0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Journalist Diane Dimond, who is no defender of the pop icon, also attacked the Sunday People article."It is obvious the paper took this old story and proceeded to make it seem new by adding numbers to it -- 24 boys paid off $35 million by Michael Jackson," Dimond said. "The problem is there's no evidence to back up the claim that Jackson made that many payoffs."
QuoteJournalist Diane Dimond, who is no defender of the pop icon, also attacked the Sunday People article."It is obvious the paper took this old story and proceeded to make it seem new by adding numbers to it -- 24 boys paid off $35 million by Michael Jackson," Dimond said. "The problem is there's no evidence to back up the claim that Jackson made that many payoffs."I cannot believe that she said this¡ ¡, :icon_eek: and then as be all of the above said by Diane :icon_question:
"Dimond said. "The problem is there's no evidence to back up the claim that Jackson made that many payoffs."Well that is the truth, and "the truth prevails!"Stay blessed!OnTheWingsOfLove
Waste of tax payer money and public resources for court time. MJ could pay the bills but the time lost is forever. Wouldn't look good.
I think the trial is staged/ a live theater production. I think it's all been approved prior to go.