This is going to be a longer post – I would like to share my observations from watching the youtube videos. It will not be boring, so go through it with a smile.
IMHO the videos have been published to draw our attention to some important aspects we did not look into so far.
The judge is speaking AND explaining all the time more or less in a kind of monologue which is (as to my knowledge) only a used technique in court when reading and explaining a sentence and the reasons for it - but not before. The judge listens to the others before in order to form his opinion and judgement.
So in this play, the judge IMO is the messenger or brickman and all other decorations around him are giving some ambience like in a theater where a scene will not only live from the actors but from the stage elements like a chair and a table.
We know already what Doc Murray said so far had more to do with Michael than with Doc Murray. So read between the lines of what the judge said. Think twice about the sentences.
There are three aspects about the coloration / decoloration of the skin that jumped into my eyes: (what I call the "The Miracle of the PALING FACES" )1)
“It does not matter if you’re black or white”2)
When do we find the remarkable disappearances after building up what looks like splotches of age as you would find at elderly people (focus on time again)
3)
What happens when the coloration goes away (as it builds up slowly but disappears quickly – just like Michael – I did focus on the disappearance rather than the appearance).
I am not fully done with the analyses of the three videos – if you notice different things I ran over or misinterpreted, please add, correct, fill them in. If I did not understand the words right – the sound sometimes was a catastrophy and English is not my first language. Be patient with me pls, correct me where needed, I’ll be happy about your findings.
Details on aspect #1 (skin color black or white):This is a very obvious association with the fact that there are African Americans who will be treated differently than Caucasian Americans – in the public eye, in court, in daily life. No matter how many “equal rights” there are.
Details on aspect #2 (time, when does the coloration go away):The photoshopped skin coloration goes away just before:
in JackylovesMJJ’s youtube video part 1[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/user/JackylovesMJJ#p/u/9/64fvgO_vmjA[/YouTube]
On the judge’s face
(0:50)
“Now I’ve been told by the parties that the date that you all wish is for the next freedom setting day would be April 5. Is that acceptable for defence [defence or “the fans”]?”
On CM’s face
(2:02) “
… court days” [court = short in French - short days = soon? Maybe we should review the full sentence I had difficulties to grasp]
On the judge’s face
(3:38)
“Go ahead – I’d be happy to listening to what you have to say.”
in JackylovesMJJ’s youtube video part 2[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/user/JackylovesMJJ#p/u/8/5JQB7-Bv-C0[/YouTube]
On EC’s face
(0:25)
“then anybody who had financial problems then would have a higher bail“ [remark: bails do have different meanings in law terms – it could also be a financial security for a loan of a third party]
(2:27)
“and I try to do that in each of the cases I do set up bails.”(3:13)
“Now obviously if a case turns on the unique fabs, I have to look at the nature of the charges, I have to look at criminal record, …”(4:26)
"You know, people can’t disappear of the face of the earth in a global technology likeness. People can be found at some point."(4:50)
"I mean, people have family outside of the United States, it’s not unreasonable to visit them so I don’t know that that’s a specific factor"
[Intermezzo:]
[judge still pale] (5:00) “not paying child support; I guess [the blonde lady comes in left to right passing behind the judge], in a sense you can’t believe [the blonde lady walks out right to left passing again behind the judge] that’s you know violating the court order”(5:15)
“In other words, you know, I don’t know, you know, somebody has the ability to pay and if they are unable to pay because of that, it’s not that you’re not willing at, that’s a factor”(5:30)
“in the sense of what the government is suggesting: hey, he’s told us he’s coming back, he’s not gonna come back.”(5:41)
“the nature of the defense in this case which is very significant and also that he has a primary residence out of the State of California”(6:02)
“I think that’s a reasonable given all of the factors and it’s three times the bail schedule and it’s not as much as the government requested.”in JackylovesMJJ’s youtube video part 3[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/user/JackylovesMJJ#p/u/7/dnjqa4c0oH4[/YouTube]
(0:50)
“(the department of justice) is actually hold this and gonna put your name on a list so that you can’t apply for another passport cause they’re gonna freeze it so that’ll be turned over to the government for that purpose”(1:13)
“I don’t see any reason to contrail his travel if it was outside the United States”(1:38)
“You understand that, Dr. Murray?”(2:27)
“You may not under any circumstances use any anaesthetic agent such as specifically Propofol."(2:51)
“not a physician but they’re on the same class of those types of drugs”
[Famous intermezzo:]
[3:31: “I don’t want YOU sedating people.” ]On CM’s face:
(3:40)
“They’re gonna be doing that, that’s fine, but I’m worried about the sedation aspect of this.”On judge’s face
(4:50)
“Other people are gonna be responsible for the sedation of the patient – not Dr. Murray.”Now I do not know who this person is who setting up a Youtube Channel on Feb 4, 2010 and is having all those rare footages to offer – backstage WATW recording, rare interviews etc.
I recommend to watch her videos. Vividly I recommend to watch this particular one:
[YouTube]http://www.youtube.com/user/JackylovesMJJ#p/u/0/HcbldWdWP6Y[/YouTube]
It talks about the CM voicemail
(I wonder who leaked that one) and an
“overseas sabbatical” which is usually an unpaid vacation period one would take for a special personal project or for staying with a newborn child. So we are talking about a temporary absence for important reason.
Now this together with the somewhat pointed out utterances of spokesman Mr. Schwartz (a German last name meaning “black”), I have more questionmarks than answers but yes, I never excluded additional family somewhere on the globe. It is all for L.O.V.E. hmmm.
I did not forget about the
Details on aspect #3 (what happens when coloration disappears):This is getting somewhat creepy now. :shock: :mrgreen: :lol:
Look at the screenshots I took from the youtube videos and tell me what you see.
Do you see Michael’s eyes on the forehead of the judge?
[attachment=3:ra6ivijl]Judge_part2_face.jpg[/attachment:ra6ivijl]
[attachment=2:ra6ivijl]judge_part3_1-13_face_greenshot_2010-02-18_19-10-49.jpg[/attachment:ra6ivijl]
[attachment=1:ra6ivijl]judge_part3_2-22_face_greenshot_2010-02-18_19-10-49.jpg[/attachment:ra6ivijl]
[attachment=0:ra6ivijl]judge_part3_2-48_face_greenshot_2010-02-18_19-10-49.jpg[/attachment:ra6ivijl]
Now you could say, JackylovesMJJ is just another fan and maybe she has many MJ videos on her desktop and somehow it happened that in her video software some images of the MJ fan videos would have been incorporated in a separate layer into the TMZ video.
This is my opinion:
NO WAY this is just a fan’s coincidental spontaneous video overlay, just by accident.
Not on the background of above cited text of the play.
Not on the background of the technique used to project MJ’s eyes on the judge’s forehead.
These MJ eyes and faces are not flat 2-dimensional. They are 3-dimensional surrounding the face of the judge and adapting to the dimensions and angles of the forehead.
Now what do we make out of this?
Either JackylovesMJJ is a fan having no idea of what she was handed to publish on youtube.
Or JackylovesMJJ is another brickman.
In any case, the production and publication of these 3 videos on youtube is not triggered by any accident.
Looks like Michael is watching this, doesn't it? :mrgreen:
Does he want one more time point out that it is
ALL FAKE?
I haven't found a window to look into Michael's thoughts, yet.
But he
IS without any doubt a master sans pareil.
