Blog

[BettyZ]

[tabarea]

[tab=Faking Michael Podcast]

Full Summary of the "Faking Michael" Podcast

Following the passing of Michael Jackson, a collection of unreleased tracks was released, but controversy quickly emerged as his family and fans alleged that some of these tracks were fakes, featuring vocals by an impersonator rather than Jackson himself. Faking Michael delves into this scandal with fresh, compelling evidence, providing an investigative journey into what could be one of the music industry's most significant deceptions.

For a detailed exploration, click the tabs above to access full episode summaries and the podcast's YouTube videos.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 1 – Breaking News ]

Episode 1 – Breaking News

Controversy consumes the release of Sony's first posthumous Michael Jackson album when the pop star's family accuse the record company of including "fake" songs, with vocals sung by an impostor. The songs in question, known as the Cascio tracks, were provided by Jackson's friend Eddie Cascio and his collaborative partner James Porte.

## One of the Most Controversial Music Projects: The Story Behind Michael Jackson's Posthumous Album

In December 2010, Sony Music released "Michael", an album featuring ten previously unreleased tracks by the late King of Pop, Michael Jackson. This event, eagerly anticipated by fans, swiftly became embroiled in controversy. The ethical and artistic implications of releasing such material after an artist's death were thrust into the spotlight, sparking a heated debate: was Michael Jackson truly singing on all the tracks?

### The Ethical Quandary of Posthumous Releases

When an artist passes away, the posthumous release of their work often raises numerous questions. If the songs weren't completed during the artist's lifetime, is it ethical to finish them? Which producers should be entrusted with this task? Perhaps the most significant question is whether the artist would have wanted these unfinished songs to be heard at all.

The "Michael" album was no exception. In addition to these ethical considerations, a unique and unprecedented question arose: was each track genuinely sung by Michael Jackson?

### The Unprecedented Controversy

As soon as the album announcement hit, allegations emerged from various quarters, including Jackson's family, that some of the tracks might not feature the artist's voice. Jackson's long-time producer, Teddy Riley, played a crucial role in finishing some of these tracks, emphasizing the importance of continuing Jackson's legacy. Yet, his efforts couldn't silence the growing doubts.

Among the most contentious songs were those known as the Cascio tracks, named after Jackson's friend and producer, Eddie Cascio, who claimed they were recorded in his home studio. However, listeners, including prominent Jackson family members and dedicated fans, felt the voice on these tracks didn't resemble Jackson's.

### Investigating the Claims

Damen Shields, an investigative journalist with expertise in Michael Jackson's creative work, spent over a decade looking into these claims. What started as skepticism soon seemed plausible upon hearing the tracks. Alongside his research partner, James Laay, Shields delved into what could be the largest artistic fraud in the history of the music business.

To grasp the gravity of this situation, consider the case of Milli Vanilli, which is often cited as one of the biggest scandals in music history. The duo was exposed for lip-syncing, leading to public disgrace and the loss of their Grammy Award. But as Shields and Laay argue, the potential fraud involving Michael Jackson is on an entirely different scale.

### Art Forgery in the Music Industry

Fraud in art often brings to mind forgeries in the world of physical art—such as works falsely attributed to Picasso or Da Vinci. Historically, art forgery has been a well-documented crime. However, the Cascio tracks represent a possible first in recorded music: vocal forgery.

Artistic forgery involves creating a piece in the style of a renowned artist and falsely promoting it as their original work. If the Cascio tracks are indeed forgeries, history needs to note this as the first major case of vocal art forgery.

### Shocking Revelations and Industry Impact

For over a decade, Shields and Laay's investigation took them across the globe, exposing the lies, betrayal, and murky dealings in the music industry. The findings have major implications for both the industry and the legacy of Michael Jackson.

In their research, Shields and Laay gathered extensive evidence and testimonies from Jackson's family, former collaborators, and forensic experts. The Jackson family's firm stance that the tracks were inauthentic was supported by technical and anecdotal details.

### Jackson's Estate and the Role of Sony

The controversy also brings into question the role of Sony and the executors of Jackson's estate—John Branca and John McClain, who were tasked with managing Jackson's posthumous career. Given Jackson's past conflicts with Sony over control and rights—most notably his 2002 public protests accusing the company of exploitation—many fans were bewildered that his estate would continue working closely with Sony.

### The Media and Public Perception

While mainstream media largely neglected in-depth coverage of this scandal, it did get brief attention, dismissing the family's claims as another page in Jackson's tumultuous narrative. Public reactions ranged from defensive support for the authenticity of the tracks to outraged calls for accountability.

### Forensic Analysis and Musicological Insights

Forensic musicologists and audio experts played essential roles in analyzing the disputed tracks. While some analysts confirmed the authenticity of the vocals, others, including those who had closely worked with Jackson during his lifetime, voiced serious doubts. Critical metrics, technical data, and subjective insights from trained ears shed light on this complex issue.

### What Does This Mean for Art and Artists?

The potential implications of the Cascio tracks scandal stretch far beyond Michael Jackson's legacy. If a figure as prominent as Jackson can be subjected to such alleged fraud, no artist is immune. This case amplifies the need for more stringent measures in protecting artistic integrity posthumously.

### Conclusion

In summary, the saga surrounding the "Michael" album underscores the necessity of ethical considerations and rigorous verification in posthumous releases. Shields and Laay's investigation, culminating in the podcast series "Faking Michael," offers a penetrating look into what might be the music industry's most significant scandal. It's a stark reminder of how commercialization can clash with artistic legacy and the vital importance of honesty in preserving an artist's true voice.

### Sources and Further Reading

For those interested, "Faking Michael" by Damen Shields offers a comprehensive look at this controversial story, featuring exclusive interviews, forensic insights, and a decade of meticulous research. For updates and resources, visit [fakingmichael.com](http://www.fakingmichael.com).

### Final Implications and Legacy

This controversy isn't just about one album or one artist. It calls into question the checks and balances in place for all artistic content, especially in the digital age where manipulation is easier and often harder to detect. The legacy of Michael Jackson, a pop icon whose influence spans generations, deserves the utmost respect and truthfulness, an ethos that should extend to all artists, living or deceased.

By staying vigilant and holding corporations accountable, we can ensure that the spirit and authenticity of artists like Michael Jackson are honored, not exploited. As consumers and fans, it is our duty to seek the truth and protect the art we cherish.

This investigation's findings illuminate more than just one case; they present a crucial turning point for the entire music and entertainment industry, emphasizing that the integrity of art must be preserved at all costs.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 2 – The Aftermath ]

Episode 2 – The Aftermath

The plot thickens when Sony streams one of the Cascio tracks online. Upon hearing the vocals, thousands of Michael's fans reject them as fake, joining the Jackson family in demanding that the Cascio tracks be removed from the album. But will their concerns be taken seriously?

## The Controversy Surrounding Michael Jackson's Posthumous Tracks

Michael Jackson, known as the King of Pop, left behind a monumental legacy. Following his death, interest in his music soared, and fans eagerly anticipated new material. However, the release of posthumous tracks raised serious questions about their authenticity, leading to one of the most controversial moments in music history.

### The Release and Immediate Backlash

In November 2010, Sony Music and the estate of Michael Jackson released a track titled "Breaking News." This was supposed to be one of the unreleased gems from Jackson's extensive vault. However, the reaction from fans was anything but positive. Many fans, including dedicated followers from the Michael Jackson community, claimed that the voice on the track did not belong to Michael Jackson.

### Initial Response from Professionals and Family

Several professionals who had previously worked with Michael Jackson, including his longtime drummer Jonathan Moffett, guitarist Jennifer Batten, and producer Rodney Jerkins, expressed their doubts about the authenticity of the vocals. Their concerns were echoed by members of Jackson's family, who were adamant that the voice was not Michael's. His daughter Paris, nephew TJ, and sister LaToya Jackson all voiced their suspicions, with Paris even identifying the singer as an impersonator, Jason Malachi.

### Who Is Jason Malachi?

Jason Malachi, an artist who had been previously mistaken for Michael Jackson on a radio show in 2007, became the focal point of the controversy. His song "Mamacita" was mistakenly broadcast as a new track by Michael Jackson, which led to widespread confusion. Despite clear denials from Jackson's camp, many listeners were convinced that Malachi's voice bore a striking resemblance to the King of Pop.

