isnt it interesting how people will accept anything shoved in front of them, as real evidence. we are so used and raised to accepting what we are told without asking, who, what, where, when, why. i hope the jury are asking these questions.
"who" is this in the pic. you say its mj but were is the evidence. where is a hospital wrist band. who took the photo. who can verify that this is really mj.
"what" is that on his face. what are thos pictures on the wall. what room was this taken in, hospital room or morgue.
"where" is this photo taken. where is the proof this photo was taken in a hospital. that wall looks like a wall at my house, your house, the wall at the bank, the wall at ann office (lol, you get my point)
"when" was this taken. years ago or 2 years ago. also is this pre or post mortom. if post, where is that evidence of that.
"why" does it looked photoshopped. why does he appear shorter. why does he have different hair than recently described and seen on TII. why is there tape on his nose. and the list of questions goes on and on.
its amazing that 'evidence' can be shown in court without proof that it is legitimate evidence. NO WONDER there are so many people in prison who are innocent when courts accept and release false evidence.
ALWAYS question evidence! in this day and age it is so easy to doctor emails, photos, voice manipulation, etc etc. mj death case wouldnt be the first in history where false evidence is used in court. if its happened before it will happen again. the evidence of DH as it's validity far outweighs a dodgy photo posted on the net which i am supposed to swallow is mj dead - without having any of the above who what where why when questions answered
