0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
QuoteA brother can be a friendPaula do you mean? You think that if a twin brother? A twin brother?, noooo, :icon_lol: at times when there is a great friendship between the people, they can refer to that friend as a brother or sister
A brother can be a friendPaula do you mean? You think that if a twin brother?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginMJonmind, your theory about a possible twin COULD explain the quote on the This Is It-album: ' Always great to sing with my brother'. I always found it very weird, like: Which brother do you mean Mike?? You have five of them! The twin-theory goes beyond my imagination, but hey this whole hoax does!For the record, in my previous post, I was concluding that I do NOT think MJ had a twin, or look-alike brother. I think it's all MJ, with myriad changes applied--make-up, photo-shop, age, weight, lighting, surgery, etc.
MJonmind, your theory about a possible twin COULD explain the quote on the This Is It-album: ' Always great to sing with my brother'. I always found it very weird, like: Which brother do you mean Mike?? You have five of them! The twin-theory goes beyond my imagination, but hey this whole hoax does!
There was a period of time when I was considering the possibility of Michael having a twin brother. I was fascinated by Flem's videos on Youtube...But in time, I realized it can't be true.And while I don't believe in the twin-theory, I DO believe that Michael used plenty of doubles/impersonators all these years. And God knows he needed that! for all the reasons in the world!!The doubles/impersonators would explain Flem's discovery of possibly 3 Michael(s) in the Bashit interview ("Living with Michael Jackson") :icon_lol: Even though this video maker was using those evident differences in the Michael(s) shown in that interview in order to prove her twin-theory, I think it was impersonators that we saw. At one point in that interview, even the dumbo-Bashit noticed this and said something to the effect of: "It was not the same Michael Jackson I had met few months ago" loll :icon_lol:Michael is the biggest hoaxer/prankster ever!!! He tricked us all! and played the hardest tricks on the media! Well done!! Smooth "Criminal" :michael-jackson:---> You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginPS: the TMZ title "Stone faced" ... makes me think of Stone Henge...especially after reading that site about the galactic alignment posted by @TouchedByAnAngel ( You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login )
BTW, this comment from Bashit (!) convinces me he was in on this and was reading from a script. He can't not have known that this impersonator was not Michael. On screen, we could be fooled, but not someone who saw him day in and day out. Nothing is ever as it seems, is it?
[...]Michael is the biggest hoaxer/prankster ever!!! He tricked us all! and played the hardest tricks on the media! Well done!! Smooth "Criminal" :michael-jackson:[...]
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login[...]Michael is the biggest hoaxer/prankster ever!!! He tricked us all! and played the hardest tricks on the media! Well done!! Smooth "Criminal" :michael-jackson:[...] :thjajaja121: I love you Michael :bearhug:---> You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I do not exclude potential identity theft from the list of motivations for a crime or for the hoax.
Elvis Presley, The Beatles top list of most-forged autographsBy Eric KelseyLOS ANGELES | Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:41pm EST(Reuters) - Elvis Presley and The Beatles top the list of most-forged celebrity signatures in 2012, with less than half of their autographs for sale certified as genuine, memorabilia authenticators PSA/DNA said on Thursday.The King and The Fab Four British rockers, who topped the list two years ago when it was last released, joined notable figures such as former U.S. President John F. Kennedy and late pop star Michael Jackson on the list of most-forged celebrity signatures.Late American astronaut Neil Armstrong landed at No. 3 on the list, after fake Armstrong signatures rose significantly after his death in July.One reason forgeries of Armstrong's autograph soared was that he rarely signed for fans during his life, Joe Orlando, president of Newport Beach-based PSA/DNA, told Reuters."Armstrong is someone who is very conscious of the value of his own autograph," Orlando said. "Even before he passed away he was very tough to get...It really heightens the level of his market."Secretaries and assistants responding to huge volumes of fan mail are one reason for fake signatures floating through the marketplace, said Margaret Barrett, director of entertainment and music memorabilia at Heritage Auctions in Los Angeles."Back in the day, the kids would write to the movie studios," Barrett said."There was absolutely no financial gain 50 years ago and secretaries and assistants just wanted to make them happy. A lot of times people stumble upon an old box of signed photographs in grandma's attic and don't know they're forged."Barrett, whose specialty is late Hollywood actress Marilyn Monroe's autographs, said that official documents such as contracts and checks are reliable sources to verify whether or not a signature is forged."A good rule of thumb is to compare it a signed contract," she said. "Sometimes (celebrities) would have secretaries or other sign photos and letters but they couldn't have a contract signed by a proxy."(Reporting by Eric Kelsey, editing by Piya Sinha-Roy and Cynthia Osterman)
"A good rule of thumb is to compare it a signed contract," she said. "Sometimes (celebrities) would have secretaries or other sign photos and letters but they couldn't have a contract signed by a proxy."