### Sony's Position and Fan Reactions

Despite the uproar, Sony Music and the estate stood firm in their position, asserting that the tracks were indeed authentic. They relied on the verification from several of Jackson's former producers and engineers, who were reportedly convinced of the authenticity of the vocals. Moreover, forensic musicologists were brought in to analyze the track, and their findings supported Sony's claims.

However, the general consensus among fans did not change. Many remained skeptical, citing the lack of Michael's unique vocal nuances and attributes in the track. This mistrust led to a widespread campaign among fans to boycott the album.

### The Role of the Media

The media played a crucial role in fueling the debate. Reporters like Roger Fredman defended the authenticity of the tracks, providing various possible explanations for why the voice might sound different. Meanwhile, social media became a battleground where fans, music professionals, and the Jackson family voiced their concerns and opinions.

### Investigative Efforts and Public Statements

Several independent investigations were launched in an attempt to uncover the truth. One notable investigative journalist, Charles Thomson, was cautious initially but soon found himself conflicted as the evidence began to mount against the authenticity of the tracks. Similarly, prominent authors and music critics, such as Joseph Vogel, who initially questioned the vocals, were swayed by the extensive investigations and expert testimonies provided by Sony and the estate.

### The Continuing Debate

Despite Sony and the estate's efforts to prove the authenticity of "Breaking News" and other tracks on the "Michael" album, doubt persisted. Former Sony VP Cory Rooney and Jackson's nephew Terrell Jackson adamantly claimed that the tracks were fraudulent, suggesting that meetings and listening sessions were not accurately represented by the estate's public statements.

### The Release and Legacy

The "Michael" album was eventually released in December 2010, including three tracks from the Cascio sessions. The controversy did not die down, and many fans continued to protest the inclusion of these tracks, feeling that they disrespected Jackson's legacy. This debate highlighted the complexities of managing and curating the posthumous artistic vision of a megastar like Michael Jackson, especially when authenticity and respect for the artist's legacy are in question.

### Conclusion

The controversy surrounding the posthumous release of "Breaking News" and other tracks attributed to Michael Jackson underscores the deep connection fans feel towards their idols and the lengths to which they will go to protect their legacy. This episode remains a poignant example of the challenges faced by estates and record labels in handling the musical heritage of legendary artists. The passion and dedication of Michael Jackson's fans demonstrate that, even in death, the King of Pop continues to inspire and provoke strong emotions and actions.

The journey to uncover the truth behind these tracks is not just about the music, but about justice, integrity, and the preservation of a legacy that has touched millions of lives around the world.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 3 – Making Michael ]

Episode 3 – Making Michael

A team of researchers, led by Faking Michael host Damien Shields, make it their mission to uncover the truth regarding the Cascio tracks by conducting an independent investigation, starting with uncovering what really happened during the production of the Michael album.

## Introduction

In the music industry, few artists have matched the iconic legacy of Michael Jackson, the "King of Pop." Yet, even legends are not immune to controversy and scandal. One such ongoing debate revolves around the authenticity of tracks from Jackson's posthumous album, "Michael," released in 2010. At the heart of this contention are the so-called Cascio tracks, which some of Jackson's family members and fans believe were not sung by Michael Jackson himself but by an imposter named Jason Malachi. This article delves into the extensive investigation undertaken to uncover the truth.

## Background: The Michael Album

Following Michael Jackson's untimely death in 2009, Sony Music and Jackson's estate signed an unprecedented deal for a series of new projects, including an album of unreleased songs. However, one glaring issue overshadowed this venture: locating genuinely unreleased, fully finished tracks with Jackson's vocals from his final years.

### The Scramble for Material

Jackson had been known to work with various artists, including Akon, will.i.am, and Ne-Yo, among others, in his final years. However, most of these collaborators revealed that Jackson hadn't recorded vocals for the tracks they had created together. After considerable searching, Sony and Jackson's estate found that they had only two unreleased songs with fully finished vocals, none from Jackson's recent recordings.

### Discovery of the Cascio Tracks

Amidst this scarcity, an article by reporter Roger Friedman emerged like a godsend, claiming that Jackson had recorded an entire album of new material in 2007 at the home studio of the Cascio family. Friedman's article created a flurry of excitement, reigniting hopes for a posthumous album populated with authentic Jackson tracks. As revealed later, the deal for these 12 tracks was as good as done, based on assurances from Jackson's long-time manager, Frank DiLeo.

## The Listening Session

After acquiring these tracks, a unique listening session was organized involving several of Jackson's former producers and engineers. The aim was to scrutinize the vocals and determine their authenticity. According to estate attorney Howard Weitzman, the team confirmed the vocals as Jackson's. However, this assertion was vehemently disputed by some who attended the session, including Jackson's nephew Terrell Jackson, who insisted the music did not sound like his uncle.

### Meeting Taryll Jackson

In the quest to uncover the veracity of the Cascio tracks, the podcast's creator met with Taryll Jackson at a Starbucks in Woodland Hills. Over a lengthy discussion, Taryll shared emails, text messages, and audio files that painted a detailed picture of the controversies surrounding these tracks. His recounting of the listening session and the subsequent family drama raised serious doubts about the vocals on the Cascio tracks.

## Teddy Riley's Involvement
### Initial Enthusiasm

Teddy Riley, Michael Jackson's long-time producer, was contacted to work on the new album. Upon hearing "Hold My Hand," a duet Jackson had recorded with Akon, Riley was moved to tears, believing he had finally received a song sung by Michael. Teddy was then given several Cascio tracks to work on, including "Monster" and "Breaking News."

### Growing Doubts

As Riley delved deeper into these tracks, he expressed growing unease about their authenticity. He listened to isolated vocals, which seemed off, perhaps due to sampling or unnatural inflections not typical of Jackson's recording mannerisms. However, Riley's role was to produce, not question the source material, so he continued his work despite his misgivings.

### Conflict and Investigation

The tension escalated when Terrell and other Jackson family members visited the studio and echoed their doubts about the vocals. Terrell insisted that the tracks were sung by someone else, possibly Jason Malachi, a singer who had previously been mistaken for Jackson. This suspicion was bolstered when Terrell played Malachi's songs side-by-side with the Cascio tracks, revealing striking similarities.

## The Power Struggle

Amid growing concerns, a power struggle ensued between various stakeholders. Estate executors were divided, with John McClain sceptical about moving forward with more Cascio tracks while others, including Sony executives, were eager to release them. The controversy heightened tensions among those working on the album, with threats and frustrations being exchanged behind closed doors.

## The Final Verdict

Despite Teddy Riley's increasing reservations and assurances that he would act in accordance with the Jackson family's wishes, he continued to work on the Cascio tracks. The motivations were complex, involving not only professional integrity but also significant financial incentives tied to completing the tracks.

### Financial Considerations

Facing substantial financial pressures, Riley's commitment to the project was perhaps influenced by the lucrative offers on the table, including a Cirque du Soleil production deal. These pressures possibly contributed to his decision to keep working on tracks despite their questionable authenticity.

## The Aftermath

In the final analysis, the podcast promises to reveal further intricacies behind the scenes of the Michael album's production. The creator vowed to reach out to everyone mentioned by Terrell to piece together a comprehensive narrative of what transpired during the production of an album meant to honour the legacy of one of music's greatest icons.

### Continuing Investigation

The controversy over the Cascio tracks has not been fully resolved, and the podcast continues to investigate, scrutinize, and fact-check every detail. The goal remains to tell the story accurately, capturing the truth of an industry scandal few were meant to hear about.

## Conclusion

The making of Michael Jackson's posthumous album "Michael" highlights the complexities and challenges of handling an artist's unreleased work, especially when authenticity and legacy are on the line. This investigation underscores the importance of preserving artistic integrity and the lengths to which true fans and family members will go to protect the legacy of the King of Pop. As the podcast series progresses, it promises to uncover further revelations, ensuring that the story is told comprehensively and accurately.

Stay tuned for more updates as this gripping investigation unfolds, shedding light on a chapter of music history shrouded in doubt and intrigue.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 4 – Listening Session ]

Episode 4 – Listening Session

After questions are raised over the authenticity of the Cascio tracks, several of Michael Jackson's former collaborators attend a listening session and offer their opinion on the vocals.

## The Controversy Surrounding Michael Jackson's Posthumous Album

In 2010, the world of Michael Jackson fans and music enthusiasts was shaken to its core with the release of a posthumous album titled "Michael." What could have been a celebration of the King of Pop's legacy instead turned into a heated controversy over the authenticity of the vocal tracks. Rumours, scepticism, and disbelief swirled around three specific tracks: "Breaking News," "Monster," and "Keep Your Head Up."

