NEW CHILD MOLESTATION CLAIM By Wade Robson

[Thriller4ever]

For me Wade Robson is just an actor playing the bad guy. And he's appointed by MJ. It can be felt that MJ accusing himself of molestation through Wade doesn't add up and would degrade MJ's reputation further; but going by that theory, even the very death hoax can be harmful because there can be people who'd say 'he cheated his fans' and all that.

[ShyBleuEyes]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The link does profide the official superiour Court file.

also noticed there is an "Exibit B" in the document!

[LoveNeedsExpression]

For me Wade Robson is just an actor playing the bad guy. And he's appointed by MJ. It can be felt that MJ accusing himself of molestation through Wade doesn't add up and would degrade MJ's reputation further; but going by that theory, even the very death hoax can be harmful because there can be people who'd say 'he cheated his fans' and all that.

Thats an interesting angle. I have been surprised by the reaction to this story. WAY more people have had MJs back publically, even people in the media have openly questioned Wade's motives. The support of MJ is a far cry from years ago, especially in 05 when most people (who werent MJ fans) just assumed he was guilty. I'm sure this made the haters hate even more, but there has been a lot of support of MJ. If this is hoaxy, maybe this is MJ taking the public's temperture about how he's percived or to guage the support he has before the BAM.

So maybe this is hoax related, but it did make my blood boil when this story first broke (which I believe first reported this).

[curls]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The link does profide the official superiour Court file.

also noticed there is an "Exibit B" in the document!

....... and an 'Estate of Michael Joseph Jackson!

[ShyBleuEyes]

Wade and his Sister gave theyre testimony under Oath back in 2005 while she was about 25 years old and wade was about 22 years old at that time , I have read the whole testimony, where she and Wade totally denied that MJ ever  approched or touched them in a sexual way.

Does the old testimony fall under perjury now!?, because they now claim he did molest Wade!

[MaryK]

Wade and his Sister gave theyre testimony under Oath back in 2005 while she was about 25 years old and wade was about 22 years old at that time , I have read the whole testimony, where she and Wade totally denied that MJ ever  approched or touched them in a sexual way.

Does the old testimony fall under perjury now!?, because they now claim he did molest Wade!

I´d say no, since he claims "suppressed memory".

[susieMJ]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The link does profide the official superiour Court file.

also noticed there is an "Exibit B" in the document!

....... and an 'Estate of Michael Joseph Jackson!

And the hearing date 6 - 6 -13 written on the top of the first page in a very michaelish handwritting (JMO...maybe i'm pushing it a bit too far ...). But anyway -> 6+6+13=25=7
Woohoo - is that a little clue of who's standing behind all this BS?  :icon_cool:

[MJonmind]

Any way you look at it, this is nail-biting, edge-of-your-seat thriller entertainment.  MJ: "They want escapism!"

[ShyBleuEyes]

Wade and his Sister gave theyre testimony under Oath back in 2005 while she was about 25 years old and wade was about 22 years old at that time , I have read the whole testimony, where she and Wade totally denied that MJ ever  approched or touched them in a sexual way.

Does the old testimony fall under perjury now!?, because they now claim he did molest Wade!

I´d say no, since he claims "suppressed memory".

So testimony under oath is not tying , when you still have "supressed memory" while in your twenties, he was 7 when he was at Neverland and all the other accusers and media didnt get his memory back in 2005, so what or who did get through his barrier now!

[mindseye]

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The link does profide the official superiour Court file.

also noticed there is an "Exibit B" in the document!

....... and an 'Estate of Michael Joseph Jackson!

And the hearing date 6 - 6 -13 written on the top of the first page in a very michaelish handwritting (JMO...maybe i'm pushing it a bit too far ...). But anyway -> 6+6+13=25=7
Woohoo - is that a little clue of who's standing behind all this BS?  :icon_cool:

And it's 666 with 2013. The case number adds up to 6, and may 1 is 6.

Symbol of the beast... 18 is death.  :suspect:
MJ's song Monster just came to mind.

[sweetsunsetwithMJ]

I don't understand why these new allegations would halt a Bam. Ideal opportunity to call BS I'd say, except that I don't think a Bam is imminent and I don't think MJ will alter his plans over rubbish like this. Anyway, how far down the 'justice' process can this actually go, without the alleged abuser even being around to defend himself?

Exactly, I read yesterday that a dead person can't be charged because can't defend himself furthermore after denying MJ molested under oath 8 yrs ago, makes go hmmmmmmm big time!!

I've just been reading a bit more about this, sweet. You can claim compensation from the alleged dead molester's Estate, which is what WR is doing. They're not going to just hand over the money though, there has to be evidence that the molestation actually occured.

(Not relevant to this case, very different details, but to show what is allowed legally, here's an article on the Jimmy Savile case here in the UK: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login)

Question: Can a deceased person be charged and convicted of a crime they commited ?
If a person commited a crime in this case child abuse and is now deceased and the victem wanted to pursue a conviction, is this possible now the perpertraitor is now dead?

This is for English law.

Answer:

No it is not possible, because there can be no trial, and the defendant can offer no defence. But it is possible to legally label a deceased person as a criminal - for the first time ever in English law, the inquest into the death of Lord Lucan's nanny recorded a verdict of "murdered by Lord Lucan", despite his then disappearance, and his now presumed death.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

[sweetsunsetwithMJ]

I dont know if this has already been noted, cause I only skimmed through some of the post. But why would Wade Robson feel the need to honor the man who "molested" him by perfoming in Janet's VMA tribute?    :WTF:

He claims MJ molested over 15 years ago (atleast that is number that has being thrown around), honors him at the VMAs a few months after his "death", then 4 years laters files this suit, in the midst of the AEG trial. Very interesing time table for Wade.

Right, that's what I thought too.

[bonnie2013]

Any way you look at it, this is nail-biting, edge-of-your-seat thriller entertainment.  MJ: "They want escapism!"

Something is definitely brewing... hopefully it will be in our favor.

 :bearhug:

[everlastinglove_MJ]

The timing of these allegations is so perfect that it's making me want to believe MJ set it up. I don't feel this would stop MJ's comeback. Even if it's not his setup, he'd be well prepared to tackle it.

I'm pretty sure of that! All part of MJ's plan.

When I first read about these allegations my blood was boiling...and still is (not healthy, I know), especially when I read about Robson's convenient timing caused by "repressed memories", ha!

Anyway, I have faith in MJ and his plan/set up. Truth and justice will prevail.

[sweetsunsetwithMJ]

Any way you look at it, this is nail-biting, edge-of-your-seat thriller entertainment.  MJ: "They want escapism!"

Something is definitely brewing... hopefully it will be in our favor.

 :bearhug:

Sorry bonnie: hopefully it will be in Michael's favour.