THE RIDDLERLike any truly inspiring teacher who wants to impact his students, Michael's methods in molding our creative process were inconspicous. One of his most ingenious moves was to pose cryptic questions, sending us on a wild goose chase to solve riddles. We could tell he thought it was humorous to puzzle us. Andf in a sense, this mindbending game was one of the best ways we learned from Michael. Only we didn't know it at the time.Michael Bush, The King of Style, p 19.This quote intrigues me no end.....Hmmmm. wonder why? :screaming-7365: :omg: :LolLolLolLol:Titania
At one point in that interview, even the dumbo-Bashit noticed this and said something to the effect of: "It was not the same Michael Jackson I had met few months ago"
* AEG's letter of intent made believe to look like a contract and * different MJ signatures.I don't think forging signatures is only a matter for making money in auctions. The bigger fish is insurance and contract fraud.What if this was exactly the case that "could not happen"?Quote"A good rule of thumb is to compare it a signed contract," she said. "Sometimes (celebrities) would have secretaries or other sign photos and letters but they couldn't have a contract signed by a proxy."
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginTHE RIDDLERLike any truly inspiring teacher who wants to impact his students, Michael's methods in molding our creative process were inconspicous. One of his most ingenious moves was to pose cryptic questions, sending us on a wild goose chase to solve riddles. We could tell he thought it was humorous to puzzle us. Andf in a sense, this mindbending game was one of the best ways we learned from Michael. Only we didn't know it at the time.Michael Bush, The King of Style, p 19.This quote intrigues me no end.....Hmmmm. wonder why? :screaming-7365: :omg: :LolLolLolLol:Titania :omg: I can't believe it!Okay, that does it. I am absolutely convinced that Front and TS are one and the same.I know he said he was not MJ, but I think when he lies, he does it for hoax purposes. He's said many times, he wants us not to just go by his words, but by the evidence. Well the evidence is loud and clear to me.Do, we’re good , :beerchug: :bearhug:Sim, IMO, these are all Michael. But he is definitely doing deliberate things to give the impression of doubles.Notice difference hair-lines, eyebrows darker/lighter, beard/shaven, different usage of eye and lip make-up, weight gain/loss, lighting, etc. He also tries to act differently in personality. I think he's in total hoax modus operandi. And what you said:QuoteAt one point in that interview, even the dumbo-Bashit noticed this and said something to the effect of: "It was not the same Michael Jackson I had met few months ago"Sometimes I think Bashir's in, but mostly I think MJ had him totally and genuinely baffled. Just think how he's baffled millions of his fans who think they've followed him forever, and know everything (think he's dead). In the second pic of him in the green shirt, look what's going on with his hair pushed back revealing is it shaved skin or hair make-up. It's downright :icon_lol: :icon_eek: :icon_e_confused: :icon_razz:
I give up, I guess it's too much out of the box for people. I tried 3 years ago and got the same responses. I see two different MJ's, it's not only obvious in pictures and videos, but in many lyrics as well. Just as the signatures on the AEG contract, the LA / NYC mystery and so much more. I don't believe either of them died BTW, so that to me is not a problem. We'll see.