### The Initial Doubts

The controversy began when acclaimed producer Teddy Riley was approached by the Jackson estate to work on a set of unreleased Michael Jackson recordings. Riley, a trusted collaborator of Jackson, was shocked to find that the vocals on several tracks sounded nothing like the pop icon. The producers' scepticism was immediately heightened when renowned recording engineer Michael Prince delivered the materials. Prince, who was well-acquainted with Jackson's work, was equally baffled. He recounted being asked by Jackson's brother, Jermaine, whether Michael would ever sing lyrics mentioning his own name – a bizarre suggestion that seemed incongruent with the artist's style. This peculiarity came to light when Prince heard "Breaking News," a track where Jackson's name was prominently sung – something out of character for the artist.

### Identifying the Fakes

Concerns escalated further when Prince linked additional questionable tracks to Michael Jackson's previous sessions. Notably, "Monster" rang alarms, with Prince recalling an entirely different song bearing the same name that Jackson had worked on for the "Invincible" album – a song long abandoned and never completed. Moreover, "Keep Your Head Up" was immediately flagged by Prince for containing vocal adlibs distinctly recognized from Jackson's "Earth Song."

### Meeting the Estate's Demands

As doubts surrounding the Casio tracks intensified, the Jackson estate's focus shifted to "Hollywood Tonight," a song unequivocally recognized as Jackson's work. However, behind the scenes, producer Teddy Riley urgently sought validation, leading to a tense encounter involving the Jackson family, audio engineers, and estate representatives. Prince, alongside other industry professionals, identified several technical deficiencies that were absent in Jackson's authentic recordings – including a lack of characteristic hand claps, snaps, and foot stomps. Furthermore, samples from previously released Jackson tracks were hastily pasted into new songs, raising further suspicions.

### Uncovering Deceptive Practices

One of the most contested tracks, "Breaking News," underwent an even closer inspection when the isolated lead vocal – stripped of instrumental accompaniment – was dissected. It became apparent that Jackson's usual stylistic nuances, along with audible feedback expected from high headphone volumes, were conspicuously missing. Despite these unravelling inconsistencies, some team members were initially convinced they were genuine Jackson recordings, mainly due to the profound respect they maintained for Eddy Casio, one of the tracks' primary producers.

### Scrutinizing the Voice

Further scrutiny into the vocal characteristics solidified the suspicions. Primarily, the vibrato – a technical signature of Jackson's vocal control – diverged drastically from his known work. The vibrato on the contested tracks was erratic, contrasting sharply with Jackson's customary precision. Comparisons with tracks known to feature Michael's actual voice underscored these inconsistencies, further impugning the legitimacy of the Casio tracks.

### Escalated Confrontations within the Estate

As the debates grew more intense, attempts to engage directly with Eddy Casio led to further disappointment. Despite promising transparency, Casio and his collaborator failed to produce the necessary outtakes, hard drives, and session files. Their claims of data destruction only fuelled doubts about the legitimacy of their submissions.

### The Divided Opinions

With everyone assembled for a critical meeting, the Jackson estate called a listening session to evaluate the suspect tracks. Engineers and long-time collaborators were divided. Veterans such as Michael Prince and Matt Forger shared doubts and pointed out technical anomalies inconsistent with Jackson's meticulous recording habits. Prince, in particular, highlighted that signature indicators like headphone bleed and Jackson's rhythmic physicality – staples of his recordings – were absent.

### Reaction from Industry Professionals

Former Sony Vice President Cory Rooney emerged as a vocal critic during the session. He questioned the motives behind pushing these potentially fraudulent tracks, especially when the Jackson estate had legitimate unreleased material at its disposal. Rooney's arguments fortified longstanding suspicions and challenged the integrity of the Casio tracks.

### An Offer Turned Demand

The situation took an unexpected turn when Teddy Riley, despite his early apprehensions about the vocals, requested a stake in the publishing rights for "Hollywood Tonight" – a demand that left his manager, Leanda, perplexed. The pursuit for personal gain amidst an authenticity scandal complicated the narrative further, bringing into question the motives behind the involved parties' actions.

### Tension at the Listening Session

The listening session aimed at resolving the authenticity questioned only deepened the crisis. Experts highlighted glaring inconsistencies when the tracks were played a cappella, revealing hasty edits and pasted vocals. The revelation that recognizable adlibs from Jackson's other releases had been stitched into new work underscored the fraudulent effort.

### Conclusion: Release or Refrain

Faced with undeniable discrepancies, the Michael estate representatives, including attorney Howard Weitzman, vacillated between scepticism and a surprising allegiance to the Casio tracks. Despite evidence suggesting the involvement of vocalist Jason Malachi – an assertion rigorously defended by Jackson's family members and an array of engineers – financial stakes appeared to influence decisions. Leanda, tasked with verifying track legitimacy, ultimately encountered an unwavering stance from the estate geared toward releasing the controversial tracks despite overwhelming objections.

### Final Thoughts

The Michael Jackson posthumous album controversy underlines deeper issues within the music industry – from artistic integrity to commercial exploitation. Advocates for Jackson's authentic legacy hoped that thorough examinations and testimonies would steer the estate and Sony toward a scrupulous release, rooted in preserving true artistry. The unfolding of events overruled those aspirations, cementing the controversy as a defining chapter in Michael Jackson's enduring legacy. The tension between profit and passion remains a pivotal discussion reflecting on the legacies upheld in the world's musical archives.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 5 – Weitzman's Statement ]

Episode 5 – Weitzman's Statement

Eddie Cascio and James Porte are asked to explain the issues with the vocals on the Cascio tracks, but their response raises more questions than answers. Despite this, the Estate and Sony each issue statements asserting the authenticity of the vocals.

## The Controversy Surrounding Michael Jackson's Posthumous Tracks

The mysterious circumstances surrounding the release of Michael Jackson's posthumous tracks have captured the curiosity and scrutiny of fans, experts, and the media alike. This story unfolds a complex web of intrigue, conflicting testimonies, and an undying passion for music and truth. Here, we delve deep into the heart of the matter, analyzing the various elements involved in what has become one of the most controversial releases in modern music history.

### The Origins of the Dispute

In October 2010, controversy erupted over the authenticity of vocal tracks purportedly recorded by Michael Jackson in the years leading up to his death. The Casio family, close friends of Jackson, claimed to have recorded a dozen songs featuring Jackson's vocals in their home studio. However, when these tracks surfaced, they were met with widespread scepticism.

### The Listening Session

Two days after the initial outcry, a pivotal listening session was convened on October 17, 2010. This session brought together some of the industry's most seasoned professionals—engineers and producers—who had worked with Jackson over the decades. Notable participants included Michael Prince, Teddy Riley, and others who had been directly involved in Jackson's previous recordings.

Despite these efforts, the unanimous conclusion that Sony and the Estate sought failed to materialize. Some present asserted that the vocals were authentic, while others voiced significant doubts.

### The Meeting at the Estate

Following the listening session, the controversy continued to simmer. On October 19, 2010, Eddie Casio and James Port were summoned to the Los Angeles office of the estate's co-executive, John Branca. Accompanied by their attorney and studio engineer Stuart Brawley, Casio and Port faced intense scrutiny. They were expected to provide indisputable evidence proving the vocals' authenticity.

### Missing Evidence and Rising Suspicion

The Casio team's response to the probing questions only fuelled further suspicion. Casio and Port claimed that Jackson had ordered the destruction of all other vocal takes, backups, and outtakes after being satisfied with the final comp. This explanation did not sit well with Michael Prince and others who were familiar with Jackson's meticulous recording practices. Everyone knew that Jackson never erased any recordings, always keeping multiple backups of his work.

### Forensic Analysis and Expert Opinions

In an attempt to resolve the issue, the Estate and Sony hired forensic analysts to verify the tracks. Two prominent forensic musicologists conducted waveform analyses and compared the vocals to Jackson's previous works. Both concluded that the tracks were indeed sung by Michael Jackson. However, the names of these experts and their detailed reports were kept confidential, raising doubts about the transparency of the investigation.

### Conflicting Testimonies

Numerous industry professionals provided conflicting opinions. Notably, Quincy Jones and Brad Buxer, who had profound knowledge of Jackson's vocal characteristics, expressed doubts about the authenticity of the tracks. Meanwhile, Greg Phillinganes and Dorian Holley, mentioned in the public statement, were said to have confirmed the authenticity of the vocals, though Dorian later privately expressed doubt.

### Teddy Riley's Role

Producer Teddy Riley, a central figure in this saga, had a particularly complex role. Initially voicing scepticism about the tracks, Riley's stance shifted during key meetings, leading to public endorsements of the vocals' authenticity. This flip-flop raised questions about Riley's motivations, especially considering his financial remuneration for his work on the album.

### Family Reactions and Public Outcry

The Jackson family vehemently opposed the release of the Casio tracks, believing they were fake. Jackson's nephews, particularly Taryll Jackson, were vocal in their disapproval, suggesting that releasing the tracks would defraud the public. The broader fanbase echoed these sentiments, causing a public relations nightmare for Sony and the Estate.

### The Oprah Winfrey Interview

As the controversy raged, Oprah Winfrey interviewed the Casio family and Teddy Riley in an attempt to quell public doubt. Eddie Casio and Teddy Riley reassured the audience that the vocals were authentic, but suspiciously omitted any mention of James Port. This interview broadcast left many questions unanswered, further intensifying fan scepticism.

### The Aftermath for Key Individuals

For Taryll Jackson and other vocal critics within the Jackson family, opposing the tracks came at a significant personal and professional cost. Taryll's promising music career opportunities were derailed, leaving a bitter taste and a sense of betrayal. On the other hand, Teddy Riley received various forms of compensation, raising ethical questions about his involvement and shifting public statements.

### The Persistent Mystery

The controversy did not dissipate with the album's release. The unanswered questions and the lack of transparency continued to haunt the project. Despite attempts to authenticate the tracks, the conflicting testimonies and hidden forensic reports left an unresolved tension that persisted within the Jackson community.

### The Bigger Picture

This story isn't just about contested tracks; it's a tale of legacy, trust, and the impact of monetary interests on artistic integrity. Michael Jackson's name continues to wield immense commercial power, and the decisions made in his absence highlight the complex interplay between commerce, memory, and artistry.

Jackson's true fans continue to seek clarity and authenticity in the material purportedly created by their idol. Their persistent questioning underscores a dedication not just to Jackson's music, but to preserving the veracity of his legacy against the waves of commercial exploitation and misinformation.

### Conclusion

The case of the Casio tracks serves as a fascinating and complex chapter in the history of music production, fan culture, and legal considerations in posthumous releases. It reminds us of the profound impact an artist like Michael Jackson has, not just in life but in the lasting legacy left behind. It is a tale of intrigue, passionate debate, and the enduring quest for truth in the face of powerful commercial forces.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 6 – Meet the Family & Episode 7 – Mamacita Explosion ]

Episode 6 – Meet the Family

Eddie Cascio and James Porte are the creators of the Cascio tracks. In this episode we break down each of their stories, including how they ended up working together on songs for Michael Jackson.

Episode 7 – Mamacita Explosion

In 2007, when his song "Mamacita" was mistaken for a new Michael Jackson song, Jason Malachi shot to fifteen minutes of fame. In this episode we detail Jason's backstory, and how his career intersected with the life and death of the King of Pop.

## Unravelling the Controversy: The Michael Jackson Question

In the first five episodes of "Faking Michael," a podcast dedicated to investigating the controversy surrounding Michael Jackson's posthumous music releases, audiences were introduced to a complex narrative involving billion-dollar deals, alleged imposters, and a family that Michael Jackson reportedly considered his own. Below, we delve deeper into the controversy, exploring the key figures involved and the intricate web of events that led to one of the most debated moments in music history.

### The Billion-Dollar Deal

Following Michael Jackson's untimely demise, his estate signed a groundbreaking $200 million deal with Sony, which spanned 10 projects over seven years. Among these projects was the controversial "Michael" album released in December 2010. The album featured tracks that some fans and family members claimed were inauthentic, sparking widespread debate. Central to this controversy were three songs reportedly co-written and recorded by Jackson during his final years with Eddie Casio and James Port.

### The Allegations

When the "Michael" album launched, it was met with scepticism. Many fervent Jackson fans and some family members asserted that the vocals on specific tracks were not authentic. Instead, these voices were alleged to belong to Jason Malachi, a singer known for his uncanny vocal similarity to Jackson. The controversy garnered more attention when Tony Curtis, Malachi's long-time producer, chimed in, insisting that the vocals were indeed Malachi's and not Jackson's.

### Who Are Eddie Casio, James Port, and Jason Malachi?

To fully grasp the complexity of the situation, it's essential to understand who Eddie Casio, James Port, and Jason Malachi are and how they fit into Michael Jackson's life.

#### Eddie Casio's Background

Born in 1982, Edward Joseph Casio grew up in a tight-knit Italian-American family in New Jersey. The Casio family's relationship with Michael Jackson dates back to 1984 when Dominic Casio, Eddie's father, met Jackson at the Helmsley Palace Hotel in New York City. This encounter sparked a friendship that eventually extended to the entire Casio family.

Over the years, Michael found a sense of comfort with the Casios, often staying with them unannounced and partaking in regular family activities. Eddie, who began learning the piano at a tender age, often performed for Jackson. Encouraged by Jackson, Eddie eventually began writing his own songs, with Jackson serving as a mentor.

### James Port and His Connection to Jackson

James Victor Port was born in Liberia in 1972 and raised in Tennessee. Port's fascination with Michael Jackson began during his college years at Middle Tennessee State University, where he studied recording industry management. Described as a true Jackson fanatic by his former roommate Jerome Booker, Port adorned his dorm room with Jackson memorabilia and immersed himself in Jackson's music.

After graduating, Port secured positions at New York's prominent recording studios, Battery Studios and the Hit Factory, where he eventually came into Jackson's orbit during the production of the "Invincible" album. Port's technical expertise and dedication quickly earned him Jackson's trust, leading to future collaborations.

### The Relationship Between Casio, Port, and Jackson

Eddie Casio and James Port's roles in Michael Jackson's life were significant not only personally but also professionally. Port, who first crossed paths with Eddie through Jackson, was asked to help Eddie set up a home recording studio. Together, they began writing music, with Jackson often guiding their creative process. Despite the close collaboration, none of Eddie's submitted songs made it onto Jackson's "Invincible" album. Nonetheless, Jackson used the opportunity to teach Eddie about music production and songwriting.

### Thriller 25 and Final Collaborations

During the fall of 2007, Jackson stayed with the Casio family for several months, working on projects like "Thriller 25." It was during this period, according to Eddie and supported by Jackson's security team, that Jackson, Eddie, and James reportedly co-wrote and recorded several songs in Eddie's home studio. These recordings would later form the basis of the controversial "Michael" album.

### The Mystery of Jason Malachi

Initially drawn into the controversy due to his vocal similarities to Jackson, Jason Malachi inadvertently played a key role in the unfolding saga. Songs attributed to Malachi began circulating online, further muddling the authenticity of the "Michael" tracks. Malachi, known for his Jackson-esque voice, became a focal point for debate, drawing accusations and defences from all sides. According to Malachi, producers leveraged his voice to mimic Jackson's style without explicitly crediting him, leading to widespread confusion and speculation.

### Conclusion: A Complex Legacy

The story of Eddie Casio, James Port, and Jason Malachi is a tale of close friendships, professional ambition, and one of the music industry's most enduring controversies. The allegations surrounding the "Michael" album brought to the forefront questions of authenticity, ethics, and the complexities of posthumous releases. While the full truth may never be entirely clear, the relationships and events detailed in "Faking Michael" shed light on a multifaceted narrative that continues to intrigue and divide fans worldwide. The legacy left by Casio, Port, and Malachi intertwined with Jackson's own, remains a testament to the enigmatic nature of creativity and celebrity in the modern age.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 8 – Can't Confirm or Deny ]

Episode 8 – Can't Confirm or Deny

In this episode we go over the build-up to the release of the Cascio tracks again, this time through the actions of Eddie Cascio, James Porte and their team. Then, after their release, the alleged singer of the Cascio tracks, Jason Malachi, is confronted by his longtime producer regarding the vocals.

## The Intriguing Case of the "Cascio Tracks"

The mysterious story of the "Cascio Tracks" traces back to the close relationship between pop icon Michael Jackson and the Cascio family. It opens up a web of unanswered questions, allegations, and deep-seated mysteries surrounding the authenticity of certain tracks attributed to Michael Jackson after his untimely death in June 2009. Let's delve into this convoluted saga, which reflects both the enduring legacy of Jackson and the complexities of posthumous music releases.

