0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
This guy has $40 billion on the brain, or setup, AEG may be paying this guy. :icon_question: :ghsdf:
OR perhaps the only way to right the wrongs, to clear Michael's name, is to face this chi-mo sh*t head on. Have it make headlines again with a new "accusation" before the truth can FINALLY be known.
This here is what I'm am not understanding, why do you wait for over 20 years to come forth about a serious matter as molestation as a child. Molestation is something that should be dealt with right away. The question should be posed to this person" Why did you wait so long to come forth with this issue?" Now, as some one stated before 40 billion is a lot of money. It is pretty interesting when it comes to the trial for AEG this person shows up out of the blue. Is AEG afraid that they are going to lose the case. I do not understand this matter. A thought just popped into my head. Here is the scenario" Michael does the concert, this is the last leg of the concert, WHAM!, you have this person coming out of the blue stating that Michael abused him and he is suing Michael. I would love to know what you all think about this.Guys, I am getting a very funny feeling about this. I know that I read on a thread that was so long ago, when this forum just start about someone stating that a situation is going to come up with someone from Michael past. I think I need to do a little research.
PIERCE AERO ONEI worked for two years as an investigator with Child Protective Services. I dealt with hundreds of cases, legitimate and false. I have always had some doubts about the Michael Jackson case. Not sure, just had doubts. I'm leaning toward doubt with these claims, as well. I just don't buy it. It rings false somehow. I'm not the investigator on this case, but I didn't much trust those that handled Michael's case either. They seemed to want to Pose for the good and true, rather than actually seek it.
OR perhaps the only way to right the wrongs, to clear Michael's name, is to face this chi-mo sh*t head on. Have it make headlines again with a new "accusation" before the truth can FINALLY be known.I don't know what's going on but whatever is happening, these accusations simply aren't true and that's what I do know.
26. SHOOZIE Unless they changed the statute, someone can claim child abuse for 10 years after their 18th birthday. After that, too bad.
Comment Quote26. SHOOZIE Unless they changed the statute, someone can claim child abuse for 10 years after their 18th birthday. After that, too bad.Here Chantal Robson, his sister, defends Michael and says nothing happened.You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThis page about Joy Robson, his mother, agreeing. Also a section on Jason Francia and mother Blanca’s story ripped to pieces by Tom Mesereau.You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginHere is Wade Robson’s testimony:You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThe fact that TMZ is printing this makes me wonder if Harvey faked his love for MJ. I'm hoping it's part of MJ's plan.