0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
1. I highly doubt that TS is only playing with us right now! There's no tIME left for games and for "lessons" now!
[...] What happened happened, what will be will be. My thoughts, and those of anyone else here, make not one jot of difference in the great scheme of things.
We don't know what Michael's beliefs are in regards to this and he is possibly a very liberal thinker...more so than alot of people might believe. People can still be very spiritual and religious and still be very liberal in their beliefs/ideas and thinking..
"Someone had to die."
There are people here who supported the dead body theory or the DWD theory, why didn't he ask them to lay out their reasons?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login12 Evidences for DWDNow for a dozen evidences in support of the DWD theory. This is merely a review, so I won’t be repeating much of the details (they can be found in previous posts by me and/or others). And please pay attention to the difference between the reasons for the FBI choosing to use a DWD patient (which we may not fully understand), and the evidences that a real DWD patient was actually used (which we should all be able to understand).#1 Confusion of appearance (both with the real MJ, and also with the DWD patient); there would be no need for confusion of appearance, if a good MJ look-alike dummy was used, or live MJ.#2 The 3-5-09 WA DWD. If we dismiss this as merely a koinkidink, then why not dismiss all the other hoax koinkidinks? Besides, this is not “stand alone” evidence—it is evidence which fits perfectly into all the other points listed here.#3 Two “unknown” WA DWD death locations in 2009 (never any other “unknown” in WA, and no “unknown” in OR for the first 13 years).#4 TIAI redirected to the TMZ home page, shortly before the TMZ article that MJ killed himself (on 4-4 at 4am, 2010); and DWD patients must “ingest the medication unassisted”—they must kill themselves.#5 Paramedics said that it looked like a hospice patient (about 80% to 90% of DWD deaths were also hospice patients). Whether they are all in on the hoax, or not, there has been no good explanation for why they would lie about this.#6 The warm room on a summer day in California seems unnecessary, if it was a dummy or live MJ.#7 Nobody was allowed upstairs in the Carolwood home. A dummy could be kept in a locked case, until the “emergency” began; aside from a few seconds to take the dummy out of the case, and place it on the bed, there would never be any problem if someone not in the hoax went upstairs. The live MJ theory would also need little if any secrecy upstairs.#8 Reports from MJ fans that there was a lot of extra security at Carolwood on the night of June 24/25, 2009. This would be when the DWD patient was brought into the home (and also explains a reason for the missing CCTV). Like #7 above, a locked up dummy or live MJ would not need all that extra security.#9 The staff was dismissed, before bringing the body down to the ambulance (stated by Kai and Ben); this would not be needed, if there was a dummy that looked just like MJ in 2009 or live MJ.#10 The towel on the face (another precaution, in addition to dismissing the staff); again, this would not be needed, if there was a dummy or live MJ. This also provides another reason for staging the ambo pic in advance; if it was a dummy or live MJ, they could’ve arranged things to “accidentally” let Ben or Chris get a shot of loading MJ into the ambulance, or something. But if it was a DWD patient, a picture taken in real time would not work.#11 Sharon said that the body on the stretcher was too short for MJ. A dummy would be made to match the size of MJ, and would not be too short; and live MJ certainly would not be too short. We can try to minimize this evidence, by saying that Sharon did not have a good perspective of the patient on the stretcher, or Sharon is not a reliable witness, or whatever. However, with the DWD theory, you don’t have to come up with any such explanations—you can simply take it at face value, the patient looked shorter than Michael because the patient WAS shorter than Michael. Simple.#12 The verdict: “Superior court of California Los Angeles County. The people of the state of California plaintiff versus Conrad Robert Murray defendant. Case number SA-073164. Title of court and cause. We the jury in the above entitled action find the defendant Conrad Robert Murray guilty of the crime of involuntary manslaughter. In violation of penal code section 192 subsection B alleged victim Michael Joseph Jackson alleged date of June 25th 2009 as charged in count I of the information.” The charge stated in context is “involuntary manslaughter”—not suicide, or assisted suicide; so even if the DWD patient method was illegal in CA, yet the patient would not be an actual victim of manslaughter (he would be an “alleged victim”). And especially with the FBI sting making the DWD method legal in CA, there is certainly no legal basis for the patient being an actual victim of manslaughter.We may not be able to positively verify all 12 of these points (such as the towel on the face); however, as I said already, we should take things at “face” value—unless there is good evidence that someone is lying. And in this case, all 12 evidences support the same simple conclusion; no need for any fancy back-flips, or complicated explanations. {see You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}I am not listing the following as one of the twelve evidences, but La Toya did give a very clear clue less than ten minutes after TS first posted the DWD evidence: “What is everyone doing with the left overs?” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}And clear back in March of 2010 (Update #4), TS said: “… Or there was a real human corpse, which had recently died.” Notice that I did not mention a corpse in cold storage for a long time; and DWD fits exactly with a patient who had “recently died.”If all of this is merely the result of MJ trying to create an illusion, that it was a DWD patient—when in reality it was a dummy or live MJ—what would be the purpose? Can someone with an active imagination come up with a far-fetched explanation, for this slight possibility? No doubt. However, can anyone come up with solid evidence to support this idea—which is based neither upon imagination, nor upon far-fetched explanations? Not likely.Oh, and one last very important point: almost all of these 12 evidences support the hoax theory, and do not support the literal murder theory.I rest my case. :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley:Well, as I've always thought they've used a corpse, I prefer to take your words at face value TS.edit: if I am wrong, so be it.
12 Evidences for DWDNow for a dozen evidences in support of the DWD theory. This is merely a review, so I won’t be repeating much of the details (they can be found in previous posts by me and/or others). And please pay attention to the difference between the reasons for the FBI choosing to use a DWD patient (which we may not fully understand), and the evidences that a real DWD patient was actually used (which we should all be able to understand).#1 Confusion of appearance (both with the real MJ, and also with the DWD patient); there would be no need for confusion of appearance, if a good MJ look-alike dummy was used, or live MJ.#2 The 3-5-09 WA DWD. If we dismiss this as merely a koinkidink, then why not dismiss all the other hoax koinkidinks? Besides, this is not “stand alone” evidence—it is evidence which fits perfectly into all the other points listed here.#3 Two “unknown” WA DWD death locations in 2009 (never any other “unknown” in WA, and no “unknown” in OR for the first 13 years).#4 TIAI redirected to the TMZ home page, shortly before the TMZ article that MJ killed himself (on 4-4 at 4am, 2010); and DWD patients must “ingest the medication unassisted”—they must kill themselves.#5 Paramedics said that it looked like a hospice patient (about 80% to 90% of DWD deaths were also hospice patients). Whether they are all in on the hoax, or not, there has been no good explanation for why they would lie about this.#6 The warm room on a summer day in California seems unnecessary, if it was a dummy or live MJ.#7 Nobody was allowed upstairs in the Carolwood home. A dummy could be kept in a locked case, until the “emergency” began; aside from a few seconds to take the dummy out of the case, and place it on the bed, there would never be any problem if someone not in the hoax went upstairs. The live MJ theory would also need little if any secrecy upstairs.#8 Reports from MJ fans that there was a lot of extra security at Carolwood on the night of June 24/25, 2009. This would be when the DWD patient was brought into the home (and also explains a reason for the missing CCTV). Like #7 above, a locked up dummy or live MJ would not need all that extra security.#9 The staff was dismissed, before bringing the body down to the ambulance (stated by Kai and Ben); this would not be needed, if there was a dummy that looked just like MJ in 2009 or live MJ.#10 The towel on the face (another precaution, in addition to dismissing the staff); again, this would not be needed, if there was a dummy or live MJ. This also provides another reason for staging the ambo pic in advance; if it was a dummy or live MJ, they could’ve arranged things to “accidentally” let Ben or Chris get a shot of loading MJ into the ambulance, or something. But if it was a DWD patient, a picture taken in real time would not work.#11 Sharon said that the body on the stretcher was too short for MJ. A dummy would be made to match the size of MJ, and would not be too short; and live MJ certainly would not be too short. We can try to minimize this evidence, by saying that Sharon did not have a good perspective of the patient on the stretcher, or Sharon is not a reliable witness, or whatever. However, with the DWD theory, you don’t have to come up with any such explanations—you can simply take it at face value, the patient looked shorter than Michael because the patient WAS shorter than Michael. Simple.