Forensic Scientist Larry Kobilinsky: Murray lied!

Started by MJ_Facts, January 17, 2010, 07:30:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

MJ_FactsTopic starter

January 17, 2010, 07:30:56 AM Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Forensic Scientist Larry Kobilinsky talks about Michael Jackson homicide and Conrad Murray

http://site2.mjeol.com/video/video-kobi ... urray.html

Primary cause of death: "Acute propofol intoxication" contradicts what Murray says (he stated that he only administered 25 mg)

Okay, and they say that  :?  "lethal levels" were found in MJs system.
So, does anybody know HOW MUCH (MILLIGRAM) PROPOFOL they found in his system????


Grace

January 17, 2010, 07:38:46 AM #1 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

System is not equal body.

Create your day. Create the most astounding year of your life. Be the change you want to see in the world! L.O.V.E.
***********************************************************************************************
"I am tired, I am really tired of manipulation." Michael Jackson, Harlem, New York, NY, July 6, 2002
***********************************************************************************************
******* Let's tear the walls in the brains of this world down.*******

Time to BE.

MJ_FactsTopic starter

January 18, 2010, 12:06:02 PM #2 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

The preliminary toxicology reports cited in the court records said that "lethal levels" of propofol were found in Jackson's blood, ...

http://site2.mjeol.com/mj-news/la-times ... dd-up.html


the_gloved_one

January 18, 2010, 01:15:23 PM #3 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

What we do know for certain is that somebody is lying because 25mg is not a lethal does its much less than the recommended dosage of  1-2.5mg/kg , if we consider Michaels weight. The low dose may have been due to Murray pumping Michael full of benzodiazepines before administering the propofol. As i said in a previous post, toxicology results are of limited value in this circumstance as they do not always show a lethal level of propofol at autopsy. The crime scene probably offers better evidence  as there are likely to be discarded vials of propofol  left behind or in this case just ask the doc.



Where there is L.O.V.E I\'ll be there

Similar topics (5)