While I DO think that posting someone's autopsy results is an invasion of privacy, I think that in this case it's all for a specific purpose.
I believe the autopsy is 110% truthful **AND** that it is all information of Michael Jackson.
However, I am not 100% sure if the information was obtained/given after his death -or- if it was given while he was alive to make it seem that he is really dead to people who knew him more intimately.
If the autopsy was based on information taken after his death, then the family may not have a problem with it being released because they want it to PROVE that he was murdered.
If the autopsy was based on information taken while he was alive, then the family may not have a problem with it being released because they want it to PROVE that he is "dead".
I'm still trying to figure that part out.