0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginApplehead, isn't that quote from the movie Now You See Me? A great clue movie, IMO. In any case, I think Wade is helping to set something up. If Michael wants to clear his name once and for all, he may choose to revisit the matter and deal with it head on once and for all. After all, it's from TMZ! HOW? How is more allegations EVER going to clear his name?That is a good question and I can't say I have the answer. After all, Michael has outthought me at every turn so far! I'm not so sure all the PR over the last 5 years has done much to change the minds of the people who believed he was/is a pedophile. Perhaps Michael is using this story to gauge public reaction. Perhaps Wade is part of a sting operation. I really don't know. But I'm convinced Wade Robson is working under Michael's direction. And if he drew the short straw and gets to play the bad guy for the moment, so be it.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginApplehead, isn't that quote from the movie Now You See Me? A great clue movie, IMO. In any case, I think Wade is helping to set something up. If Michael wants to clear his name once and for all, he may choose to revisit the matter and deal with it head on once and for all. After all, it's from TMZ! HOW? How is more allegations EVER going to clear his name?
Applehead, isn't that quote from the movie Now You See Me? A great clue movie, IMO. In any case, I think Wade is helping to set something up. If Michael wants to clear his name once and for all, he may choose to revisit the matter and deal with it head on once and for all. After all, it's from TMZ!
Wow im seeing a lot of haters within the MJ community of so called fans lately. hmm. Wonder whos planting them?
@ it's her,....From what source do you get your information ??
No I haven't been here long, but been dedicated fan for 30+ years. I don't look at everything thru rose colored glasses. I guess I don't understand why someone who isn't "fan" would even waste their time here. I personally NEVER even visit forums or websites of people that im not a fan of. Im not a Beyoncé fan and wouldn't even waste a moment of my time commenting on anything regarding her, albeit good or bad. And I didn't necessarily mean just on this forum by my earlier post. I am seeing a lot of negativity from so called fans on facebook and twitter. Its weird to me.
@ShyBleuEyes, what are you trying to say regarding Robsons body language? Please enlighten me here. thanks
Hello It's Her,first, i want to thank you for your reply. i try to reply to you but it will be later, i have difficultys to explain what i want to say. due to language. and it will cost mtime wich i havent right now.i will add a link about wade robsons body languages, wich is imo interesting:You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginHello It's Her,first, i want to thank you for your reply. i try to reply to you but it will be later, i have difficultys to explain what i want to say. due to language. and it will cost mtime wich i havent right now.i will add a link about wade robsons body languages, wich is imo interesting:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginHi Shy, I think his body language is TOO subdued for him to be telling "his" truth or ANY other truth! :icon_e_biggrin: He has been "coached" very well---and I DO mean Hoax Coached!!! :icon_albino: Notice how he almost RECOILS from SAYing anything specifically creepy, as Matt Lauer prods him!!! It is very very very subtle...but he stays in character, bites the bullet and says JUST what M.L. said (loosely that:), "he did things to me and I did things to him". Usually grown victims are so sickened & incensed by what things they remember of the abuse, and are shockingly plain about it in order to make their audience feel AS repulsed as well. Even victims who are horrified and almost ashamed of their part (being there, submitting to it), mince NO words about what happened lest they not be taken seriously. His :icon_arrow: milli-second hesitation to give what few gory details he could on television, tells what he knows to be true in his core, that MJ never did this. It doesn't ring true at all that he believed for one second that these kinds of acts are "loving", "but let's keep it between us". He wasn't 5, he was 7-14!, he said, and even a seven year old knows if you have to hide something from your parents or friends, IT MUST BE WRONG SOME how. Even a low functioning late bloomer would have realized it before 12, even if he didn’t do anything about it. YUK! :icon_mad: It's another LIE that he only reacted inside with disgust about this happening to him when he had a son himself! Who does THAT? :icon_e_confused: :errrr:I believe WR is a big Hoaxer. Now...WHY? Not only was it verrrry interesting that he volunteered the information that these memories were not "repressed memories”, but it is MORE interesting that Lauer and the body language expert went there as if it made a difference, or they were calling out the difference, officially. People have been winning court cases with "repressed" memories for decades, and about half the people who hear about these instances believe people can peacefully live years with their abuser and not KNOW it until someone digs in their minds and finds these "memories”. Actually, (and this is very unpopular) there is no such thing; people who were traumatized enough to have lost those memories are also damaged physically (in the brain, as in car crashes or beatings), and these memories are not recoverable, no matter who digs in there. Sometimes "suggestion by therapist" memories are taken for what they are worth, evidentially, and thrown out. Maybe that's why it was drawn attention to, there. Maybe that was the most important point of the entire interview, a point of contention in his case. Maybe this court case is to establish some manner of case law on this subject (if there is none already), and stop either batty or crafty criminal professionals from turning patients into cash cows by declaring “the doctrine of repressed memories” to be fiction? But if his memories were not ever repressed, just denied, this point is not even relevant. Idk, just reaching. But three people on the vid made a point about it in the space of a few minutes! :suspect: It means something... Maybe WR only made the point of stating it so his case WON'T be thrown out as memories manufactured way after the fact. If so, he is expecting everyone to believe that these memories were on his mind AS he was covering for his abuser in right in court! Does that ever :icon_rolleyes: happen outside of some gangsters threatening your whole family if you don't testify FOR the accused? (Most victims are terrified of facing in court someone who hurt & humiliated them!) Is that what he is faking to reveal?? Nothing like this involves WR OR MJ truly. What :confused: is all this a smokescreen for, then? :Pulling_hair: