0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The will is obviously important. We're hearing about it (again) over 3 years later from Jackson family members themselves. One of the most obvious signs for me that the will is fake, or a hoax prop (besides the 7 numerology), is the use of "Joseph" as Michael's middle name. I'll have to take a closer look at the document again, when I have more time to focus properly on it.You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThe will is obviously important. We're hearing about it (again) over 3 years later from Jackson family members themselves. One of the most obvious signs for me that the will is fake, or a hoax prop (besides the 7 numerology), is the use of "Joseph" as Michael's middle name. I'll have to take a closer look at the document again, when I have more time to focus properly on it.You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginSince spending time on the forum comparing Front's handwritten notes with Michael's writing samples, I'm thinking... this is not MJ's signature, and signed 5pm in Los Angeles when he wasn't there. Fake will was planned.
Unless Branca is a part of the hoax, it almost seems like a snub for Branca to have signed the will on the very date that Michael was putting it to Sony. Surely the astute businessman that Branca is KNEW what that date represented. It feels like he’s saying to Michael the jokes not on Sony, but on you, because we are all powerful. So rather than July 7, 2002 being remembered for the day that he read Sony and did good business, it will go down in history as the day Branca did.From a different point of view it could be seen as showing how much clout public opinion has in that we KNOW that Michael was in Harlem during this time period, and now everyone else does; but if the public isn’t completely outraged by it in huge numbers, even the courts will turn their eyes as if they don’t see the fraud that was committed. And that is exactly what happened to Michael during all those years he was ostracized and torn apart in the media. That the public basically turned their backs on Michael allowed the media to have a field day with nothing done about it. The same would have probably happened in the 2005 trials if we had not stood up and made some noise and brought global attention to it. Even though Michael was innocent, without the support of people who were willing to rally for him and make a fuss, there’s no telling what would have happened. The courts can be bought and they will work only as hard as they have to. If it is found that the public is “okay” with Branca presenting a will that is obviously a fraud, nothing will happen to change it. Nothing.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginUnless Branca is a part of the hoax, it almost seems like a snub for Branca to have signed the will on the very date that Michael was putting it to Sony. Surely the astute businessman that Branca is KNEW what that date represented. It feels like he’s saying to Michael the jokes not on Sony, but on you, because we are all powerful. So rather than July 7, 2002 being remembered for the day that he read Sony and did good business, it will go down in history as the day Branca did.From a different point of view it could be seen as showing how much clout public opinion has in that we KNOW that Michael was in Harlem during this time period, and now everyone else does; but if the public isn’t completely outraged by it in huge numbers, even the courts will turn their eyes as if they don’t see the fraud that was committed. And that is exactly what happened to Michael during all those years he was ostracized and torn apart in the media. That the public basically turned their backs on Michael allowed the media to have a field day with nothing done about it. The same would have probably happened in the 2005 trials if we had not stood up and made some noise and brought global attention to it. Even though Michael was innocent, without the support of people who were willing to rally for him and make a fuss, there’s no telling what would have happened. The courts can be bought and they will work only as hard as they have to. If it is found that the public is “okay” with Branca presenting a will that is obviously a fraud, nothing will happen to change it. Nothing.I get what you're saying but I think the point of having the "will" "signed" that day was to create the 7/7 then 7 years later the Memorial on 7/7. The NY/LA debate should tell people that something fishy is going on and make them notice the "coincidence". And those paying attention did notice. It's an indicator of the hoax and it's planning, almost sort of in your face.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginUnless Branca is a part of the hoax, it almost seems like a snub for Branca to have signed the will on the very date that Michael was putting it to Sony. Surely the astute businessman that Branca is KNEW what that date represented. It feels like he’s saying to Michael the jokes not on Sony, but on you, because we are all powerful. So rather than July 7, 2002 being remembered for the day that he read Sony and did good business, it will go down in history as the day Branca did.From a different point of view it could be seen as showing how much clout public opinion has in that we KNOW that Michael was in Harlem during this time period, and now everyone else does; but if the public isn’t completely outraged by it in huge numbers, even the courts will turn their eyes as if they don’t see the fraud that was committed. And that is exactly what happened to Michael during all those years he was ostracized and torn apart in the media. That the public basically turned their backs on Michael allowed the media to have a field day with nothing done about it. The same would have probably happened in the 2005 trials if we had not stood up and made some noise and brought global attention to it. Even though Michael was innocent, without the support of people who were willing to rally for him and make a fuss, there’s no telling what would have happened. The courts can be bought and they will work only as hard as they have to. If it is found that the public is “okay” with Branca presenting a will that is obviously a fraud, nothing will happen to change it. Nothing.I get what you're saying but I think the point of having the "will" "signed" that day was to create the 7/7 then 7 years later the Memorial on 7/7. The NY/LA debate should tell people that something fishy is going on and make them notice the "coincidence". And those paying attention did notice. It's an indicator of the hoax and it's planning, almost sort of in your face.I get that connection also, but there is something still to be said about the ability for a person or persons to have so much clout that no matter what else is said or done it goes unheard or in this scenario unprosecuted.