0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 30, 2010, 10:33:29 PM
Don't you find it interesting that after the press conference that there was talk whether that was really Michael?  And, Michael wasn't even gone yet!

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Something didn’t seem quite right. There was that impossibly square chin, for a start – a bizarre cosmetic enhancement, even for Michael Jackson.

Then there was the voice, several octaves lower than the dog-whistle whisper the King of Pop normally adopts in front of his adoring fans.

Study the walk as well – a slightly hunched gait you might not expect from someone who ranks among the world’s most spectacular dance performers.


  ...  Naturally, the official response is that it was Jacko. But they would say that, wouldn’t they? Others are speculating that – for whatever reason – it was merely a convincing impersonator.

    The internet is buzzing with suggestions that the MJ the world saw during a four-minute appearance at O2 might not have been the MJ fans know and love.

    Ludicrous conjecture? Well, maybe so. But like many internet-based rumours, this one is beginning to snowball.

Telegraph:

    AEG Live, which organised the star’s programme starting in July, said the company is “still negotiating” with insurers, but insisted it is willing to take on the risk of Jackson falling ill.


I have a question - why would AEG be so willing to take a risk on Jackson's failing health?  Randy Phillips has made it clear that AEG is a business and is out to make money, not lose it. Sounds like a huge risk...unless there was another plan in the works :)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
I'm proud to be a child of God and a member of MJ's Army of L.O.V.E.
 
"Press coverage of my life is like [watching] a fictitious movie...like watching science fiction. It's not true." ~Michael Jackson (2005)

"You should not believe everything you read. You are missing the most important revelations". Craig Harvey 3-15-2012

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 30, 2010, 10:53:29 PM
I think both of those photos are MJ.  I think MJ sometimes wore like special make up or maybe even like latex or something to fix some of the damaged area around his nose .  I think the pic on the right he is more natural with less makeup.  I also think his lips are fuller on the left.  I know I look different when I wear makeup too.  Maybe he did something different to his face on purpose to make people question if that was really him or not.  Remember he is the master of disguise. :)   When he was speaking it sounded like him to me at the conference although I did notice a difference in his walk.  When he walked in he was walking totally different than he normally does.  Like he had a new swagger/confidence about himself. My brother and I was like dang MJ walking like he's a pimp.  So that's what I feel.  Just a suggestion.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 31, 2010, 10:00:16 AM
Please tell me, who is that behind the curtain?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
February 02, 2010, 11:55:53 AM
Quote from: "Christiana"
They are both Michael to me. When a person smiles, the "gaps" between their nose and lips will be different. Angle of head and photo are different as well.

I think MJ would laugh if he read all these comparisons of photos of him with people saying it's not him when it really is.  :lol:
Agreed.  :D  :D
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

je

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
February 02, 2010, 07:02:24 PM
idk how many MJ's were at the 02 arena in march but what i see are several
photos that appear to be different

first off the nose is looks squared
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

this photo below the nose has a pointed tip
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

ok what's wrong with the hand here? idk
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

on the left side of the face below the glasses there appears to be an discolored area
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

these 2 photos appear different..the hair is different on the left side over the writing of
the glasses.there is more space on the lighter photo...
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

just an observation...all pics came from mjjpictures.com
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
March 19, 2010, 12:14:40 PM
Quote from: "bluegurl201"
Quote from: "Christiana"
They are both Michael to me. When a person smiles, the "gaps" between their nose and lips will be different. Angle of head and photo are different as well.

I think MJ would laugh if he read all these comparisons of photos of him with people saying it's not him when it really is.  :lol:
Agreed.  :D  :D

Ditto!!!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Speechless, Speechless, That\'s how you make me feel!!!
I Love You now and forever Michael

the arabian nights

  • Guest
Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
March 19, 2010, 12:23:40 PM
my view both are michael
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
March 19, 2010, 12:40:06 PM
one thing ive learned about all this is that michael can look totally different from every angle  :lol:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


[size=150]All the truth in the world adds up to one big lie.
-Bob Dylan[/size]

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
March 19, 2010, 12:50:28 PM
Quote from: "wendst6"
Please tell me, who is that behind the curtain?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

OMG! The man behind the curtain......certainly looks like Michael.Incredible find!
 :o

P.S. look at the detailing at the shoulder area of the black shirt. There is a difference between them in the Michael pics.


.............why would there be a need for a camera to be concealed from behind the stage curtain? This certainly is in keeping with Liberian girl and Michael being behind the scenes (or curtain, for that matter as often implied since June 25)

I wonder:
Was this a Michael Jackson look-alike try-out? Was AEG looking for someone to play MJ's part???? Could that be why this staged Michael was so nervous???
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Michael Supporter
Be the change you wish to see in the world.
~Mahatma Gandhi

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
April 08, 2010, 05:11:50 PM
I don't know what to think about the O2 press conferance....All I know is that a had a strange feeling the first time I saw it...something seemed wrong to me and it still does...Something odd and bizarre about Michael and the whole situation,but I still don't know what this is... :?
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
17 Replies
1422 Views
Last post February 22, 2010, 03:18:35 AM
by Lizziebee
24 Replies
2350 Views
Last post November 19, 2010, 02:01:49 PM
by trustno1
11 Replies
923 Views
Last post March 31, 2010, 06:07:31 PM
by Stranger In Chi-town
0 Replies
1016 Views
Last post April 10, 2010, 05:10:09 PM
by the arabian nights
0 Replies
382 Views
Last post April 25, 2010, 06:10:24 AM
by 2good2btrue

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal