Official back & Front thread

Started by looking4truth, February 08, 2010, 08:08:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
The first post content
BACK is a member of the MJJC message board which is one of the largest Michael Jackson fan club message boards.  In 2005 and 2006, he posted some interesting posts that refer to this adventure we are on right now. I just want to pick out some of the posts that stand out. However, you can check out all of them HERE: http://mjkit.forumotion.net/michael-s-f ... light=back.  A HUGE thanks goes to Pammy for taking the time to posting all of these. Please look at the dates and times of these posts.

One of his most popular posts was of the New 7 Day Theory, which was posted by BACK on June 25, 2006 in response to a thread about 2Pac and his seven day theory. The comparison between 2Pac and Michael was recently mentioned on TMZ (http://www.tmz.com/2010/01/03/michael-j ... other-day/). These posts may be hard to comprehend at first. However, it is one of the most convincing pieces I've read from an "informer". Please look at the date and time and also note the mention of Mystery777, another member on that same board that folks thought to be MJ. Here is a post from that member: http://img253.imageshack.us/img253/2905/mystery777.jpg.

Here is the theory: http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/1197/52582006.jpg
Here is another screenshot that's in reference to his 7 Day theory: http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/664/625820062.jpg

After June 25th, BACK posted a conclusion of sorts about his theory, which makes references to Jesus, Archangel Michael, Evan Chandler and also this being 20 years in the making: http://mjkit.forumotion.net/video-s-hoa ... 937-25.htm (screenshots are towards the middle of the page. If you wish to just read the text only, you can go to the first page of the thread)

The conclusion may make some people a little uncomfortable and indifference towards BACK but please continue to read. You may disagree with him on some things but other things cannot be denied. For instance, this post about This is It: http://img394.imageshack.us/img394/1723/1382007thisi.png  and this post about one day of simmering: http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/7841/10t ... 252610.jpg. Haven't we heard MJ say the word "simmering" quite a bit in the movie, This is it? I have also written a post about how the TII post could be connected with the three sevens MJ wore in the movie HERE: viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3635.

Are these posts just mere coincidences?  It's up to you but I think we all know how we feel about coincidences.

Here are a few other interesting posts from BACK:
Not a comeback but a TAKEOVER: http://img160.imageshack.us/img160/1641 ... ver161.jpg
Check your future history books: http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/6225/2462007.jpg
The King is BACK: http://img98.imageshack.us/img98/3492/kingisback.jpg
Media Failed: http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/8514/mediafailed.jpg (Even mentions Harvey Levin, that lawyer that runs TMZ...hmmm...)

Some members believed/believe that he is MJ himself. I am not too sure of that but I do believe that he is "in the know".

And do you notice a certain catch phrase in his posts? Keep Watchin? Listen closely @ 00:18 of the official preview of TII: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDXND33oDQ0 (Thanks to members at the old board for finding that). And remember what TMZ folks said to some of us hoax believers when confronted about the R.I.P. list? Keep watching! (viewtopic.php?f=48&t=4896)

So sometimes my dear believers that are losing faith after today, we have to look BACK to move FORWARD. :)

 Popular topic   Link

Sarahli

September 14, 2010, 06:04:02 AM #255 Last Edit: September 20, 2011, 01:58:57 AM by ForstAMoon
Quote from: Bethechange

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showt ... ost2856940

Posted yesterday (June 22)

Re: Katherine video statement thanks VoicePlate and Fans for Michael Jackson Tribute

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I presume you have a Mother and Grandmother(s) somewhere in your lineage, or else you wouldn't exist. Bearing this in mind, why don't you think about them the next time you chose to demonstrate your ice-cold nature & approach towards Katherine Jackson.
Way to go! Well said! I love it!

This issue is very much beyond a message board and recycling of responses...It's personal. I mean, really! There are various family members who frequent this board and that should come as a suprise to noone. So imagine the affect these constant, unchecked, verbal assaults are having on those who have reason to care for her. This very beautiful person should NEVER be subjected to such foolishness. Back's big love and respect for Katherine...

NEVER--EVER-EVER-EVER-EVER----Dammit---EVER.    (sorry back if you see this I presume it wasn't meant to make people laugh but admit it now it's funny!) Especially on a forum that ONCE stood on principle and supported Michael by also RESPECTING the ones he LOVED the most. Mr. Taylor, you should aknowledge that Michael would never have associated himself with any forum demeaning his mother. AT ALL..PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! Didn't back said in another post that he would leave the place if this continued?...

Quite frankly, I could give 2 _ _ _ _ _ about an opinion regarding different ventures and issues of money. Relegate that opinion to a gas can and set a match to it! Perhaps Levin will "report" it.
Give 2 what? Must we fill in the blank? Maybe it's just an expression...

I've continiously warned that this repeated lambasting of Katherine will end in regret. 24/7 Pressure, do you know what it feels like? After losing a Son nearly a year ago, you're reminded of just how fragile any element of life can be. Then you find yourself facing the fact that your youngest Son just had a medical scare. Do you know what that feels like? That being compounded pressure. Do you?
Ok so back is warning people to stop or this will end in regret. I mean this is big why does he say that? Who is back? How can he make it end in regret?

Imagine anyone questioning the character, sincerity, competence and motivation of YOUR Mother. What would you do?
So true!!! I would be outraged for sure! And I would tell it to people face to face for once and for all as pleading in a forum is not enough...

Unfortunately, for me, I think resolution to this issue will only happen face-to-face.
Unfortunately? Face to face?

Pleading has only fanned the flames!

Keep WATCHIN'.......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm..."face-to-face" resolution. Very interesting.
BeTheChange

Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:38 am

With L.O.V.E
Interesting indeed, face-to face resolution to this issue hmmm, back is going to show up publicly and say what he thinks? Also back's reaction towards critics made against Katherine shows that he has a very deep love and big big big, big respect for her, this is obvious he just cannot stand the bad comments and judgements and he is totally right, the thing is that he's the only one I saw commenting with such force...I noted that he also wrote "Mother Katherine" this is a not really the way a simple fan would have wrote it in my opinion...(of course I may be reading way too much into this).
We are here for you Michael and will always love you whatever happens.
'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
"You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them."

GINAFELICIA

September 14, 2010, 07:45:21 AM #256 Last Edit: September 20, 2011, 02:00:16 AM by ForstAMoon
Quote from: Sarahli

Quote from: Bethechange

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showt ... ost2856940

Posted yesterday (June 22)

Re: Katherine video statement thanks VoicePlate and Fans for Michael Jackson Tribute

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I presume you have a Mother and Grandmother(s) somewhere in your lineage, or else you wouldn't exist. Bearing this in mind, why don't you think about them the next time you chose to demonstrate your ice-cold nature & approach towards Katherine Jackson.
Way to go! Well said! I love it!  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

This issue is very much beyond a message board and recycling of responses...It's personal. I mean, really! There are various family members who frequent this board and that should come as a suprise to noone. So imagine the affect these constant, unchecked, verbal assaults are having on those who have reason to care for her. This very beautiful person should NEVER be subjected to such foolishness. Back's big love and respect for Katherine...

NEVER--EVER-EVER-EVER-EVER----Dammit---EVER.   :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:   (sorry back if you see this I presume it wasn't meant to make people laugh but admit it now it's funny!) Especially on a forum that ONCE stood on principle and supported Michael by also RESPECTING the ones he LOVED the most. Mr. Taylor, you should aknowledge that Michael would never have associated himself with any forum demeaning his mother. AT ALL..PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! Didn't back said in another post that he would leave the place if this continued?...

Quite frankly, I could give 2 _ _ _ _ _ about an opinion regarding different ventures and issues of money. Relegate that opinion to a gas can and set a match to it! Perhaps Levin will "report" it.
Give 2 what? Must we fill in the blank? Maybe it's just an expression...

I've continiously warned that this repeated lambasting of Katherine will end in regret. 24/7 Pressure, do you know what it feels like? After losing a Son nearly a year ago, you're reminded of just how fragile any element of life can be. Then you find yourself facing the fact that your youngest Son just had a medical scare. Do you know what that feels like? That being compounded pressure. Do you?
Ok so back is warning people to stop or this will end in regret. I mean this is big why does he say that? Who is back? How can he make it end in regret?

Imagine anyone questioning the character, sincerity, competence and motivation of YOUR Mother. What would you do?
So true!!! I would be outraged for sure! And I would tell it to people face to face for once and for all as pleading in a forum is not enough... 8-)
Unfortunately, for me, I think resolution to this issue will only happen face-to-face.
Unfortunately? Face to face?    8-)

Pleading has only fanned the flames!

Keep WATCHIN'.......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm..."face-to-face" resolution. Very interesting.
BeTheChange

Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:38 am

With L.O.V.E
Interesting indeed, face-to face resolution to this issue hmmm, back is going to show up publicly and say what he thinks? Also back's reaction towards critics made against Katherine shows that he has a very deep love and big big big, big respect for her, this is obvious he just cannot stand the bad comments and judgements and he is totally right, the thing is that he's the only one I saw commenting with such force...I noted that he also wrote "Mother Katherine" this is a not really the way a simple fan would have wrote it in my opinion...(of course I may be reading way too much into this).
very good observations. Back is way too involved in defending Katherine.

suspicious mind

September 14, 2010, 08:33:45 AM #257 Last Edit: September 20, 2011, 02:01:58 AM by ForstAMoon
Quote from: GINAFELICIA

Quote from: Sarahli

Quote from: Bethechange

http://www.mjjcommunity.com/forum/showt ... ost2856940

Posted yesterday (June 22)

Re: Katherine video statement thanks VoicePlate and Fans for Michael Jackson Tribute

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I presume you have a Mother and Grandmother(s) somewhere in your lineage, or else you wouldn't exist. Bearing this in mind, why don't you think about them the next time you chose to demonstrate your ice-cold nature & approach towards Katherine Jackson.
Way to go! Well said! I love it!  :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

This issue is very much beyond a message board and recycling of responses...It's personal. I mean, really! There are various family members who frequent this board and that should come as a suprise to noone. So imagine the affect these constant, unchecked, verbal assaults are having on those who have reason to care for her. This very beautiful person should NEVER be subjected to such foolishness. Back's big love and respect for Katherine...

NEVER--EVER-EVER-EVER-EVER----Dammit---EVER.   :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:   (sorry back if you see this I presume it wasn't meant to make people laugh but admit it now it's funny!) Especially on a forum that ONCE stood on principle and supported Michael by also RESPECTING the ones he LOVED the most. Mr. Taylor, you should aknowledge that Michael would never have associated himself with any forum demeaning his mother. AT ALL..PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!! Didn't back said in another post that he would leave the place if this continued?...

Quite frankly, I could give 2 _ _ _ _ _ about an opinion regarding different ventures and issues of money. Relegate that opinion to a gas can and set a match to it! Perhaps Levin will "report" it.
Give 2 what? Must we fill in the blank? Maybe it's just an expression...

I've continiously warned that this repeated lambasting of Katherine will end in regret. 24/7 Pressure, do you know what it feels like? After losing a Son nearly a year ago, you're reminded of just how fragile any element of life can be. Then you find yourself facing the fact that your youngest Son just had a medical scare. Do you know what that feels like? That being compounded pressure. Do you?
Ok so back is warning people to stop or this will end in regret. I mean this is big why does he say that? Who is back? How can he make it end in regret?

Imagine anyone questioning the character, sincerity, competence and motivation of YOUR Mother. What would you do?
So true!!! I would be outraged for sure! And I would tell it to people face to face for once and for all as pleading in a forum is not enough... 8-)

Unfortunately, for me, I think resolution to this issue will only happen face-to-face.
Unfortunately? Face to face?    8-)

Pleading has only fanned the flames!

Keep WATCHIN'.......

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmmm..."face-to-face" resolution. Very interesting.
BeTheChange

Posts: 35
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 4:38 am

With L.O.V.E
Interesting indeed, face-to face resolution to this issue hmmm, back is going to show up publicly and say what he thinks? Also back's reaction towards critics made against Katherine shows that he has a very deep love and big big big, big respect for her, this is obvious he just cannot stand the bad comments and judgements and he is totally right, the thing is that he's the only one I saw commenting with such force...I noted that he also wrote "Mother Katherine" this is a not really the way a simple fan would have wrote it in my opinion...(of course I may be reading way too much into this).
very good observations. Back is way too involved in defending Katherine.

so what might it mean.  i admit i have not read alot of this . are people speaking against katherine over money or joes treatment of the children?

"I am sending you out like sheep among wolves. Therefore be shrewd as serpents and as innocent as doves."  




Why not just tell people I'm an alien from Mars? Tell them I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight. They'll believe anything you say, because you're a reporter. But if I, Michael Jackson, were to say, "I'm an alien from Mars and I eat live chickens and do a voodoo dance at midnight," people would say, "Oh, man, that Michael Jackson is nuts. He's cracked up. You can't believe a single word that comes out of his mouth."

paula-c

September 14, 2010, 09:29:21 AM #258 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

That's hardly the response of fans, well I think I could be someone from the family or Michael himself.
Another thing, there are fans that are going the limit, have no right to be insulting to any family member. when bigotry becomes dangerous this invades the mind and the criterion is caught by stupidity, they are convinced to have the absolute reason, and is willing to enforce it by all means (the insults start here), do not respect people or ideas of others.


foreverking

September 14, 2010, 11:02:08 AM #259 Last Edit: September 20, 2011, 03:33:49 AM by ForstAMoon
Quote from: FrenchBraid

Quote from: anewfan

I think he put those numbers by the date to help us see how he came up with them.....not sure how or what we are suppose to decipher using that method. And once we decipher them.....what are we suppose to do with that info? ( I understand how he got those numbers using the date....I just don't know what to do with that method now......) Does this make sense?

Anyone have any thoughts/suggestions as to what we can figure out?

YES! How about this?

Thursday, 25 June 2009 DIED
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 MEMORIAL
It is 12 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Thursday, 25 June 2009 DIED
Thursday, 3 September 2009 FUNERAL
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 8 February 2010 MURRAY ARRAIGNED
Monday, 5 April 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #1
It is 56 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 5 April 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #1
Monday, 14 June 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #2
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 14 June 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #2
Monday, 23 August 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #3
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 23 August 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #3
Tuesday, 26 October 2010 JUDGE/ATTORNEYS MEET
It is 64 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Tuesday, 26 October 2010 JUDGE/ATTORNEYS MEET
Tuesday, 4 January 2011 MURRAY COURT DATE #4 (PRELIMINARY HEARING)
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date

<!-- m -->http://www.timeanddate.com/date/duration.html<!-- m -->

I've been watching these dates for a long time, looking for answers to BACK's mysterious numbers. When the 4th lot of 70 days appeared, well, one simply has to question if this is planned or if it's divine intervention. What are the odds of all these 70 day time periods? Off the charts? How many coincidences can there be since all this began?

Maybe Foreverking can give us a heads up on how these dates are set as she has worked in the LA DA's office as an attorney.

@ Foreverking... a US attorney friend from the East Coast who works in criminal justice told me that it's unheard of for someone to be arrested and arraigned on the same day - do you know if this is the case in California?

It can happen, if the attorneys have a pre arranged deal to have the high profile client turn themsleves in and be arraigned on the same day due to security reasons.


bec

September 14, 2010, 11:13:22 AM #260 Last Edit: September 20, 2011, 02:03:58 AM by ForstAMoon
Quote from: FrenchBraid

Quote from: anewfan

I think he put those numbers by the date to help us see how he came up with them.....not sure how or what we are suppose to decipher using that method. And once we decipher them.....what are we suppose to do with that info? ( I understand how he got those numbers using the date....I just don't know what to do with that method now......) Does this make sense?

