0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: "misha86"Quote from: "Raven". It is not about a different looking cleft or nose or whatever at some picture, it is the overall image..so are you saying that as long as the person has the "overall" image then its mike?? as long as they have a cleft, reguardless of size, light skin, and a curly wig its mike???No, many more things. You're not making sense. What are you saying here, that it would be OK to base an identification on just one thing like nose or ear or cleft but not on the overall picture?
Quote from: "Raven". It is not about a different looking cleft or nose or whatever at some picture, it is the overall image..so are you saying that as long as the person has the "overall" image then its mike?? as long as they have a cleft, reguardless of size, light skin, and a curly wig its mike???
. It is not about a different looking cleft or nose or whatever at some picture, it is the overall image..
This is totally unrespectful, if MJ would see this...people claiming he was "not him" in TII.There is no double who looks like MJ, all of them like wax figures...nothing like mj
Quote from: "KeepTheFaith"This is totally unrespectful, if MJ would see this...people claiming he was "not him" in TII.There is no double who looks like MJ, all of them like wax figures...nothing like mjthis is totally unrespectfull, if MJ would see this...people claiming the double is MJ.
This thread is riduclous. For some reasons the mods doesn't debunk this shit. All the photos I've seen on page 1 is Michael. You're denying the fact.
Quote from: "*Mo*"Quote from: "iMJacksonfaN"Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "iMJacksonfaN"Quote from: "*Mo*"Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "kingofmystery"Quote from: "GoOoF" Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.I am not saying the Ebony photos weren't airbrushed; however, makeup WAS definitely a factor in why the Ebony photoshoot pics of Mike look a bit different. The photographer, Matthew Rolston, talks about the photoshoot, as well as the makeup used, on p. 243 in the Michael Jackson Opus. He said he wanted to use a neutral lip color and warm-toned face powder to create a "golden glow" in the photos which he thought were more complimentary to Michael than the makeup he was wearing at the time. (He is the same photographer who took Mike's photo for the 1983 Human Nature single cover and publicity picture, the one where he's wearing the yellow vest.) Makeup does make a huge difference.I thought this was interesting and thought I'd share.But he is still look like Michael Jackson because he IS Mike do ya know what i mean? U can change your make up u can use photoshop it doesn't matter cause your face 's gonna be still YOUR face. (and it's gonna look like your face. ) EXACTLY.Surgeries is a serious thing.So r u saying he had surgeries on ALL OVER his face in the last three months to make a totally different look? ( and height? and moves? even teeth? )I am saying, no doubles used in the performances. Why would he use doubles to rehearse? To "prove" he was in a good health? If there were doubles, it was definitely a planned movie. No doubles, only Michael. But a planned movie was it for sure.Who says these were rehearsals? It could have been a planned movie all along for all we know.Really, come on...maybe we are all attached to the Borg hive and just THINK we are chatting on a forum.
Quote from: "iMJacksonfaN"Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "iMJacksonfaN"Quote from: "*Mo*"Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "kingofmystery"Quote from: "GoOoF" Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.I am not saying the Ebony photos weren't airbrushed; however, makeup WAS definitely a factor in why the Ebony photoshoot pics of Mike look a bit different. The photographer, Matthew Rolston, talks about the photoshoot, as well as the makeup used, on p. 243 in the Michael Jackson Opus. He said he wanted to use a neutral lip color and warm-toned face powder to create a "golden glow" in the photos which he thought were more complimentary to Michael than the makeup he was wearing at the time. (He is the same photographer who took Mike's photo for the 1983 Human Nature single cover and publicity picture, the one where he's wearing the yellow vest.) Makeup does make a huge difference.I thought this was interesting and thought I'd share.But he is still look like Michael Jackson because he IS Mike do ya know what i mean? U can change your make up u can use photoshop it doesn't matter cause your face 's gonna be still YOUR face. (and it's gonna look like your face. ) EXACTLY.Surgeries is a serious thing.So r u saying he had surgeries on ALL OVER his face in the last three months to make a totally different look? ( and height? and moves? even teeth? )I am saying, no doubles used in the performances. Why would he use doubles to rehearse? To "prove" he was in a good health? If there were doubles, it was definitely a planned movie. No doubles, only Michael. But a planned movie was it for sure.Who says these were rehearsals? It could have been a planned movie all along for all we know.
Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "iMJacksonfaN"Quote from: "*Mo*"Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "kingofmystery"Quote from: "GoOoF" Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.I am not saying the Ebony photos weren't airbrushed; however, makeup WAS definitely a factor in why the Ebony photoshoot pics of Mike look a bit different. The photographer, Matthew Rolston, talks about the photoshoot, as well as the makeup used, on p. 243 in the Michael Jackson Opus. He said he wanted to use a neutral lip color and warm-toned face powder to create a "golden glow" in the photos which he thought were more complimentary to Michael than the makeup he was wearing at the time. (He is the same photographer who took Mike's photo for the 1983 Human Nature single cover and publicity picture, the one where he's wearing the yellow vest.) Makeup does make a huge difference.I thought this was interesting and thought I'd share.But he is still look like Michael Jackson because he IS Mike do ya know what i mean? U can change your make up u can use photoshop it doesn't matter cause your face 's gonna be still YOUR face. (and it's gonna look like your face. ) EXACTLY.Surgeries is a serious thing.So r u saying he had surgeries on ALL OVER his face in the last three months to make a totally different look? ( and height? and moves? even teeth? )I am saying, no doubles used in the performances. Why would he use doubles to rehearse? To "prove" he was in a good health? If there were doubles, it was definitely a planned movie. No doubles, only Michael. But a planned movie was it for sure.
