Karen Faye Spouting Off on Facebook... Again.

Started by DancingTheDream, February 01, 2010, 04:49:30 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
The first post content
On facebook today:

I am devastated. No justice anywhere. Michael's children exploited, Michael's family disrespected...

NOT ONLY were they not invited to the Grammy's .....Michael's siblings were NOT invited to participate in WE ARE THE WORLD tonight either

The children were used for ratings and the selling of the DVD.

the children have been thrust into the exact same jungle that devoured Michael.

even the location (Staple Center)....

the same people surround the children that dismissed Michael's mental and physical condition for the sake of their show...

of course the children want to honor and walk in their fathers footsteps (he was killed, remember?) but they are still minors, and not ready to make an educated decision. Their father is no longer here to teach them the dangers, which he knew well. Michael knew enough to keep his children away from the media beasts...if he wanted this for his children, you would have seen his children in the spotlight while he was alive.

the Jackson family begged Katherine not to allow it, but their plea's were disregarded.


What has it got to do with her??  She was MJs make up artist... not a family member, not his wife and not the mother of these children!

  Link

rowdyangel

February 02, 2010, 05:41:53 AM #15 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "mdc"

Quote from: "rowdyangel"

Karen Faye is bitter and twisted.  She needs to start keeping her mouth shut!

If she was as close to Michael as she leads us to believe and she saw how much 'troubles' Michael was having when he was being 'devoured by the jungle he was walking through' then why didn't she speak up at the time??

She is a hypocrite!  She posted pics of Michael's alleged crypt on her Facebook page which mysteriously ended up in the hands of the media - yes, that VERY jungle she keeps ranting on about.  And I heard a while back that she might be writing a book about the time she worked with Michael.

Ah, I think you might be on to something.  Hype, outrage, and controversy would sell lots of books, no?  Not to me, mind you, but to somebody. Probably just looking for her piece of the pie like apparently lots of others are doing.  For all we know she could have been one of the animals in that jungle. If she saw what was happening and did nothing she's just as guilty in my book. There were no innocent bystanders. JMO of course, cause I know nothing.
Exactly!  She's not as innocent as she makes out.  She professes how close she was to Michael yet she just stood by and watched.  To me, the lady doth protest TOO much!!!

"Michael, I am here for you always.  I give you my heart, my soul and I offer you my friendship."

Naila-seekin-Ramas

February 02, 2010, 06:44:25 AM #16 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Hi everybody
it is sad to me saying this to you all.
I love Michael in a special way that I don't intend or need to discuss here but this is not the point.
The point , in my humble opinion, is that you all just are unfair with Karen 'cause she is saying to us from the first day that M is dead and simply you don't like it.

I wish you to consider that maybe she is NOT involved in the hoax, maybe she simply KNOW NOTHING about it.
I think she is just worried seeing the children "in the jaws of the tiger" this way just like their father was....too soon.
If i am right, she is just telling us how she feel......heartbroken!!!!
I can understand her because I think I fell the same if I were not a believer...

Just be kind to her, guys....she is completely blind in this situation I'm afraid...
And in this case, she got my support
:(

PS
I now expect you to tell me "But she claimed to made up M's Face for the burial"....
Well, I am not sure this is something that SHE said...
If it is so, maybe she made up another's face, I remember a theory of a very sick lookalike that takes Michael place in the end in order to make all the stuff more believeble...
I do not have a real answer... but I have this strong feeling that she is NOT into it...

This is the sweetest thing I ever saw, and for a 38 years old chick It\'s amazing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoNgS1XRR9I

If you are seekin for me.... cristina-anthea on skype

paula-c

February 02, 2010, 12:12:57 PM #17 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I really do not understand the Karen, if she is not in the deception, why it says make-up to Michael for the funeral?, Here We Are All Convinced that Michael is alive, and if children are in sight of all the world will know that his father does. :mrgreen:


rowdyangel

February 02, 2010, 12:45:00 PM #18 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Naila-seekin-Ramas"

Hi everybody
it is sad to me saying this to you all.
I love Michael in a special way that I don't intend or need to discuss here but this is not the point.
The point , in my humble opinion, is that you all just are unfair with Karen 'cause she is saying to us from the first day that M is dead and simply you don't like it.

I wish you to consider that maybe she is NOT involved in the hoax, maybe she simply KNOW NOTHING about it.
I think she is just worried seeing the children "in the jaws of the tiger" this way just like their father was....too soon.
If i am right, she is just telling us how she feel......heartbroken!!!!
I can understand her because I think I fell the same if I were not a believer...

Just be kind to her, guys....she is completely blind in this situation I'm afraid...
And in this case, she got my support
:(

PS
I now expect you to tell me "But she claimed to made up M's Face for the burial"....
Well, I am not sure this is something that SHE said...
If it is so, maybe she made up another's face, I remember a theory of a very sick lookalike that takes Michael place in the end in order to make all the stuff more believeble...
I do not have a real answer... but I have this strong feeling that she is NOT into it...

