0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
December 25, 2009, 08:44:24 PM
Ive been debating with myself if Michael was the real Michael at the pressconference and some days I think its him other times I dont. One thing is for certain, the Michael to the right is in my opinion 100% him and the MJ from the pressconference/backstage pics to left is NOT the real Michael.

I will tell you why. I know its hard to tell whether or not its him, but what finally convinces me is the gap between his nose and upper lip. The gap is shorter on MJ-left than MJ-right. And MJ-left has a shorter jaw too and the real MJ-right has a longer jaw.

MJ-left also has a rounder and smaller face in my opinion. The gap between nose-upperlip and gap between lower lip-jaw tells me this is NOT Michael.

Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


JUST BECAUSE YOU READ IT IN THE MAGASINE OR SEE IT ON THE TV-SCREEN DONT MAKE IT FACTUAL.

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
December 25, 2009, 08:50:41 PM
Both pix r of him. On the right one he has a lil bigger lip, thats why the gap looks smaller.

K.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
The day I will stop loving you, is the day when I close my eyes forever!


*

larab

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
December 25, 2009, 09:00:06 PM
the lighting is completely different on each picture. both michael.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
December 26, 2009, 10:16:26 AM
agree, not the same person... as for the lips, even you put some fillers or collagen or whatever, it does not dissapear overnight and these photos supposedly were taken day by day ???
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
December 26, 2009, 10:18:33 AM
No, of course, is both Michael
The light from the camera angle can be deceiving
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
December 26, 2009, 10:22:20 AM
Different angles.. the pic on the left has MJ tipping his face downwards slighlty whereas the pic on the right is a more full-on direct face picture.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Always the Angel on My Shoulder

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
December 26, 2009, 10:23:12 AM
Both Michael. The angle of the camera and the lighting are different. Also in one he's smiling and in the other one not.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
December 26, 2009, 02:13:24 PM
They are both Michael to me. When a person smiles, the "gaps" between their nose and lips will be different. Angle of head and photo are different as well.

I think MJ would laugh if he read all these comparisons of photos of him with people saying it's not him when it really is.  :lol:
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.  ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

(Translation = Just because I might disagree with you does not mean I\'m attacking you.)

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 28, 2010, 01:06:08 PM
I can't really tell because both pictures look like Mi ka eel and at the London conference did anybody else catch his closing remarks 'See You in the Lie', can anyone clarify if he actually said that. Maybe it was a lookalike because if that was Mi ka eel, then, why would he put his fist up to say 'so what, and,  what are you gonna do about it', yes I read all that in the Michael Jackson's look-alike's body language or Mi ka eel's body language. I could be wrong.
Last Edit: February 02, 2010, 02:00:18 AM by essenceofebony0to9
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
o

*

Kirsche

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 28, 2010, 01:16:52 PM
For me, they're both Michael...

Also because I'm not sure if he would send a double to the Conference which is/ or could be the announcement of the hoax...

When i saw him there standing and his words " I love you, I really do, You have to know that...." I was sure it was Michael...Because, like some others and me said in another topic he sounded so ruefull...like he knew what's gonna happen...
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
[
OKAY, EVERBODY! THAT\'S A WRAP!

*

MJJ1982

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 29, 2010, 12:17:23 PM
2 times Michael.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
\'Just because it\'s in print, doesn\'t mean it\'s the gospel\'

\'A star can never die. It just turns into a smile and melts back into the cosmic music, the Dance of Life\'
You\'re just another part of me... I love YOU more...

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 30, 2010, 08:32:29 AM
The left one? Not Michael.
The right one? Michael.
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 30, 2010, 09:31:27 AM
thoses pics are michael no doubt about it. next!!
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 30, 2010, 10:59:25 AM
The Picture are different. But have a look of this. Is this a same person?


You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

superflysister81

  • Guest
Re: Two MJ's. Two Pics from London.
January 30, 2010, 11:17:51 AM
In my opinion, if we want to discover wether it's Michael or not, we have to focus on :

-teeth
-hands


They don't lie.  8-)
Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

Related Topics

  Subject / Started by Replies Last post
17 Replies
1422 Views
Last post February 22, 2010, 03:18:35 AM
by Lizziebee
24 Replies
2350 Views
Last post November 19, 2010, 02:01:49 PM
by trustno1
11 Replies
923 Views
Last post March 31, 2010, 06:07:31 PM
by Stranger In Chi-town
0 Replies
1016 Views
Last post April 10, 2010, 05:10:09 PM
by the arabian nights
0 Replies
382 Views
Last post April 25, 2010, 06:10:24 AM
by 2good2btrue

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal