It’s Joe Jackson - nuff said

[MJonmind]

So,  is she never going to wash herself there again?  If it was MJ's sig, I'd probably get it tatooed right away (It would be my first tattoo!) :lol:
Remember this thread PureLove?  I remember seeing your lovely tatoo!  http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/smf2.0/index.php?topic=16691.25

SimPattyK

Like for example this:
'Kony 2012' Honcho Jason Russell Detained for Allegedly Masturbating in Public
http://www.tmz.com/2012/03/16/kony-honcho-arrested-for-allegedly-masturbating-in-public/

Well that explains why we never see the mom again after giving birth in the Kony video. He wants 9 more? suspicious//
Unless...someone's trying to destroy him and set him up. Nah....  Being drunk or drugged just brings out your real self--I think...

or this:
Rampage Jackson Grants Fan Request -- Yes, I'll SLAP You in the FACE!!!
http://www.tmz.com/2012/03/16/rampage-jackson-slap-fan/

The pain fetish guy says something about, "up in Neverland".
Simpa, where do you find these?

Applehead

I think they're just doing the E.T. finger touch.  But with the camera angle it sure appears to be a forbidden touch! ::P
I'd love to touch fingers with MJ!  This would be my finger afterward:

.Bye bye Naked,welcome Dressed

Never fear Applehead.  Then here's the very church for you!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7D-Xg6i4Bw

[applehead250609]

Delete

[MJonmind]

Gina,

Michael has his genes jeans. And that's enough for me to like Joe...sort of...

So long GP! :lol:

[GINAFELICIA]

Gina,

Michael has his genes jeans. And that's enough for me to like Joe...sort of...

So long GP! :lol:

I swear this time I didn't think for a second at jeans, gold pants, black leather pants or any other MJ pants that drive me crazy sometIMEs LOL!
The genes are important and I am grateful to Joe he "contributed" at least that much to bring to life a wonderful person like Michael.

[SimPattyK]

LMFAO  :lol: :lol: Gina & MJonMind  :lol: :lol: Girls you just crack me up with your coms & pics!!

@MJonMind: you asked me where I take the links from? Well I try me best to follow TMZ almost daily on twitter and whatever title that attracts my attention in a "hoaxy-way", I click on the link and read between the lines!
I also 'circulate' a lot on the Internet, on other forums, too, on facebook, on twitter, I Google every key-word that comes up in a day ...so... I keep an eye open all the time..

[Its her]

May be I come from a different world! But I still believe that there are certain things that should not be exposed!

I know that world! It is nearly just a memory.  :-\ Certain things are referred to as "Private areas", because ---they are PRIVATE. Adam and Eve discovered that they were naked in their PRIVATE garden, only after their privacy was eventually trespassed and violated by that lying serpent, the devil, and they believed him over the truth spoken by God.

It does not matter if you are naked Privately. It DOES matter if you go public with it, out of context. An individual can swing their arms like a maniac all day, as long as they are alone. Once other people share the space, it becomes a hostile & offensive act and violates the others' quiet enjoyment of the space.

I have a nude painting and sculpture in my personal space, at home. Some nude bodies are so beautiful, they are inspirational. The big difference between tasteful and creepy, is the consideration of others; walking in Love.

Paintings of nude models are respectful private affairs, and usually, we don't personally know the models. We are not "uncovering their nakedness", as the Bible says (em-BARE-ASSing them :?), which used to be a sin in Noah's day. (Hath sin passed away???? afraid/ ) Mostly, the artist is preserving a form of anonymous beauty which many people fail to preserve and maintain in real life, after only a few years. Art stops Time, and feeds the soul in a way looking in the mirror never will again. In a museum or private home, this art is in a perfectly respectful context, offending no one. There are no undressed real actual souls in the room being ogled or intimidated by the clothed ones. I mean, how creepy would it be if the painting of Whistler's Mother was a nude? (Not because of the nudity, but because of knowing her name and "knowing" her,  OMG! exposed. I personally would be embarrassed to hang it, even though she is long dead. JMO.  :lol: errrr)

Now, there are people who love to expose themselves, and find "acceptable" outlets for this bent, in order to keep from being arrested (because it IS against the law, no matter how people try to rationalize it). Topless waitresses and strippers and all that are legal in places, where there are rules about no contact between patrons and employees. Looking may be under the radar, but touching and manipulation of a paid nude are acts of sex offense, which are not legal in most states.

It's NONE of my business what Joe Jackson does. He can even make dirty movies if he wants to. (And, for all we know, the gal could have been a paid actor for some porno movie event---although...even those "ladies" are always fully clothed at their DVD signings--so even THEY get it, that there is something inherently creepy about being ogled by someone who is looking you in the... eyes,  errrr errrr errrr :-[ whatever, while you sign your movie!! Even pseudo- and seedy-Art has a REAL privacy "wall" to prevent the creepy.)

What anyone does is between them and their Judge, unless it is criminal and damaging to others. Unfortunately, being disrespectful to one's wife and family, is not against the law, it is just tacky and  :-\ unloving. I feel  :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: bad for Mr. Jackson and the fool's look on his face, getting played by the bare bosom of someone sixty years his junior.  :x I feel bad for MJ's mom...And I feel bad for anyone here, who was offended at the old guy's winter of life antics. I am just disappointed. I haven't wanted to believe anything creepy about Papa Joe, dang it!

IS THERE ANY CHANCE ON EARTH THAT THIS PHOTO IS SHOPPED :?: :?: :?: :|

Even so,

we really don't KNOW what is going on in the photo, right? If it was, say, a charity event giving zillions to a worthy cause, that would make it all peachy, right? If a young woman wants to degrade herself for a good cause, maybe coking herself up, as usual, to withstand all the lecherous looks she is sure to encounter (choosing to be employed as a live nude), patronizing the tightwads of the town into pinching out a few bucks, for charity, it is all ok, right?  Just a little situational ethics, eh? /white flag/

I don't think so.  :? The ideal is to glorify God, proceed as if He is faithful, doing all things IN HIS NAME respect/ . "Doing good and healing" NEVER involves compromise of loving or respecting one's self or others. Never.

It really is that simple, in that other world ???/.

Diggyon, you are correct. I just don't see making yourself sick about wrong. You can hold up the standard without being eaten alive by the zeal. You are not alone, at all. :)  bearhug

[SimPattyK]

SimPattyK

Like for example this:
'Kony 2012' Honcho Jason Russell Detained for Allegedly Masturbating in Public
http://www.tmz.com/2012/03/16/kony-honcho-arrested-for-allegedly-masturbating-in-public/

Well that explains why we never see the mom again after giving birth in the Kony video. He wants 9 more? suspicious//
Unless...someone's trying to destroy him and set him up. Nah....  Being drunk or drugged just brings out your real self--I think...

I also thought that he might be "set up" and discredited on purpose!

or this: Rampage Jackson Grants Fan Request -- Yes, I'll SLAP You in the FACE!!!  http://www.tmz.com/2012/03/16/rampage-jackson-slap-fan/

The pain fetish guy says something about, "up in Neverland"

I'm glad you also noticed that!! I thought I didn't hear well!! I thought I heard him say: "I'm in Neverland"
kind of strange, isn't it!?

[diggyon]

May be I come from a different world! But I still believe that there are certain things that should not be exposed!

I know that world! It is nearly just a memory.  :-\ Certain things are referred to as "Private areas", because ---they are PRIVATE. Adam and Eve discovered that they were naked in their PRIVATE garden, only after their privacy was eventually trespassed and violated by that lying serpent, the devil, and they believed him over the truth spoken by God.

It does not matter if you are naked Privately. It DOES matter if you go public with it, out of context. An individual can swing their arms like a maniac all day, as long as they are alone. Once other people share the space, it becomes a hostile & offensive act and violates the others' quiet enjoyment of the space.

I have a nude painting and sculpture in my personal space, at home. Some nude bodies are so beautiful, they are inspirational. The big difference between tasteful and creepy, is the consideration of others; walking in Love.

Paintings of nude models are respectful private affairs, and usually, we don't personally know the models. We are not "uncovering their nakedness", as the Bible says (em-BARE-ASSing them :?), which used to be a sin in Noah's day. (Hath sin passed away???? afraid/ ) Mostly, the artist is preserving a form of anonymous beauty which many people fail to preserve and maintain in real life, after only a few years. Art stops Time, and feeds the soul in a way looking in the mirror never will again. In a museum or private home, this art is in a perfectly respectful context, offending no one. There are no undressed real actual souls in the room being ogled or intimidated by the clothed ones. I mean, how creepy would it be if the painting of Whistler's Mother was a nude? (Not because of the nudity, but because of knowing her name and "knowing" her,  OMG! exposed. I personally would be embarrassed to hang it, even though she is long dead. JMO.  :lol: errrr)

Now, there are people who love to expose themselves, and find "acceptable" outlets for this bent, in order to keep from being arrested (because it IS against the law, no matter how people try to rationalize it). Topless waitresses and strippers and all that are legal in places, where there are rules about no contact between patrons and employees. Looking may be under the radar, but touching and manipulation of a paid nude are acts of sex offense, which are not legal in most states.

It's NONE of my business what Joe Jackson does. He can even make dirty movies if he wants to. (And, for all we know, the gal could have been a paid actor for some porno movie event---although...even those "ladies" are always fully clothed at their DVD signings--so even THEY get it, that there is something inherently creepy about being ogled by someone who is looking you in the... eyes,  errrr errrr errrr :-[ whatever, while you sign your movie!! Even pseudo- and seedy-Art has a REAL privacy "wall" to prevent the creepy.)

What anyone does is between them and their Judge, unless it is criminal and damaging to others. Unfortunately, being disrespectful to one's wife and family, is not against the law, it is just tacky and  :-\ unloving. I feel  :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: bad for Mr. Jackson and the fool's look on his face, getting played by the bare bosom of someone sixty years his junior.  :x I feel bad for MJ's mom...And I feel bad for anyone here, who was offended at the old guy's winter of life antics. I am just disappointed. I haven't wanted to believe anything creepy about Papa Joe, dang it!

IS THERE ANY CHANCE ON EARTH THAT THIS PHOTO IS SHOPPED :?: :?: :?: :|

Even so,

we really don't KNOW what is going on in the photo, right? If it was, say, a charity event giving zillions to a worthy cause, that would make it all peachy, right? If a young woman wants to degrade herself for a good cause, maybe coking herself up, as usual, to withstand all the lecherous looks she is sure to encounter (choosing to be employed as a live nude), patronizing the tightwads of the town into pinching out a few bucks, for charity, it is all ok, right?  Just a little situational ethics, eh? /white flag/

I don't think so.  :? The ideal is to glorify God, proceed as if He is faithful, doing all things IN HIS NAME respect/ . "Doing good and healing" NEVER involves compromise of loving or respecting one's self or others. Never.

It really is that simple, in that other world ???/.

Diggyon, you are correct. I just don't see making yourself sick about wrong. You can hold up the standard without being eaten alive by the zeal. You are not alone, at all. :)  bearhug

Thank you so much! Because I thought for a while that I was alone with that opinion of mine!!!!

[hesouttamylife]

Oh well...  beerchug  I give up because as Michael said...

moonwalk_/    moonwalk_/    moonwalk_/    moonwalk_/