0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
@gwynned: Is that the link to your tweeter? (DeepInside777?)
I've got to give props to MJFB Marketing [...]
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI've got to give props to MJFB Marketing [...] You mean you think this is only for marketing purposes?So whomever is behind that MJ-FB page is only manipulating us into believing that this is part of Michael's hoax?That would mean you think Michael is dead?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI've got to give props to MJFB Marketing [...] You mean you think this is only for marketing purposes?So whomever is behind that MJ-FB page is only manipulating us into believing that this is part of Michael's hoax?That would mean you think Michael is dead?@SimPatty ....I love how you think, you read between the lines and see what isn't being said. :icon_mrgreen:....for the record...No, I personally do not believe Michael is dead, never did.....but I also do not believe everyone is pure of motive either.Perception$ are very personal, doesn't make them true or untrue....
[...]....for the record...No, I personally do not believe Michael is dead, never did.....but I also do not believe everyone is pure of motive either.[...]
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[...]....for the record...No, I personally do not believe Michael is dead, never did.....but I also do not believe everyone is pure of motive either.[...]Ok. But if Michael is alive, then that means he's not fully in control of his own official websites?Do you think that while he is indeed alive , someone else is messing around on his account? Someone who might take advantage of the fact that, officially, Michael is still being "dead" to the world ? and they advertise his websites to take credit and money out of them?Otherwise I don't see how nor why would there be "non-pure motives" behind all these blatant hoax-whispers that we've been receiving so far...I think Michael is well behind everything.But then again, as you said, to each, his own perception. :icon_e_wink:
Just want to say that I adore this thread. So controversial and Live too. Most of the good threads about double debate were a while ago, before my time. Its great to be able to read a live one and see peoples interpreations of the doubles down the track. Some of the longer term members, I can see (Compared with original opinions I have observed in the archived forums) have changed. This is not a critisism, just an observation. My opinion changes too all the time, with who is MJ and who is the double, regardless of 02, TII, pictures, controversial WATW appearance, etc... Is it MJ or is it a double. Or the guy who is thought was the double really MJ? Is that a bad MJ double? Or is that MJ playing the role of a double? Or the role of a bad MJ double.... (Ok roll me up and send me to the nut house!!)I guess what it essentially means is that regardless of who is right or wrong in this forum about which pic / video / appearance is REALLY the GENUINE MJ, then, MJ did his job. He has succeeded as not only the greatest entertainer / musician / dancer / pioneer of pop culture change - he is enigmatic, mysterious, magical. We are still talking about photographs of him from the 80's and 90's. Job well done MJ.Would just like to point out how amazingly LUCKY we are to live in the same generation to experience MJ as an entertainer!!
RK December 25, 2012, 03:11:48 AM ยปJust read that Spike Lee has posted two pics on his instagram of MJ from TDRCAU. Same stony faced look.