### Michael Jackson and the Cascio Family

Michael Jackson's friendship with the Cascio family dates back 25 years. Their bond started with casual family dinners and grew to encompass deeper professional collaborations. Eddie Cascio, a member of the Cascio family, considered Michael not just a friend, but a mentor in his musical journey. Eddie began writing songs for Jackson, dreaming of future hits, though some of his efforts were deemed "not ready" by Jackson himself during the development of the "Invincible" album.

### The Birth of the Cascio Tracks

In 1999, Jackson met James Porte at New York's Hit Factory recording studio. Introduced by Jackson, Eddie Cascio and James Porte began collaborating on various musical projects. Fast forward to 2007, Jackson and his children stayed with the Cascio family for two and a half months. Eddie and James later claimed that during this period, they co-wrote and recorded 12 new tracks with Jackson in the Cascio family's basement studio.

### The Tragic Twist and Sudden Scramble

The unthinkable happened on June 25, 2009. Michael Jackson suddenly passed away, shocking the world. While Jackson's fans mourned their idol, and his family grieved their loss, a registration for "MJ Song Book 2009 Number 1" was uploaded to the US Copyright Office website. Filed just two days after Jackson's death, it included ten songs credited to Jackson, Eddie Cascio, and James Porte. Notably, many of these tracks had already been registered by Porte and Cascio between 2003 to 2008 without mentioning Jackson.

### Scrutinizing the Registrations

The investigation began unravelling inconsistencies in the registration process used by Cascio and Porte. A critical rule from the US Copyright Office states that the same creative work cannot be registered twice. However, the duo attempted to register some works first without Jackson's name and later with it, raising questions about the legitimacy of their claims. Copies of the work submitted should reflect the state of the piece as it was at the claimed creation date, but evidence pointed to multiple inconsistencies with this rule in the registrations submitted by Cascio and Porte.

### The Quest for Unreleased Material

After Michael Jackson's death, Sony and the Michael Jackson Estate aimed to curate an album of his unreleased tracks. This search revealed that Jackson had left a considerable trove of unfinished material, although fully realized tracks were sparse. Material by mainstream artists who had worked with Jackson, like R&B star Ne-Yo and producer RedOne, mostly consisted of incomplete ideas and rough demos.

Upon this backdrop, the discovery of completely finished tracks by Cascio and Porte seemed a boon for Sony and the estate. The tracks, fully completed with lead vocals purportedly by Jackson, presented an unexpected yet welcome find, ready for release.

### The First Red Flags

The demos brought to attention by Cascio and Porte were produced with the assistance of one of Jackson's former engineers, Stuart Brawley. Soon, doubts were raised about the authenticity of Jackson's vocals in these tracks. In particular, the stylistic elements of Jackson's voice seemed conspicuously absent. Skeptics questioned both the vocal performance and the mysterious disappearance of session evidence upon which the tracks were purportedly based.

### Family and Fans Push Back

Beginning with Jackson's nephew, TJ Jackson, the family expressed discomfort and skepticism regarding the Cascio Tracks. TJ's response was echoed by other family members and associates who were intimately familiar with Jackson's vocals and creative process. These doubts gained public traction, reaching a fever pitch when the estate and Sony announced that they would include three of the Cascio tracks on the album "Michael."

### The Listening Session and Fallout

On October 17, 2010, an intense listening session was held by estate attorney Howard Weitzman, where longtime associates and family members of Jackson assessed the tracks. The session concluded with divided opinions but sowed the seeds of substantial doubt.

One of the testy revelations in the meeting was that a significant proportion of the tracks sounded heavily manipulated or artificial— nothing like the natural, soul-stirring vocal performance Jackson was renowned and irreplaceable for.

### Breaking News and Public Uproar

"Breaking News" was the first of these tracks to be unveiled. Fans reacted with shock and dismay, with a significant section firmly believing the voice on the track did not belong to Michael Jackson but rather to another singer, Jason Malachi. This belief was reinforced when Jason Malachi's social media accounts seemed to confirm the suspicions before his manager called the posts fake and claimed Malachi's accounts had been hacked.

### Pandemonium and Professional Opinion

Fans and close associates continued to voice their discontent and belief that something was gravely amiss. Music professionals added fuel to the controversy. Vocal experts noted the absence of Jackson's signature breadth and emotional intensity in the Cascio tracks. While technological interference could have camouflaged the authenticity of the tracks, the emotional depth was harder to fake.

### Light in the Darkness

Despite the storm of controversy, Sony and the estate remained steadfast in their decision to release the Cascio tracks, maintaining that thorough evaluations had confirmed the vocals to be genuine. The release was mired in heightened scrutiny, legal complications, and a breach of trust among avid Jackson fans.

In December 2010, as the "Michael" album hit stores, the shroud of mystery and doubt that enveloped the Cascio tracks reflected broader concerns regarding posthumous releases. The highly public contention serves as both a lesson and a forewarning in handling and preserving an artist's legacy meticulously and respectfully.

### Conclusion

The saga of the Cascio tracks brings to light the challenges faced in maintaining the integrity of an iconic artist's work posthumously. It underscores the vital importance of transparency, thorough validation, and respect for both the artist's original work and the fans who hold that work dear. Michael Jackson's towering legacy deserves nothing less than the highest standards, ensuring that his music continues to inspire future generations in its truest form.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 9 – Provenance  ]

Episode 9 – Provenance

In this episode we examine the provenance of the Cascio tracks, tracing them back to their origins by examining a decade's worth of copyright registrations, handwritten notes and insider testimony before following their evolution into so-called "Michael Jackson" songs to establish whether or not Michael ever recorded the vocals.

## An In-depth Look at the Controversy Surrounding the Casio Tracks

For decades, Michael Jackson's music has captivated audiences worldwide. His legacy, however, took an unexpected twist with the release of the notorious Casio tracks. The controversy surrounding these tracks, which were included in the posthumous Michael album, remains one of the modern music industry's most debated issues. In this article, we delve into the intricate narrative behind the tracks, exploring perspectives from Jackson's family, collaborators, musicologists, and even the FBI's art crime division.

### The Genesis of the Casio Tracks

The first eight episodes of the investigative podcast, "Faking Michael," provide a comprehensive examination of the Casio tracks from multiple angles. Notably, through interviews with Jackson's family, fans, and former collaborators, the story unravels the complicated creation and subsequent sale of these songs.

James Porte and Eddie Casio, credited as the original producers, along with Jason Malachi, allegedly the vocalist on these tracks, defend their authenticity. Despite their assertions, mounting evidence suggests otherwise, raising questions about the legitimacy of these recordings.

### Forensic Consultation: A Closer Look

The podcast introduces expert opinions from forensic musicologists and audiologists to thoroughly scrutinize the evidence. These specialists analyse the provided tracks sceptically, evaluating their authenticity through scientific lens. With their insights, listeners gain a profound understanding of the analytical processes involved in identifying the intricacies and potential forgeries within the Casio tracks.

### Analogies to Art Forges: Perspective from the FBI

To articulate the gravity of the controversy, the story parallels art forgery with music production fraud. Robert Whitman, a former FBI agent and founder of the FBI's art crime team, asserts that the alleged Casio tracks controversy is akin to forging artworks, akin to selling a fake Jackson Pollock painting. Here, the perceived victims are Sony Music and Jackson's estate, who procured these songs believing them to be genuine Jackson creations.

### Digging Through Documentation

A pivotal element of the investigation is the meticulous review of the copyright registrations filed by James Porte and Eddie Casio at the U.S. Copyright Office. Key registrations include "MJ Song Book 2009," filed just two days after Jackson's death. This registration, among others, fuels scepticism due to discrepancies in authorship credited across different periods. Analysis reveals that songs listed under Michael Jackson's authorship posthumously were initially credited solely to James Porte during Jackson's lifetime.

### Insights from Collaborators

Another significant facet of this investigation is the testimony from those who worked on the Casio tracks during Jackson's life. For instance, Angelo Monon, a Brooklyn-based mixing engineer, recounts his work mixing tracks like "Keep Your Head Up," where only James Porte's vocals were present. This testimony further cements doubts, as Monon aimed to enhance these tracks with the hope Michael Jackson might consider recording them.