Anyone have any thoughts/suggestions as to what we can figure out?

YES! How about this?

Thursday, 25 June 2009 DIED
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 MEMORIAL
It is 12 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Thursday, 25 June 2009 DIED
Thursday, 3 September 2009 FUNERAL
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 8 February 2010 MURRAY ARRAIGNED
Monday, 5 April 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #1
It is 56 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 5 April 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #1
Monday, 14 June 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #2
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 14 June 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #2
Monday, 23 August 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #3
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 23 August 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #3
Tuesday, 26 October 2010 JUDGE/ATTORNEYS MEET
It is 64 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Tuesday, 26 October 2010 JUDGE/ATTORNEYS MEET
Tuesday, 4 January 2011 MURRAY COURT DATE #4 (PRELIMINARY HEARING)
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date

http://www.timeanddate.com/date/duration.html

I've been watching these dates for a long time, looking for answers to BACK's mysterious numbers. When the 4th lot of 70 days appeared, well, one simply has to question if this is planned or if it's divine intervention. What are the odds of all these 70 day time periods? Off the charts? How many coincidences can there be since all this began?

Maybe Foreverking can give us a heads up on how these dates are set as she has worked in the LA DA's office as an attorney.

@ Foreverking... a US attorney friend from the East Coast who works in criminal justice told me that it's unheard of for someone to be arrested and arraigned on the same day - do you know if this is the case in California?

I found several more 70 day period frenchbraid, seems there is a cycle here, we are in the middle of the 7th 70 day period right now, please read this: viewtopic.php?p=232820#p232820
Are you entertained?

Infinitylady

September 14, 2010, 11:54:10 AM #261 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

gotta c heck this out later.


2 Bad

September 14, 2010, 12:45:50 PM #262 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I'm impressed Bec!
Now you have me thinking about the important dates from 2005.
Was Michael declared not guilty on all counts on Aug 18th,2005?
It's a start, looking back.

I have to be gone all day daggonit!
I'll check to see if there are any posts later.


~Souza~

September 14, 2010, 01:19:33 PM #263 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "2 Bad"

I'm impressed Bec!
Now you have me thinking about the important dates from 2005.
Was Michael declared not guilty on all counts on Aug 18th,2005?
It's a start, looking back.

I have to be gone all day daggonit!
I'll check to see if there are any posts later.

No, that was june 13, 2005.

Im_convincedmjalive

September 14, 2010, 01:20:40 PM #264 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "2 Bad"

I'm impressed Bec!
Now you have me thinking about the important dates from 2005.
Was Michael declared not guilty on all counts on Aug 18th,2005?
It's a start, looking back.

I have to be gone all day daggonit!
I'll check to see if there are any posts later.

OUCH!

http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2005/aug/1 ... g_hearing/

Michael Jackson fined for missing hearing
Order to appear in New Orleans arrived on day of acquittal in molestation case
By Mary Foster - Associated Press Writer

August 18, 2005

New Orleans — An irate judge, miffed by Michael Jackson's failure to have his lawyer show up for a hearing in a civil case, fined the singer $10,000 on Wednesday.

Jackson was a no-show and had no lawyer present at a July hearing in the case accusing him of sexually assaulting an 18-year-old man during the 1984 World's Fair. Jackson denies the accusations.

Jackson attorney Charles F. Gay Jr. told U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon on Wednesday that the summons for the court date was simply lost in the confusion of the pop singer's child molestation trial in California.

The summons for the New Orleans court appearance arrived on June 13 - the day that Jackson was acquitted.

"I would like to point out that June 13 was probably the most anxious day of Michael Jackson's life," Gay said. "That was the day the jury reached the verdict."

At that time, Gay told the judge, Jackson was not eating or sleeping and was worried about his and his children's futures.

"The order of June 13 did not get in the proper people's hands because of the chaos in Michael Jackson's life," Gay said.

The judge said that he did not feel it was appropriate to fine Jackson for contempt, but he was not sold on Gay's excuse, either, so he levied other fines related to court costs.

"It strains my understanding of the facts that Mr. Jackson did not know of this matter," Fallon said.

In the federal civil lawsuit, Joseph Thomas Bartucci Jr. claims he was lured into Jackson's limousine by one of the singer's employees in 1984, held against his will for days and sexually assaulted.

Bartucci claims he repressed the memories until 2003, when he saw the coverage of the child molestation charges against Jackson.

Bartucci is seeking unspecified monetary compensation from Jackson on a variety of claims such as emotional distress.

Bartucci's attorney, William A. Pigg, said that he would push for a quick trial.

"My client has been under a great deal of stress," Pigg said. "He has been the victim of character assassination."

Jackson's lawyer doubts the case will ever go to trial.

There is a one-year statue of limitations from the time Bartucci claims he regained his memory, but Gay said that Bartucci allegedly discussed the allegations with his wife during the 1990s

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I found this link to the date of Aug. 18, 2005.

I did not know about this before, terrible what Michael ENDURED.

I was in the hospital for 2 weeks during Michael's trial in Santa Barbara.

I had just been through 3 life saving operations. I was high on Demoral the whole time.
I saw on T.V. occasional info on his trial.

I missed it for the most part. I am just now catching up to it.

I am outraged at the treatment of INJUSTICE that Michael went through.

I am Glad to see PayBACK!  8-)
The troot will PREVAIL!
Peace


TheRunningGirl

September 14, 2010, 01:31:22 PM #265 Last Edit: September 20, 2011, 02:05:35 AM by ForstAMoon
Quote from: bec

Quote from: FrenchBraid

Quote from: anewfan

I think he put those numbers by the date to help us see how he came up with them.....not sure how or what we are suppose to decipher using that method. And once we decipher them.....what are we suppose to do with that info? ( I understand how he got those numbers using the date....I just don't know what to do with that method now......) Does this make sense?

Anyone have any thoughts/suggestions as to what we can figure out?

YES! How about this?

Thursday, 25 June 2009 DIED
Tuesday, 7 July 2009 MEMORIAL
It is 12 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Thursday, 25 June 2009 DIED
Thursday, 3 September 2009 FUNERAL
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 8 February 2010 MURRAY ARRAIGNED
Monday, 5 April 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #1
It is 56 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 5 April 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #1
Monday, 14 June 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #2
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 14 June 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #2
Monday, 23 August 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #3
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Monday, 23 August 2010 MURRAY COURT DATE #3
Tuesday, 26 October 2010 JUDGE/ATTORNEYS MEET
It is 64 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date
________________________________________
Tuesday, 26 October 2010 JUDGE/ATTORNEYS MEET
Tuesday, 4 January 2011 MURRAY COURT DATE #4 (PRELIMINARY HEARING)
It is 70 days from the start date to the end date, but not including the end date

<!-- m -->http://www.timeanddate.com/date/duration.html<!-- m -->

I've been watching these dates for a long time, looking for answers to BACK's mysterious numbers. When the 4th lot of 70 days appeared, well, one simply has to question if this is planned or if it's divine intervention. What are the odds of all these 70 day time periods? Off the charts? How many coincidences can there be since all this began?

Maybe Foreverking can give us a heads up on how these dates are set as she has worked in the LA DA's office as an attorney.

@ Foreverking... a US attorney friend from the East Coast who works in criminal justice told me that it's unheard of for someone to be arrested and arraigned on the same day - do you know if this is the case in California?

