0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I just came across this on Arnold Klein's Facebook page 2hrs ago. Arnold Klein is on a roll with confirming it WASNOT Michael at the London announcement, but rather an impersonator.......Arnold W. Kleinthe problem with AEG....during the London interview this was not Michael ...look at the chin!You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginArnold W. Kleinthe impersonator had a cleft in the bottom of his chin like a tooth. When /i rebuilt Michael's face there was no cleft!!! look at the width of the impersonator's mouth.Like · · Share · 3 hours ago · 10 people like this..Lesley Anthony You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginLesley Anthony... latex MJ moulded mask Ines Parrain.. What do mean Arnold ? I mean, Michael had a chin's cleft for ages.... Look at the 2005' pictures... Anyway, there was an impersonator in TII, I agree with that.Lesley Anthony ..Arnold W. Klein can you please comment on this blog / article that claims, that you were reonstructing his face so he could get away unrecognized? You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginKlein has come out a number of times and made these claims. This is nothing new. Just Klein talking about it again and it's been picked up again by hoaxers.The alleged reconstructive surgery was in 09 getting him ready for TII - see link
...... probably due to the fact that he was slightly out of it and had to be sobered up beforehand.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login...... probably due to the fact that he was slightly out of it and had to be sobered up beforehand.Of course I don't know MJ and cannot say what he would or wouldn't do but I think I'm on pretty safe ground saying that getting yourself drunk just before you kick off the biggest production of your life and present it to the world ("... and when I say this is it, it really means this is it, because, umm ..." deep knowing laugh!), is not the behaviour one would expect from a self-proclaimed perfectionist.
Enjoying your posts guys, but nothing you've shown me says it wasn't MJ messing about all the time.Aussie's idea that 2 MJ's was about sowing seeds for a future death hoax, has been the only attempt at an answer to my 'Why?' question. (Thanks Aussie!) Seriously there needs to be a motive, and I can't see one, especially for it having started in childhood. I've had an open mind and have almost been wanting someone to come up with something indisputable - imagine the world's reaction when not only does he come back from the dead, but there's 2 of 'em! But I haven't been convinced.Katherine's book appears to have date of birth errors (Janet and Randy, but maybe it's Wiki that's wrong!), 'The Jacksons: An American Dream' as a drama can't be taken as factual, pictures can be interpreted however you want (light and perspective matter hugely, as does professional v casual pics, though they are dismissed by many). Intelius has it's limitations too for reasons I outlined before. Michael Jackson showed changes - we all do. We can all look different 'in the flesh' because of natural changes in age, weight, health, mood, expression, or cosmetic changes in hairstyles, make-up, surgery, botox etc. Then add the confusion of what may be a low quality off-the-cuff snap/vid or a professionally directed and posed photo/film, which is all we have to work with! No 'in the flesh' for us!So the question remains whether the more extreme differences people have seen were MJ himself (intentional or otherwise), or a second person, twin/brother/unrelated brought-in-for-a-job guy, or indeed just imagination on the part of the observer, brought about by the clever suggestions of a master illusionist!I suspect, like most everything else MJ related, we're simply never going to find a definitive answer to this are we?!
Quote from: Datroot...... probably due to the fact that he was slightly out of it and had to be sobered up beforehand.Nor like any behavior he ever exhibited prior so I'd say that's pretty much a salacious fabrication that I'm shocked to read here.
I don't know what you all are pretending to say, all those photos belong to the same man---> MJ, the ears, mouth, eyes, etc... seem to be different depending on perspective, I have pics where I look totally different depending on the light, position, etc.. and however I am the same person.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginQuote from: Datroot...... probably due to the fact that he was slightly out of it and had to be sobered up beforehand.Nor like any behavior he ever exhibited prior so I'd say that's pretty much a salacious fabrication that I'm shocked to read here.Do you mean MJ 'allegedly' being drunk before the Press Conference being a salacious fabrication or me mentioning it? I, of course, was referring to Randy Phillips' account of what was going on directly before the Press Conference and the reasons why he was supposedly 3 hrs late, being a possible reason for his different persona. As opposed to it not actually being MJ and a double.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginQuote from: Datroot...... probably due to the fact that he was slightly out of it and had to be sobered up beforehand.Nor like any behavior he ever exhibited prior so I'd say that's pretty much a salacious fabrication that I'm shocked to read here.Do you mean MJ 'allegedly' being drunk before the Press Conference being a salacious fabrication or me mentioning it? I, of course, was referring to Randy Phillips' account of what was going on directly before the Press Conference and the reasons why he was supposedly 3 hrs late, being a possible reason for his different persona. As opposed to it not actually being MJ and a double.Both. It's malicious slander at worst, a storyline scripted statement at best. What could make you believe that it is within the rhelm of potentially realistic possibility that MJ would show up drunk to a public appearance?