### Dissecting the Tracks: "Monster" and "Water"

"Monster" and "Water" are notable tracks within this context. Each has distinct versions: one attributable to Jackson's prior work and another linked to the Casio tracks. Separating the authentic Jackson works from the contentious versions is essential to understand the alleged fraud. For instance, the song "Monster," recorded during the Invincible album sessions in 1998-2001, starkly contrasts with the Casio version produced years later.

### Investigating the Paper Trail

The podcast highlights how the songs evolved, even after Jackson's death, raising questions about their origin. Crucially, the metadata of these tracks indicates changes and re-registrations post-2009, with all attributed to Jackson's involvement being absent. The extended development and shifting of compositions recur as red flags in the argument against their authenticity.

### Exploring the Artistic Process and Potential Motivations

Analysing testimonies and comparisons to genuine Jackson material spotlights the impetus behind such claims. Utilizing a recognizable name like Michael Jackson undoubtedly inflates market value. As some of the registrations overlapping with Jackson's death changed, it suggests an ulterior motive to capitalize on Jackson's posthumous fame.

### The Argument for Providence and Connoisseur Insight

Covering a spectrum from forensics to co-conspirator testimonies, the podcast examines every possible angle to uncover the truth behind the Casio tracks. Musicologists, forensic audiologists, and Jackson enthusiasts outline each development settled on official claims, juxtaposing them with Jackson's known unreleased materials and studio habits.

In conclusion, the Faking Michael podcast offers a thorough investigation into one of the most impactful controversies in recent music history. The detailed accounts gathered from a multitude of sources create a clear narrative highlighting the discrepancies and alleged fabrications that underpin the Casio tracks. For both Michael Jackson aficionados and those interested in music integrity, this series provides crucial insights into the complex world of legacy management in the wake of a global superstar's passing. As the analysis intensifies, fans and researchers alike await a definitive resolution to this riveting saga.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 10 – Connoisseurship ]

Episode 10 – Connoisseurship

A connoisseur is someone with expertise in a particular subject, especially an area of art. In this episode we recap the most important testimony we've heard from connoisseurs of Michael Jackson's music, while diving further even down the rabbit hole of expert opinion regarding the vocals on the Cascio tracks. Meanwhile, my research team and I give Eddie Cascio, Jason Malachi and others several opportunities to tell their side of the story.

## Understanding Art Forensics: Investigating the Alleged Michael Jackson Forgeries

In the world of art and music, authenticity holds immense value. When allegations of forgery surface, the damage can be far-reaching, affecting not just the reputation of the artists but also the stakeholders involved. A compelling case from the FBI Art Crime Team's archives serves as an insightful example of the rigorous scrutiny such cases undergo. This blog delves into the investigative process of forgeries, focusing on the alleged Michael Jackson vocal tracks known as the Casio tracks.

### Probing Provenance, Connoisseurship, and Forensics

To unravel the authenticity of artworks and musical tracks, the FBI relies on three essential pillars of investigation: provenance, connoisseurship, and forensics. These pillars were meticulously applied in investigating the Casio tracks, a set of recordings allegedly by Michael Jackson, but whose authenticity has been questionably shrouded.

#### Provenance: Tracing the Origin

In episode 9 of the podcast series, the provenance of the Casio tracks was scrutinized, and concerning gaps emerged. Provenance, the detailed documentation of an artwork's history, is indispensable. For the Casio tracks, there lacked concrete evidence validating that Michael Jackson ever recorded the vocals. By the time of Jackson's death in 2009, the tracks contained vocals reportedly by James Port. However, by the time the tracks reached the Michael Jackson estate in 2010, the vocals were purportedly replaced by what were claimed to be Jackson's own recordings, raising significant red flags.

### Exploring Connoisseurship: A Dive into Expert Opinion

Connoisseurship hinges on the expert opinions of individuals deeply familiar with a particular artist's work. In the case of Michael Jackson, a host of experts including family members, fans, and former collaborators, were brought in to gauge the authenticity of the Casio tracks.

#### Major Red Flags Raised by Experts

Key telltale signs pointed experts to question the authenticity of the Casio tracks. Darren Hayes, a renowned recording artist, immediately identified discrepancies upon hearing the Casio track "Breaking News". Hayes, who had studied Michael Jackson's voice meticulously, noted that the vibrato in the Casio tracks significantly deviated from Jackson's signature style. Hayes emphasized that vibrato is unique and akin to a vocal fingerprint, hard to replicate even with adept technique and sustained practice.

Other experts echoed Hayes' sentiments, highlighting distinct vocal nuances and stylistic deviations that were inconsistent with Jackson's known recordings. Jamon Bull, another researcher and lifelong fan, joined the chorus, elaborating on rapid vibratos and unusual inflections that strayed from Jackson's typical vocal habits.

#### The Lyrics and Their Authenticity

The lyrics of the Casio tracks, particularly "Breaking News," also drew scepticism. These experts noted the awkward phrasing and lyrical construction that poorly mirrored Jackson's renowned lyrical prowess. Darren Hayes, alongside many others, expressed doubt that Jackson would ever refer to himself in the grandiose manner depicted in the Casio tracks, especially with the moniker "King of Pop" that sorely stood out as unauthentic.

### The Credibility of Key Characters

The narrative pushed by James Port and Eddie Casio, who claimed that Jackson recorded these tracks at their home studio in 2007, further weakened under scrutiny. Jackson's recording practices during that period, as recounted by longtime recording engineer Michael Prince, involved minimal vocal recordings. Jackson, wary of leaks, typically avoided laying down extensive vocals until fully confident in the recording's security.

### Examining Forensic Evidence

Forensic evidence also played a crucial role in dissecting the Casio tracks. Notably, the claimed erasure of all original vocal outtakes by Jackson's collaborators raised significant doubts. Michael Prince and other expert engineers present asked for secondary backups, revealing the absurdity of an artist destroying all auxiliary records in an industry where redundancy is critical.

### The Role of Connoisseurship in Forensics

Experts, considered connoisseurs, scrutinized vocal patterns, lyrical authenticity, and Jackson's historical recording habits:

- **Michael Prince**, a core part of Jackson's recording endeavours, pointed out:

- The absence of Jackson's habitual sounds like finger snaps and foot stomps in the Casio tracks.

- The improbability that Jackson would record fully rendered vocals in a casual home studio set-up.

- **Stuart Brawley**, an engineer who reportedly worked on the Casio tracks posthumously, cryptically remarked his role was to "make it sound like Michael," which further muddled authenticity.

### Breaking the Silence: Figures Approaching Authenticity

While Eddie Casio appeared on Oprah Winfrey's show staunchly defending the Casio tracks' authenticity, questions lingered. Conversations with:

- **Jerome Booker**, a former associate of James Port, confirmed meticulous completion of tracks before presenting.

- **Amy Gilvary**, highlighted how Port demonstrated a professional studio set-up, invalidating the notion of amateurish home recordings.

### Expert Alignment: Broad Concurrence on Forgeries

Multiple testimonies continued to assert the abnormality concerning the Casio tracks:

- **Tony Kurtis**, a producer closely familiar with Jason Malachi, alongside **AJ Dugger** and others, argued persistently that the true vocalist was Malachi, not Jackson.

- Repeated avoidance or vague admissions from Malachi when confronted raised further suspicions over the track's legitimacy.

### Making the Final Determination: A Need for Honesty

Despite attempts to clarify and authenticate these tracks, evasive tactics by key figures only solidified doubts. The Casio tracks' dubious authenticity, amplified by circumstantial irregularities, lyrical inconsistencies, and deliberate non-clarifications, left a heavy shadow over the endeavour.

Thus, in unravelling such persistent forgeries, the combined insights from provenance, connoisseurship, and rigorous forensics underscore the critical need for transparency. Authenticating art—whether tangible or auditory—requires undiverted dedication to genuine evidence and unwavering honesty from all parties involved.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 11 – Forensics ]

Episode 11 – Forensics

Forensic evidence can be crucial in identifying whether or not a crime has been committed. In this episode we hear from several top experts regarding the forensic evidence in the case of the Cascio tracks, including a leading forensic musicologist, a veteran forensic audiologist, and a world-renowned vocal coach.

## The Cascio Tracks Controversy: An In-Depth Examination

The ongoing debate surrounding the authenticity of the "Cascio tracks" has captivated fans and critics alike. These songs, which some claim were recorded by Michael Jackson, have been mired in controversy since their release. To understand the arguments for and against their authenticity, we must explore the provenance, connoisseurship, and forensics related to these tracks. Each of these perspectives provides crucial insights into whether or not these tracks genuinely feature the voice of the King of Pop.