I found several more 70 day period frenchbraid, seems there is a cycle here, we are in the middle of the 7th 70 day period right now, please read this: <!-- l -->viewtopic.php?p=232820#p232820<!-- l -->
Yes it seems to be all part of this New Seven Day Theory. The 7+0 minutes referred to in the post below may well be pointing to those 70 days intervals... then the 3+4+0 is possibly another periodicity/pattern in the hoax or even an end date.  Based on the above dates I have checked whether the start and end dates for each of the 70 days intervals had any meanings, here is what I found":

Period1:
From: -- 25(a) - 06(b) - 09 -------> a - b = 25 - 6 = 19
To:-----03(c) - 09(d) - 09 -------> c + d = 3 + 9 = 12 (As d>c)
||(a-b)| - |(c+d)|| = 19 - 12 = 7
Also a-c = 22 = 2+2 =4  and b-d= -3 -------> |(a-c) - (b-d)| = 4 - (-3)= 7

Period2:
From: -- 5(a) - 04(b) - 10 -------> a - b = 5 - 4 = 1
To:-----14(c) - 06(d) - 10 -------> c - d = 14 - 6 = 8 (As d<c)
||(a-b)| - |(c-d)|| = |1 - 8| = 7
Also a-c = - 9   and b-d = - 2 -------> |(a-c) - (b-d)| = |-9-(-2)| = 7

Period3:
From: -- 14(a) - 06(b) - 10 -------> a - b = 14 - 6 = 8
To:-----23(c) - 08(d) - 10 -------> c - d = 23 - 8 = 15 (As d<c)
||(a-b)| - |(c-d)|| = |8 - 15| = 7
Also a-c = - 9   and b-d = - 2 -------> |(a-c) - (b-d)| = |-9-(-2)| = 7

Period4:
From: -- 26(a) - 10(b) - 10 -------> a - b = 26 - 10 = 16
To:-----4(c) - 01(d) - 11 -------> c - (d+12) = 4 - (1+12) = 9 (As d<c) and +12 correction for year change)
||(a-b)| - |(c-d)|| = |16 - 9| = 7
Also a-c = 22 = 2+2 = 4   and b-(d+12)= -3 -------> |(a-c) + (b-d)| = 4 - (- 3) = 7

This implies that the start and end dates for each 70 day period within the hoax are chosen in accordance with the rules of the New Seven Days Theory making each period a 777 period!   :shock:
I am starting to understand why Einstein was a guest at Mike's last supper! Remember the painting!   :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Quote from: Back

In theory, one's mind becomes transfixed on tIME before realizing human energy and curiosity is much better spent focussing on the mOMENT, when it arrives. There is no supplement for the mOMENT, for it is the oNLY thing subliminally earthly that causes time to stand still. There will come a mOMENT, for it is etched in the future books, which will one day become books of history. Time promises this. The underlying crust of the custard pie is not the ingredients used, but it is very much the tIME it takes to "be done". Is it cooking? Does it smell good? Is the temperature set to 3+4+0 degrees and set for 7+0 minutes? Don't take your eyes off the pie as it bakes. It's best to kEEP WATCHIN' .......................................... .................................................. ..................>>>>

With L.O.V.E


"Let us dream of tomorrow where
we can truly love from the soul, and
know love as the ultimate truth at
the heart of all creation."

BeTheChange

September 14, 2010, 01:49:53 PM #266 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "foreverking"

There were 4 numbers in his 7 day theory post. The quote from his post is below. I think the key to the hoax is in those numbers. I know MJ had a thing for 777. He wore it on his clothes a day before he faked his death and its a rumor that it was on the crown placed on his coffin at the burial.  But I think he had a thing for numbers in general. Those 4 numbers mean something or BACK would not have posted them. I've put the quote from his post below. Does anyone have any suggestions?

relapse...back @ Jun 25 2006, 11:54 PM............post Today, 10:06 PM.. 1+6=7
62 ..76...813...21

Those 4 numbers (among others) have haunted me (and kept me up many, many nights) for the past year!!!  I have spent more hours than I would ever admit to  :oops: trying to somehow 'plug' them in to the This Is It dvd (i've also tried it on a blu-ray copy).  I began trying these numbers after TS's redirect and post about Easter Eggs.  I have a gut feeling that This Is It does, in fact, have these hidden clips and it's a matter of 'cracking the code' in order to find them.  But it sure ain't easy...why would MJ make anything in this whole thing easy????  :x   My gut also tells me that between Back and TS's posts, we HAVE been given the codes...it's just a matter of 'connecting the dots' to find them.

Here's a recap of TS's post about the Easter Eggs.  Could someone please scoot over and make room for me in their padded cell?  :oops:   :|

R22. DVD Easter Eggs
{http://www.dvdeastereggs.com/faq.php}

Here again, this clue had more than one meaning. A fairly obvious one is that Easter relates to the resurrection theme of TII, especially the Thriller part. Does this mean that MJ will return next April, during the Easter season? Not necessarily. Then when can we expect the MJ return to public view? That's what everyone wants to know, right?

As he said at the end of the movie: I will come "in my own time"; it is up to him alone, and nobody else will be able to figure it out for sure. Some distinct possibilities include: 12-25-09 (Christmas), 12-31-09 (full moon & New Years Eve), 1-1-10 (New Years Day), 1-18-10 (MLK Day), 1-25-10 (seven months since the "death", and same time as the DVD release), or beyond. Hopefully not beyond; but that may depend, to a certain extent, on whether MJ fans are ready for the return (understand the TIAI message, join the Army of L.O.V.E., etc).

But what about the DVD Easter eggs, where does that fit in? Well, this is a term which refers to video clips on DVD's that are hidden; and it takes a particular key sequence code to unlock each hidden clip. Many DVD Easter eggs are simple enough, that people discover the unlock code by random guessing; but the codes can be made so complex, that it is essentially impossible to discover by chance.

If needed, MJ can use this to hide information about the hoax and purpose for the hoax, until the time is right to reveal it. Then, after millions already have the DVD in their homes, the unlock code could be given publicly; then everyone would have the information at the same time.

With L.O.V.E. always.
The beauty of Michael Jackson is found in his heart and soul...his enormous talent is a bonus and what a bonus it is.

~PLAY the moments...PAUSE the memories...STOP the pain...REWIND the happiness~

Sarahli

September 14, 2010, 02:43:38 PM #267 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I also thought that these numbers could be a code don't worry you're not alone BeTheChange  :lol:

When I read TS' post I understand that the code has to be given, meaning that it's not really possible to figure it out by ourselves. Maybe we just cannot find it on purpose, until the time is right...

We are here for you Michael and will always love you whatever happens.
'Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.'
"You shall not accept any information, unless you verify it for yourself. I have given you the hearing, the eyesight, and the brain, and you are responsible for using them."

ijcsly

September 14, 2010, 04:04:03 PM #268 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

ok, i'm not getting something here: when he makes the post about relapse @ june 25 gives the time posted and then the numbers...
the actual first  post with these numbers is dated june 26 NOT 25 also the times he gives for the posts made don't match up??? Do we have an actual post made by BACK from june 25  2006 with these numbers????

His seven day theory was posted on august 25 2006 and thats where he says relapse @june 25 and the numbers thingy  but its not right...the numbers thingy is dated june 26...

TheRunningGirl

September 14, 2010, 04:24:25 PM #269 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "ijcsly"

ok, i'm not getting something here: when he makes the post about relapse @ june 25 gives the time posted and then the numbers...
the actual first  post with these numbers is dated june 26 NOT 25 also the times he gives for the posts made don't match up??? Do we have an actual post made by BACK from june 25  2006 with these numbers????

His seven day theory was posted on august 25 2006 and thats where he says relapse @june 25 and the numbers thingy  but its not right...the numbers thingy is dated june 26...
It is simply because he appears to be in a different timezone - he is 4 hours behind the MJJC site timezone and refers to time in comparison to his time... I have checked and it works

We have a post from back dated 26/06/2006 at 3:54 am (Back time is 11:54pm on the 25th June 2006 - 4 hours behind) which is the one he is referring to in his post from 25/08/2006 at 2:06am.

So the first post from Back on the New Seven Day Theory was on the 25th June 2006 at 11:54pm and reads

Quote

Keep Watchin'. ............ 62..76...813...21

Trust this makes sense.

With L.O.V.E

Trust this makes sense



"Let us dream of tomorrow where
we can truly love from the soul, and
know love as the ultimate truth at
the heart of all creation."

Similar topics (5)