0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It seems the Jackson family finally decided it wasn't worth the time or the energy to battle for scraps.
No reason was given for the decision, and TheWrap's request for comment from the family's lawyer has not yet been answered
If you ant to read what the non-believers think - here's the link:You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login bangbangThey are sure furious about the Jackson family...
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI may well be off base here, BUT! Since WHEN does a CRIMINAL court take financial restitution matters in consideration? Their purpose has been served with the "verdict" and any subsequent appeals. It is a CIVIC court which would look at a new trial with a more lenient "burden of proof" to award damages......So what was this about anyway? suspicious//I thought that was odd as well, but I have too little knowledge of the US legal system so it might as well be normal. I mean it's America, you can sue McDonalds if your coffee is hot and you can't seem to drink it without spilling it, so I mean...
I may well be off base here, BUT! Since WHEN does a CRIMINAL court take financial restitution matters in consideration? Their purpose has been served with the "verdict" and any subsequent appeals. It is a CIVIC court which would look at a new trial with a more lenient "burden of proof" to award damages......So what was this about anyway? suspicious//
I just wish people would do some research before posting here about what WOULD and would NOT happen if you're not in the U.S.No, Murray would NOT be "forced to sell his assets". He can have assets and the family can go after them IF they win a CIVIL judgment.YES, criminal courts deal with restitution every day....but it's based on what income the person has--not ASSETS. They pay fines and restitution in cash.Please, everyone, not EVERYTHING is part of a hoax. Some things make perfect sense in all this IF it were a real criminal case.
Does anyone really believe that Murray is in jail? I don't. Just a gut feeling.
Well, if this turns out to be factual, guess Joe won’t be getting a dime either.lYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Loginlatimes.comState Bar of California recommends lawyer's disbarmentBy Stuart Pfeifer, Los Angeles TimesJanuary 19, 2012advertisementThe State Bar of California has recommended that attorney Brian Oxman, whose high-profile client list has included pop star Michael Jackson and the 1-800-GET-THIN surgery marketing company, be disbarred for several violations of bar rules.In a Jan. 13 order, the State Bar Court said Oxman should lose the ability to practice law because of dishonest and unethical conduct, including failing to advise the bar after he had been fined by a judge and commingling personal funds in a client trust account.Under the order, Oxman will become inactive Feb. 2, pending a final ruling by the state Supreme Court. It typically takes several months for the Supreme Court to issue a final ruling.Oxman did not respond to a request for comment.In its order, the bar cited Oxman's two past disciplinary cases as evidence that he should face the maximum penalty."Oxman's three disciplinary proceedings show a disturbing disregard for the administration of justice, including misrepresentations to courts and a failure to cooperate in disciplinary proceedings," the order said.As a result, the bar said, "We recommend that Oxman be disbarred to protect the public, the courts and the legal profession."Oxman has made numerous appearances on television as a legal expert. He was part of the defense team during Jackson's 2005 sexual molestation trial. Most recently, he has represented the 1-800-GET-THIN marketing company and its affiliated Lap-Band surgery centers. Last month, he represented the companies during a hearing before the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors.On Tuesday, Oxman was named as a defendant in a whistle-blower lawsuit filed against 1-800-GET-THIN by former workers at the surgery centers. Among other things, the lawsuit accused Oxman of attempting to bribe a surgeon to sign a statement that would falsely accuse an opposing lawyer in a wrongful-death lawsuit of ethical violations. The wrongful-death lawsuit had been filed by relatives of a woman who died following Lap-Band surgery at a clinic in West Hills.stuart.pfeifer@latimes.comCopyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times
Let's say Murray really killed Michael and he really was broke, then STILL you would do anything in your power as a family to make his life miserable by letting him hand over every penny he can each and every month for the rest of his life. But instead the famly decides to make a nice gesture and Murray doesn't have to pay a dime. LMAO!
wasnt he also earning 150K a month with MJ.