### Provenance: Tracing the Origins of the Cascio Tracks

In earlier episodes of "Faking Michael," we've dissected the historical records and various claims about the origins of the Cascio tracks. These songs, ranging from recordings as early as 2003 to others supposedly finalized in 2009, have no verified instances of Michael Jackson's vocals before his death. According to records, one thing is certain: by the time these tracks were sold to Michael's estate in 2010, they featured vocals that were purported to be Michael Jackson's, though many fans and experts doubt this claim.

### Connoisseurship: The Ear of the Aficionado

When listening to these tracks, several of Michael's close collaborators and aficionados immediately raised concerns. Their deep familiarity with Michael's voice unearthed glaring discrepancies that suggested the vocals might be those of another singer, possibly Jason Malachi.

A notable example is sound engineer Brad Buxer, who remarked on the distinct difference in the vibrato and tonal quality of the vocals. His observations were echoed by Michael's family members and countless fans, all of whom felt something was off.

Connoisseurship depends heavily on perception, making it susceptible to bias and subjective error. Hence, the need for forensic analysis becomes apparent.

### Forensic Musicology and Audiology

Given the polarizing nature of connoisseur opinions, objective forensic analysis is indispensable. Initial claims from Sony and Michael's estate stated that forensic musicologists had authenticated the vocals as Michael Jackson's. Yet, these findings were never publicly disclosed, leading sceptics to call for independent verification.

#### Professor Joe Bennett's Approach

Professor Joe Bennett, a forensic musicologist, was consulted to evaluate the methods and conclusions of the estate's experts. Bennett noted that a thorough investigation would require methodologies that analyse the sonic fingerprints of the vocals. This includes harmonic and vibrato analysis along with linguistic examinations of the pronunciation patterns used in the vocals.

However, Bennett indicated that an audiologist might be better suited for this task since detecting the minute nuances between vocal samples often requires specialized skills.

#### Dr. George Papcún's Forensic Analysis

Dr. George Papcún, a leading forensic audiologist, was then engaged by Vera Sova, a researcher involved in scrutinizing the Cascio tracks since 2013. Papcún's extensive background in phonetics and his experience in high-profile forensic cases made him an ideal candidate for this thorough investigation.

Papcún's initial scepticism dissolved as his analysis began to align with the claims of numerous experts and fans. He meticulously examined linguistic variations, vibrato controls, and frequency patterns.

- **Linguistic Consistency**: Papcún analyzed specific pronunciations known as glottal stops—the way a speaker or singer drops the T sound in phrases like "waiting" or "wanting." He found that the vocalist on the Cascio tracks consistently used glottal stops, a feature absent in Michael Jackson's extensive discography. This inconsistency suggested that the vocalist was not Michael.

- **Vibrato Analysis**: The vibrato's speed and control were critically analysed. Papcún noted variations in pitch rate, tremolo, and harmonicity. Unlike Michael's meticulously controlled vibrato, the Cascio tracks exhibited a faster, less consistent vibrato. This deviation in vocal characteristics further bolstered the hypothesis that the vocals could be those of another singer, possibly Jason Malachi.

Combining these methods, Papcún produced objective, replicable results that consistently indicated discrepancies between the Cascio tracks and Michael's authenticated vocals.

### Spectral and Waveform Analysis

Waveform analysis and spectral imaging allow experts to visually compare the sonic fingerprints of different recordings. Despite claims from Sony and the estate about using waveform analyses, they provided neither methodologies nor findings for public scrutiny.

#### Sample Authentication

Significant evidence emerged regarding the use of samples from Michael Jackson's previous songs in the Cascio tracks:

- **"Rock With You" in "Monster"**: Detailed examination revealed identical waveforms and spectral alignments, indicating that parts of the song "Rock With You" had been spliced into "Monster."

- **"You Rock My World" in "Breaking News"**: A similar analysis showed that the baseline from "You Rock My World" was used in "Breaking News." This identical sonic profile suggested direct sampling.

These instances of sampling extend beyond mere vocal ad-libs, covering entire phrases and individual words to create new lyrics, further questioning the integrity of the lead vocals.

### The Role of Stuart Brawley

Stuart Brawley, a recording and mixing engineer, was hired by Eddie Cascio and James Porte to finalize the tracks. Brawley's access to isolated vocals from sessions of Michael's "Invincible" album potentially enabled the insertion of authentic Michael Jackson ad-libs into the new tracks, deceiving listeners into accepting the entire track as genuine.

### Summary of Findings

Dr. Papcún's comprehensive forensic analysis, supported by Professor Joe Bennett's peer review, found the following:

1. **Linguistic Analysis**: The use of a glottal stop was inconsistent with Michael's known vocal patterns but consistent with those of Jason Malachi.

2. **Vibrato Analysis**: The vibrato in the Cascio tracks differed significantly from Michael's, showing higher speed and less control.

3. **Sampling Evidence**: Multiple instances of sampled vocals from Michael Jackson's older songs showed that portions of the Cascio tracks were constructed using authentic snippets spliced to form new lyrics.

4. **Waveform Inconsistencies**: Spectrogram and waveform analyses consistently indicated that the vocals did not match the sonic profile of Michael Jackson's verified recordings.

### Conclusion

Despite assertions from the estate and Sony, forensic evidence supports fans and experts' claims that the vocals on the Cascio tracks likely do not belong to Michael Jackson. Instead, they exhibit characteristics consistent with another singer, possibly Jason Malachi. The revelations in forensic audiology and musicology underscore the necessity of transparency and rigor in authentication processes. The mystery surrounding the Cascio tracks serves as a cautionary tale of the complexities and responsibilities inherent in posthumous releases.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 12 – Witness Intimidation ]

Episode 12 – Witness Intimidation

When fans spoke out against the Cascio tracks in late 2010 and early 2011, the powers that be behind the scenes tried to silence them. In this episode we hear about the extraordinary lengths that Sony and the Estate went to in an effort to control the narrative, and how two fans found themselves on the wrong side of the law amidst their quest for the truth.

## The Controversy Surrounding the Michael Jackson Cascio Tracks

In recent years, the world of Michael Jackson fandom has been embroiled in a heated debate over the authenticity of a set of tracks known as the Cascio tracks. These tracks, consisting of 12 songs, were allegedly recorded in Eddie Cascio's basement in 2007 and sold to Michael Jackson's Estate and Sony. However, the release of these tracks on the posthumous Michael album in 2010 sparked immediate outrage among fans and Jackson's family, who claimed the vocals were fake. This article delves into the depths of this controversy, exploring the events that transpired and the extraordinary lengths to which Sony, the Estate, and those connected to the Cascio tracks went to silence dissenting voices.

### Initial Reactions and Outrage

The controversy began following the death of Michael Jackson, when Eddie Cascio and James Porte sold a collection of 12 songs, known as the Cascio tracks, to Michael's Estate and Sony. Once three of these tracks—"Breaking News", "Keep Your Head Up", and "Monster"—were included in the Michael album, the outcry began. Michael's family and thousands of fans insisted that the vocals on these tracks were not Jackson's, but were actually performed by a soundalike singer. Estate attorney Howard Weitzman released a statement asserting that several of Michael's former collaborators had confirmed the authenticity of the vocals, yet some of these collaborators later disputed Weitzman's claims, insisting that they did not believe the vocals were Michael's.

### Fan Community's Response

The fan community reacted strongly to the release of the Cascio tracks. Online forums and fan sites, such as Maximum Jackson, became hotbeds of debate and outrage. Mani, a long-time Jackson fanatic and contributor to Maximum Jackson, recounted how a significant majority of fans instantly rejected the tracks as fraudulent. The emotions ran high, and the community faced attempts by the Estate and the MJ Online Team (a group hired to liaise with fans) to steer conversations in a more positive direction, often through subtle manipulation and stern requests to close critical discussion threads.

Mani and fellow Maximum Jackson co-founder Greg Spinks described receiving numerous emails from the Estate, requesting them to suppress certain opinions and shut down threads criticizing the Cascio tracks. This created a tense atmosphere, with fans feeling pressured to conform to an approved narrative, despite their genuine belief that the tracks were fake.

### Voices of Dissent: Challenges and Suppression

Among the vocal opponents of the tracks were dedicated fans like Dan Via Lobos, who sought answers directly from the Estate. Dan attempted to communicate with estate co-executive John Branca but was redirected to Jeff Jampole, the head of the MJ Online Team. Jampole expressed concern that public dissent over the Cascio tracks was damaging Michael Jackson's legacy and urged the fan community to maintain a more unified and positive front.

