Hello to all! And thanks for welcoming :)
Yeah, that's exactly what I found strange in this description! She should wrote would have been, not will be!
I mean, my native language is Serbian, but I can see the difference between would have been and will be! Her native language is English and she is talking abut Michael in future tense "will be" not in past as - it would be possible if he is alive. I found that she is totally correct when it comes to grammar. She perfectly knows the difference between past and future tense.
Could it be that she made mistake? I mean, they all know about hoax theory, shouldn't she be more careful then if she want us not to think that the hoax theory is true?
Ps. I didn't pay the attention to the picture itself.