Blog

[Love4Michael]

So why the hell are we able to see his will online ???

Only two real possibilities if the records are sealed...a) it bogus or b) somebody pocketed $ for revealing it.

[Andrea]

I thought there was a "no contest" clause in the will.  Because I remember Katherine had to be very careful how she did things regarding the will back in 2009.

[suspicious mind]

I thought there was a "no contest" clause in the will.  Because I remember Katherine had to be very careful how she did things regarding the will back in 2009.

i seem to remember something of the kind also
:Michael_Jackson_dancing_smile

[marumjj]

2good2btrue went to the link you posted and there is much information I did not know, thanks for posting.
Also I thought that was not available on line.

[suspicious mind]

@sweetsunset, you're joking, right? We don't 'deserve' anything. We are just the audience!

However, coming out and saying his real name is Michael Joe Jackson would open up the floodgates to questioning all the other wrongly named documents. Bring it on, I say ... but the time is probably not right yet!

unless somehow he was using both names , or someone was and it wasn't quite legal ( i really don't know how but i thought i would propose it) they might not want to come right out and make an issue of it. idk tired brain  :icon_e_confused: :icon_cry:

[blankie]

The will of Michael Jackson is invalid because it does not state his true birth name in it which is Michael Joe Jackson. Anyways, I hope the will situation gets worked out between the siblings and the estate executors.

Why  the brothers did not finish saying this? :suspect:

They will, they can't leave us with incomplete information we deserve to be informed by them.

This will also tell us.....every day we hear  news.....  :icon_razz:

[kdkennedy74]

Just a thought here, but is it possible that even though there is proof that MJ was New York when the will was signed, that the executors maybe faxed or e-mailed a copy to an attorney in NY who printed it out and MJ signed it there and then the signed will was returned to the executors, therefore making the date of the signature a non issue?  I am just thinking that so many attorneys have contacts in other states that maybe it could have been done in this manner and then overnighted back to California.

I am probably just grasping at a way to justify this and make it all legit.  IDK.

if that was the explanation wouldn't their be some way for the lawyers to just come out and say that and prove it? besides did i read somewhere that these same people who are executors were the witnesses? that has to be all wrong if it is the case, doesn't it?

You are very right. I wasn't thinking fully...I was grasping for a reasonable explanation.  This whole WILL thing makes me dizzy sometimes!!! :Pulling_hair: