBSS, Human Nature, TWYMMF, J5 medley

Shoulder-pads jacket MJ was singing (human nature, IJCSLY

Gold pants MJ was singing (Human Nature)

Gold Jacket MJ was singing (I'll be there)

Billie Jean + MITM also had live bits to them...

So unless there were MJ doubles who also shared the same ability to sing, then how do you explain that?

They didn't sing live.

Nope agreed. Like I said before: The audio is uncut, the footage changes.

[~Souza~]

And do you think that's a nice thing that u don't even see the differences between MJ and a double? 8-)

All because I say a man who appears to be Michael, is Michael?  :roll:

It's like saying this isn't Janet, because she looks different that she did in the '90s.

Janet from the 90's:



Looks like the same gal!

Exactly, the same girl. Even though she looks older and a bit different it's the same person.

Same thing with Michael.

Oh really? Let me throw them in again:

Mike 1989, Mike 2005, Mike 2009:


Mike 1989, Mike 2005, ? 2009:

[KeepTheFaith]

Wait a minute! where is this 3. picture from? it is not in TII as i remember, so it could be edited.


and all Michael btw

[MJ_92_Believe]

You honestly think that WBSS, IJCSLY, Human Nature etc. were lipsynched?

Human Nature certainly wasn't - and the audio adds up. Obviously, there's going to have to be some changes in the audio to allow for the different shots but....let's just keep our feet on the ground.

And another question is - WHY?

I can almost understand why doubles would be used in dance routines like Smooth Criminal to allow the other dancers to practise properly - but what would be the point in solo songs like Human Nature and Billie Jean?

If the band needed practice then they could do it perfectly well without MJ.

[Doctor Death]

Theres a VEEEERY simple explanation to all the stuff taht you feel was LIP SYNCHED.


You see, those were rehearsals, not live concerts....So its quite obvious that there were more than ONE verisons of the same song rehearsed...Some of them, maybe, were better than the others or sounded better than the others...In saying that I am not criticizing MJ's ability to sing.....It could be that there were some minor glitches in some of the versions, say for example, a musician misses a note or a drummer misses a beat....or MJ missed a word..can happen...always happens..even with great singers....No problem, they're just rehhearsals.

So its quite obvious that the best of those versions were included in the movie but the footage included was from all the rehearsals including the faulty ones....So maybe the words didnt match the lips al the time...Not reason enough to get paranoid....And this can hppen irrespective of wether doublees were used or not.

[~Souza~]

Wait a minute! where is this 3. picture from? it is not in TII as i remember, so it could be edited.


and all Michael btw

Well if that 3rd one is Mike, then these 3 must all be impostors:

[iMJacksonfaN]

Look at the eyes

[iMJacksonfaN]

Don't tell me that the first picture is an imposter  :roll:

BTW..

I know we're in 2010, but not everything is possible like..

*Surgeries from already 1980's, to look like Michael 100%.
*Use 4 identical imposters, that we haven't seen for the last 8 months,

Girls, try to go outside without make up.
You will ofcourse look different, don't fool yourselves. Michael either used stage make-up, or nothing.

[~Souza~]

Look at the eyes

I did, and they don't match ToM. Mike's eyes are almond shaped, '? 2009''s eyes are much rounder.

[rowdyangel]

Let's face it, we're not all going to agree.  The world would be a boring place if we all agreed with everything.

[ilprincipe]

Wait a minute! where is this 3. picture from? it is not in TII as i remember, so it could be edited.


and all Michael btw

you are all confusing me...
I already agreed that no. 3 is NOT MJ..
I think this person needs a name. I will call him "froggy" because of this special eyes...
no. 3 is the same double like in the Smooth Criminal scene of TII....
same eyes....
but what's the conclusion...
there may be a lot of doubles...what does this mean for the hoax?