Jeff Jampole's management philosophy revolves around being "authentic and credible," yet his efforts to clamp down on discussions questioning the authenticity of the tracks contradicted this principle. He suggested that dissenting voices could deter new fans from joining the community, prioritizing the brand and legacy over addressing the legitimate concerns of longstanding fans.

### Extreme Measures: The Case of Mack and James

Two fans, Mack and James, became central figures in the fight against the alleged fraud of the Cascio tracks. Upon hearing "Breaking News," Mack instantly recognized the voice of another singer, Jason Malachi, sparking his determination to expose the truth. Mack and James discovered that two other fans had obtained the unreleased Cascio tracks from Sony's secure file transfer system, and they too accessed the server to gather evidence.

Their actions drew the attention and ire of Sony and the Estate. Mack and James faced arrests, house raids, and severe legal consequences. The serious organized crime agency (Soca) and even the FBI got involved, treating the case as a major breach of cybersecurity and intellectual property theft. However, the true motivation behind these actions appeared to be silencing critics of the Cascio tracks and protecting the narrative upheld by Sony and the Estate.

### The Aftermath

The consequences for Mack and James were profound. After facing charges of conspiracy to defraud Sony, and with evidence showing they had not profited from their actions, they eventually pleaded guilty to lesser charges of unauthorized access to computer material without intent. This plea deal resulted in suspended prison sentences and community service. Their ordeal left Mack feeling mentally and emotionally destroyed, highlighting the drastic measures taken by powerful entities to protect their interests at the expense of individual fans.

### Conclusion: A Call for Authenticity and Integrity

The controversy over the Cascio tracks underscores the importance of authenticity in managing the legacy of an iconic artist like Michael Jackson. The fan community's unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth, despite facing significant opposition and intimidation, serves as a testament to their dedication and love for Jackson's genuine artistry. The actions taken by Sony and the Estate not only alienated loyal fans but also raised critical questions about the integrity of those who hold the power to shape and control an artist's posthumous legacy.

The saga of the Cascio tracks is a stark reminder that truth and transparency should never be sacrificed for profit or convenience. As fans and guardians of cultural icons, it is our collective responsibility to ensure that the legacies of artists like Michael Jackson remain untainted and are honoured with the respect and authenticity they deserve.

[/tab]

[tab=Episode 13 – The Confession]

Episode 13 – The Confession

In the gripping finale of Faking Michael, the remaining pieces of the puzzle fall into place—including the biggest smoking gun of the entire series, as the actual vocalist on the Cascio tracks, Jason Malachi, offers to come clean in the middle of an explosive fraud lawsuit.

## The Controversy Surrounding the Michael Jackson Cascio Tracks

In recent years, the world of Michael Jackson fandom has been embroiled in a heated debate over the authenticity of a set of tracks known as the Cascio tracks. These tracks, consisting of 12 songs, were allegedly recorded in Eddie Cascio's basement in 2007 and sold to Michael Jackson's Estate and Sony. However, the release of these tracks on the posthumous Michael album in 2010 sparked immediate outrage among fans and Jackson's family, who claimed the vocals were fake. This article delves into the depths of this controversy, exploring the events that transpired and the extraordinary lengths to which Sony, the Estate, and those connected to the Cascio tracks went to silence dissenting voices.

### Initial Reactions and Outrage

The controversy began following the death of Michael Jackson, when Eddie Cascio and James Porte sold a collection of 12 songs, known as the Cascio tracks, to Michael's Estate and Sony. Once three of these tracks—"Breaking News", "Keep Your Head Up", and "Monster"—were included in the Michael album, the outcry began. Michael's family and thousands of fans insisted that the vocals on these tracks were not Jackson's, but were actually performed by a soundalike singer. Estate attorney Howard Weitzman released a statement asserting that several of Michael's former collaborators had confirmed the authenticity of the vocals, yet some of these collaborators later disputed Weitzman's claims, insisting that they did not believe the vocals were Michael's.

### Fan Community's Response

The fan community reacted strongly to the release of the Cascio tracks. Online forums and fan sites, such as Maximum Jackson, became hotbeds of debate and outrage. Mani, a long-time Jackson fanatic and contributor to Maximum Jackson, recounted how a significant majority of fans instantly rejected the tracks as fraudulent. The emotions ran high, and the community faced attempts by the Estate and the MJ Online Team (a group hired to liaise with fans) to steer conversations in a more positive direction, often through subtle manipulation and stern requests to close critical discussion threads.

Mani and fellow Maximum Jackson co-founder Greg Spinks described receiving numerous emails from the Estate, requesting them to suppress certain opinions and shut down threads criticizing the Cascio tracks. This created a tense atmosphere, with fans feeling pressured to conform to an approved narrative, despite their genuine belief that the tracks were fake.

### Voices of Dissent: Challenges and Suppression

Among the vocal opponents of the tracks were dedicated fans like Dan Via Lobos, who sought answers directly from the Estate. Dan attempted to communicate with estate co-executive John Branca but was redirected to Jeff Jampole, the head of the MJ Online Team. Jampole expressed concern that public dissent over the Cascio tracks was damaging Michael Jackson's legacy and urged the fan community to maintain a more unified and positive front.

Jeff Jampole's management philosophy revolves around being "authentic and credible," yet his efforts to clamp down on discussions questioning the authenticity of the tracks contradicted this principle. He suggested that dissenting voices could deter new fans from joining the community, prioritizing the brand and legacy over addressing the legitimate concerns of longstanding fans.

### Extreme Measures: The Case of Mack and James

Two fans, Mack and James, became central figures in the fight against the alleged fraud of the Cascio tracks. Upon hearing "Breaking News," Mack instantly recognized the voice of another singer, Jason Malachi, sparking his determination to expose the truth. Mack and James discovered that two other fans had obtained the unreleased Cascio tracks from Sony's secure file transfer system, and they too accessed the server to gather evidence.

Their actions drew the attention and ire of Sony and the Estate. Mack and James faced arrests, house raids, and severe legal consequences. The serious organized crime agency (Soca) and even the FBI got involved, treating the case as a major breach of cybersecurity and intellectual property theft. However, the true motivation behind these actions appeared to be silencing critics of the Cascio tracks and protecting the narrative upheld by Sony and the Estate.

### The Aftermath

The consequences for Mack and James were profound. After facing charges of conspiracy to defraud Sony, and with evidence showing they had not profited from their actions, they eventually pleaded guilty to lesser charges of unauthorized access to computer material without intent. This plea deal resulted in suspended prison sentences and community service. Their ordeal left Mack feeling mentally and emotionally destroyed, highlighting the drastic measures taken by powerful entities to protect their interests at the expense of individual fans.

### Conclusion: A Call for Authenticity and Integrity

The controversy over the Cascio tracks underscores the importance of authenticity in managing the legacy of an iconic artist like Michael Jackson. The fan community's unwavering commitment to uncovering the truth, despite facing significant opposition and intimidation, serves as a testament to their dedication and love for Jackson's genuine artistry. The actions taken by Sony and the Estate not only alienated loyal fans but also raised critical questions about the integrity of those who hold the power to shape and control an artist's posthumous legacy.

The saga of the Cascio tracks is a stark reminder that truth and transparency should never be sacrificed for profit or convenience. As fans and guardians of cultural icons, it is our collective responsibility to ensure that the legacies of artists like Michael Jackson remain untainted and are honoured with the respect and authenticity they deserve.

[/tab]

[tab=Lawsuit against SONY (PDF)]
<a href="https://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/docs/5-s260736-apps-answer-brief-merits-100220.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/docs/5-s260736-apps-answer-brief-merits-100220.pdf</a>[/tab]

[tab=Scientific Analysis of Singing Attribution on the Michael Album (PDF)]
<a href="https://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/docs/Scientific-Analysis-of-Singing-Attribution-on-the-Michael-Album-Dr-George-Papcun-PhD.pdf " target="_blank">https://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/docs/Scientific-Analysis-of-Singing-Attribution-on-the-Michael-Album-Dr-George-Papcun-PhD.pdf </a>[/tab]
[/tabarea]

[Evie Saint]

This is fabulous! Thank you!

[~Souza~]

That has been a tremendous amount of work!

Very helpful Betty! I will read it as soon as I can!