Quote from: "iMJacksonfaN"Quote from: "*Mo*"Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "kingofmystery"Quote from: "GoOoF" Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.I am not saying the Ebony photos weren't airbrushed; however, makeup WAS definitely a factor in why the Ebony photoshoot pics of Mike look a bit different. The photographer, Matthew Rolston, talks about the photoshoot, as well as the makeup used, on p. 243 in the Michael Jackson Opus. He said he wanted to use a neutral lip color and warm-toned face powder to create a "golden glow" in the photos which he thought were more complimentary to Michael than the makeup he was wearing at the time. (He is the same photographer who took Mike's photo for the 1983 Human Nature single cover and publicity picture, the one where he's wearing the yellow vest.) Makeup does make a huge difference.I thought this was interesting and thought I'd share.But he is still look like Michael Jackson because he IS Mike do ya know what i mean? U can change your make up u can use photoshop it doesn't matter cause your face 's gonna be still YOUR face. (and it's gonna look like your face. ) EXACTLY.Surgeries is a serious thing.So r u saying he had surgeries on ALL OVER his face in the last three months to make a totally different look? ( and height? and moves? even teeth? )
Quote from: "*Mo*"Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "kingofmystery"Quote from: "GoOoF" Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.I am not saying the Ebony photos weren't airbrushed; however, makeup WAS definitely a factor in why the Ebony photoshoot pics of Mike look a bit different. The photographer, Matthew Rolston, talks about the photoshoot, as well as the makeup used, on p. 243 in the Michael Jackson Opus. He said he wanted to use a neutral lip color and warm-toned face powder to create a "golden glow" in the photos which he thought were more complimentary to Michael than the makeup he was wearing at the time. (He is the same photographer who took Mike's photo for the 1983 Human Nature single cover and publicity picture, the one where he's wearing the yellow vest.) Makeup does make a huge difference.I thought this was interesting and thought I'd share.But he is still look like Michael Jackson because he IS Mike do ya know what i mean? U can change your make up u can use photoshop it doesn't matter cause your face 's gonna be still YOUR face. (and it's gonna look like your face. ) EXACTLY.Surgeries is a serious thing.
Quote from: "GoOoF"Quote from: "kingofmystery"Quote from: "GoOoF" Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.I am not saying the Ebony photos weren't airbrushed; however, makeup WAS definitely a factor in why the Ebony photoshoot pics of Mike look a bit different. The photographer, Matthew Rolston, talks about the photoshoot, as well as the makeup used, on p. 243 in the Michael Jackson Opus. He said he wanted to use a neutral lip color and warm-toned face powder to create a "golden glow" in the photos which he thought were more complimentary to Michael than the makeup he was wearing at the time. (He is the same photographer who took Mike's photo for the 1983 Human Nature single cover and publicity picture, the one where he's wearing the yellow vest.) Makeup does make a huge difference.I thought this was interesting and thought I'd share.But he is still look like Michael Jackson because he IS Mike do ya know what i mean? U can change your make up u can use photoshop it doesn't matter cause your face 's gonna be still YOUR face. (and it's gonna look like your face. ) EXACTLY.
Quote from: "kingofmystery"Quote from: "GoOoF" Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.I am not saying the Ebony photos weren't airbrushed; however, makeup WAS definitely a factor in why the Ebony photoshoot pics of Mike look a bit different. The photographer, Matthew Rolston, talks about the photoshoot, as well as the makeup used, on p. 243 in the Michael Jackson Opus. He said he wanted to use a neutral lip color and warm-toned face powder to create a "golden glow" in the photos which he thought were more complimentary to Michael than the makeup he was wearing at the time. (He is the same photographer who took Mike's photo for the 1983 Human Nature single cover and publicity picture, the one where he's wearing the yellow vest.) Makeup does make a huge difference.I thought this was interesting and thought I'd share.But he is still look like Michael Jackson because he IS Mike do ya know what i mean? U can change your make up u can use photoshop it doesn't matter cause your face 's gonna be still YOUR face. (and it's gonna look like your face. )
Quote from: "GoOoF" Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.I am not saying the Ebony photos weren't airbrushed; however, makeup WAS definitely a factor in why the Ebony photoshoot pics of Mike look a bit different. The photographer, Matthew Rolston, talks about the photoshoot, as well as the makeup used, on p. 243 in the Michael Jackson Opus. He said he wanted to use a neutral lip color and warm-toned face powder to create a "golden glow" in the photos which he thought were more complimentary to Michael than the makeup he was wearing at the time. (He is the same photographer who took Mike's photo for the 1983 Human Nature single cover and publicity picture, the one where he's wearing the yellow vest.) Makeup does make a huge difference.I thought this was interesting and thought I'd share.
Thats not the make-up that's the PhotoShop...But still that's obviously Mike's face.
Sorry but that is NOT a lookalike its him .
Quote from: "brendanjacskon"Sorry but that is NOT a lookalike its him .I know its him.. but that picture is more resent than we think!
Started by *Mo* « 1 2 ... 7 8 » Dave Dave
Started by TruthBeTold « 1 2 ... 36 37 » Other Odd Things
Started by looking4truth « 1 2 ... 1088 1089 » Back/Front discussions
Started by mykidsmum « 1 2 ... 35 36 » The Coroner and Autopsy Report
Started by *Mo* Pictures & Videos of Michael