I don't believe she is involved in the hoax - she gives me the impression from all of her rants that she suspects something fishy is going on i.e. the hoax, and she's bitter because she isn't in on it and has therefore decided to try to flush MJ out on her own.

If she is truly heartbroken why can't she show some dignity instead of having a war of words with everyone else that Michael was involved with?


"Michael, I am here for you always.  I give you my heart, my soul and I offer you my friendship."

VeryLittleSusie

February 02, 2010, 12:52:43 PM #19 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I'd read this between the lines:

On facebook today:

I am devastated. No justice anywhere. Michael's children exploited, Michael's family disrespected...
NOT ONLY were they not invited to the Grammy's .....

Exploited? By whom? C'mon, they were accepting their father's award!

Michael's siblings were NOT invited to participate in WE ARE THE WORLD tonight either
So what? Taht would be the same as in 1985. It's meant to be different!

The children were used for ratings and the selling of the DVD.
Did they mention DVD? They mentioned their father, as far as my ears don't lie...

the children have been thrust into the exact same jungle that devoured Michael.
even the location (Staple Center)....

I don't see any jungle, or at leat she means the jungle from "The Eath's Song" video :)

the same people surround the children that dismissed Michael's mental and physical condition for the sake of their show...
3T's and Lionel Richie "Dismissed Michael's mental and physical condition???  :shock: I didn't know about that! LOL

of course the children want to honor and walk in their fathers footsteps (he was killed, remember?) but they are still minors, and not ready to make an educated decision.
If he was killed, why not let them honor? Wait! If he was killed, why on earth don't YOU, his devoted friend don't scream to the world to go and get this killer??? Instead of it you sell bracelets!?

Their father is no longer here to teach them the dangers, which he knew well. Michael knew enough to keep his children away from the media beasts...
I guess they are with HIS MOTHER - the same lady who TAUGHT HIM all these values! Do you think she forgot them???

if he wanted this for his children, you would have seen his children in the spotlight while he was alive.
EXACTLY! He wants them to be in the spotlight so they are in the spotlight! He already showed them without masks in May! Memba??

the Jackson family begged Katherine not to allow it, but their plea's were disregarded.
Uh huh! Catherine is a greedy monster who wants to spoil her grandkids by putting them in the spotlight and in the hands of media beasts! Yeah, right, give me a break!

Sorry, I had to get this out of my chest!  :evil:
Please, click "I Like It" on my Facebook page if you like my drawings :) http://www.facebook.com/artbozenawojtas
 

city.gal1

February 02, 2010, 01:17:16 PM #20 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I'm not going to be pro or con on Karen Faye but here are a couple of tidbits that make me think perhaps she is right when she says the children were exploited.

According to various things that I have read and seen reported on TV, it was Katherine that was upset supposedly that no one from the Jackson family was invited to the Grammy Tribute.  It was then that the idea of the kids accepting the award came about.

As far as the actual acceptance speeches, it was reported yesterday that supposedly Paris did not want to speak but Katherine asked her to "say a few words".  (BTW Prince wrote his own speech and did not read it from a teleprompter.)

In reading various books and such with regard to MJ's life, I have come across many statements with regard to Katherine that say that she is not the shrinking violet that she is portrayed as, and was in fact, a driving force behind her children's careers.  Remember, she is the one that applied pressure to MJ to take part in the Victory tour.  He didn't want to but because his mother told him that the brothers  really needed him he did -- I have read in many places that this is something that he really did not want to do.

So maybe KF has a point.  I know that there is school of thought that MJ is behind the kids' appearance for safety reasons of course that could be true as well.  Who knows?


iluvmj4eva

July 01, 2010, 02:48:52 PM #21 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I truly believe tht KF cares for Michael Jackson more than just his employee.  She worked for him for numerous years, and I believe they have a good friendship.  What puzzles me is that she goes on likes she's his grilfriend, lover, wife or whatever.  I saw her in a video with him with Bahshit and she was lying all on his lap like she was his woman or something??  She was doing a lot of talking as though they were interviewing her??  I think she had feelings for Michael more than a employee and friend. ;)  


karen-ishealive

July 01, 2010, 02:57:52 PM #22 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "iluvmj4eva"

I truly believe tht KF cares for Michael Jackson more than just his employee.  She worked for him for numerous years, and I believe they have a good friendship.  What puzzles me is that she goes on likes she's his grilfriend, lover, wife or whatever.  I saw her in a video with him with Bahshit and she was lying all on his shoulder like she was his woman or something??  She was doing a lot of talking as though they were interviewing her??  I think she had feelings for Michael more than a employee and friend. ;)  

My exact thoughts.
I don't think she's involved in the hoax though and she's incredibly bitter.

"The greatest education in the world is watching the masters at work."

Red_Rose

July 02, 2010, 05:41:33 AM #23 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

But Karen Faye is married and I think she has kids :?  ... In my opinion she loves MJ very much like a brother


Similar topics (5)