Odd New Ambulance Photo Discovered on EMT Forum

Started by SeeingClues, January 04, 2010, 05:51:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic
The first post content
Hello everyone,
We discussed this in chat last night after discovering this image in a new hoax video.   After some research, the photo was linked to an EMT discussion forum - a poster named "Daphne" asked the EMT's if the ambulance looked to be an older or new one based on the photo.

At first we thought..hmm...is this the undiscovered "original" photo, or did "Daphne" photoshop the face to disguise MJ when posting.

Since it caused quite a stir in chat I wanted to open this up to all of the investigators on here.  I've tried to PM "Daphne" to inquire about the photo...
[attachment=2:2boxei83]post-4784-125882324738.jpg[/attachment:2boxei83]

Here is a screen shot and web address of the message board this was found on (you have to register on the site to view the post "live")


I tried to compare this photo with an existing ambulance photo I had, but the photo I had wasn't the same exact photo (not as much of the background is visible).  If anyone has an exact match of the equivalent photo with MJ, please post. Scroll to see both pics...


So one of these photos is a photoshop... which one?   The new one is either a photoshop or an old man...

  Link

pants

January 04, 2010, 08:40:58 AM #15 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Yes,it looks like some kind of colour enhancement or flash has made the colours a little odd on the 2nd one.Look at the colours of the arms-they're yellow


SeeingCluesTopic starter

January 04, 2010, 08:45:38 AM #16 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

but then on the other hand, in the new photo, the image of the red car blocks less of the photo underneath allowing it to show through better.   this is so odd!!

Share The Light
twitter.com/SeeingClues

Alem (Thetruth)

January 04, 2010, 08:49:49 AM #17 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Anyone could have blurred that photo, I think both of the pics are fake and fabricated.

All he wanted was the mountain high
Beyond these boundaries,he wanted to fly
In nature\'s scheme,never to die
– MJ



www.twitter.com/alem_mj

pants

January 04, 2010, 08:52:55 AM #18 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I wonder,that as the camera was an expensive & professional one(anywhere between £750-£1300 ( there was a post about the camera used on this forum or another),there were various settings which give various results of the same photo-does that make sense?


doreentbird

January 04, 2010, 08:55:00 AM #19 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

IT IS THE SAME PICTURE..but is it michael? can any one blow this up more???


KingMJ

January 04, 2010, 09:00:47 AM #20 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "SeeingClues"

is this the "old man" that the paramedics are quoted as working on?

That was my 1st thought.. playing devils advocate here (trying to see from both sides of the argument) IF Michael did really die that day.. what if it was true about him being bald underneath his wigs.. and that this new photo is infact the original photo that was taken that day?  That would explain the paramedics claim that they didn't recognise him and thought it was just an bald, older man.  It would also explain why we are so sure that the ambulance photo that was all over the press, was photoshopped somehow?  Is it possible that the guy who took the photo, realised MJ's face wasn't very clear, so edited it to make it more obvious?

Melzy777

January 04, 2010, 09:01:30 AM #21 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I've found 2 differences in the 2 photos and have circled them. I can't explain what's going on with the face yet, but it's not consistent with the ambo pic we're all familiar with.  ;)

"They're coming to a rock and roll concert and watching television. That says it all." - Larry Mullen jr on the ZooTV experience.

MJFOREVER

January 04, 2010, 09:02:53 AM #22 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I dont get it :roll:

It's the same picture ony photoshopped :roll: so what is the big deal here??


MJFOREVER

January 04, 2010, 09:03:36 AM #23 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "Melzy777"

I've found 2 differences in the 2 photos and have circled them. I can't explain what's going on with the face yet, but it's not consistent with the ambo pic we're all familiar with.  ;)

There are 2 ambulance photos so :roll:


Melzy777

January 04, 2010, 09:05:39 AM #24 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "MJFOREVER"

There are 2 ambulance photos so :roll:

So?? Why don't you go do something more useful while people who are curious speculate.  :roll:

"They're coming to a rock and roll concert and watching television. That says it all." - Larry Mullen jr on the ZooTV experience.

mirandacnc

January 04, 2010, 09:13:12 AM #25 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

idk i think this is the same photo and someone lightened up and maybe used eraser on photoshop to f@#k with us :evil:


SeeingCluesTopic starter

January 04, 2010, 09:27:31 AM #26 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

after seeing the red circled parts it looks like it was two photos perhaps shot one after the other..
whether the bald and turned head is the real one or if either of these photos is real is the mystery here.

Share The Light
twitter.com/SeeingClues

nevernevernever

January 04, 2010, 10:02:54 AM #27 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
Quote from: "MJFOREVER"

Quote from: "Melzy777"

I've found 2 differences in the 2 photos and have circled them. I can't explain what's going on with the face yet, but it's not consistent with the ambo pic we're all familiar with.  ;)

There are 2 ambulance photos so :roll:

Nop . it s just 2 different levels of contrast . In the first one too low , in the second one too high.

lisap27

January 04, 2010, 10:12:14 AM #28 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

i think the 2nd one is fake!! the face is weird and like someone said the tube is going into his neck or under his chin.. someone is causing a stir for attention i think.. cos thing have gone quiet for a while!! :shock:


SeeingCluesTopic starter

January 04, 2010, 10:17:46 AM #29 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

or that poster on the EMT forum distorted the face in order for the EMTs to answer the question on the age of the ambulance without being obvious that they were asking about the MJ photo?

Even the photo we are familiar with is odd because the breathing device is on his chin/mouth instead of covering the nose and mouth.

Share The Light
twitter.com/SeeingClues

Similar topics (5)