#12 The verdict: “Superior court of California Los Angeles County. The people of the state of California plaintiff versus Conrad Robert Murray defendant. Case number SA-073164. Title of court and cause. We the jury in the above entitled action find the defendant Conrad Robert Murray guilty of the crime of involuntary manslaughter. In violation of penal code section 192 subsection B alleged victim Michael Joseph Jackson alleged date of June 25th 2009 as charged in count I of the information.” The charge stated in context is “involuntary manslaughter”—not suicide, or assisted suicide; so even if the DWD patient method was illegal in CA, yet the patient would not be an actual victim of manslaughter (he would be an “alleged victim”). And especially with the FBI sting making the DWD method legal in CA, there is certainly no legal basis for the patient being an actual victim of manslaughter.We may not be able to positively verify all 12 of these points (such as the towel on the face); however, as I said already, we should take things at “face” value—unless there is good evidence that someone is lying. And in this case, all 12 evidences support the same simple conclusion; no need for any fancy back-flips, or complicated explanations. {see You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}I am not listing the following as one of the twelve evidences, but La Toya did give a very clear clue less than ten minutes after TS first posted the DWD evidence: “What is everyone doing with the left overs?” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}And clear back in March of 2010 (Update #4), TS said: “… Or there was a real human corpse, which had recently died.” Notice that I did not mention a corpse in cold storage for a long time; and DWD fits exactly with a patient who had “recently died.”If all of this is merely the result of MJ trying to create an illusion, that it was a DWD patient—when in reality it was a dummy or live MJ—what would be the purpose? Can someone with an active imagination come up with a far-fetched explanation, for this slight possibility? No doubt. However, can anyone come up with solid evidence to support this idea—which is based neither upon imagination, nor upon far-fetched explanations? Not likely.Oh, and one last very important point: almost all of these 12 evidences support the hoax theory, and do not support the literal murder theory.I rest my case. :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley: :judge-smiley:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login@BTC .... So I don't see how questioning TS is undermining him or anyone supporting a different viewpoint, I find that much is learned from debate, for both 'sides'. I never said that questioning TS is undermining him....he, himself, has always told us to do so. We should question everything...my point was that we should not only question if info is false, but also if it's true. Sure, there's always the possibility that he's 'misleading' us...but if that's the only reason to doubt the theory, then the doubt is NOT based on the info but instead on the one providing it. It's the info that should be questioned, IMO, not the messenger....and not with personal opinions but rather with evidence that contradicts the info provided.Perhaps I just see things differently because to me this was never about a 'debate' or about being on one 'side' or another....I saw it as working together, as a team, to try to figure out as best we could, all we could. With L.O.V.E. always.I see it as working together as well, debating various theories is a part of that or else we would've all agreed on a theory years ago. Not everyone is going to see things the same or take something at face value, and that's not suggesting you are, that's just the way it is. The fact that TS might be misleading us is not my only reason for doubting the DWD theory. Some of the evidence is shaky at best but same with some evidences for the live MJ/dummy theory. My point was it can go either way and I do question everything, especially lately. And you're right, you didn't say questioning TS is undermining him, I didn't word what I read correctly. I just haven't seen anything undeniable yet. A vague FBI involvement to answer the unexplainable details doesn't sit right, curls is right about it being a sort of cop-out clause so that's one reason why I question some of the evidence TS (and others) have presented. I will accept whatever happened that day, I just hope one day we'll know. You know what I mean?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login@BTC .... So I don't see how questioning TS is undermining him or anyone supporting a different viewpoint, I find that much is learned from debate, for both 'sides'. I never said that questioning TS is undermining him....he, himself, has always told us to do so. We should question everything...my point was that we should not only question if info is false, but also if it's true. Sure, there's always the possibility that he's 'misleading' us...but if that's the only reason to doubt the theory, then the doubt is NOT based on the info but instead on the one providing it. It's the info that should be questioned, IMO, not the messenger....and not with personal opinions but rather with evidence that contradicts the info provided.Perhaps I just see things differently because to me this was never about a 'debate' or about being on one 'side' or another....I saw it as working together, as a team, to try to figure out as best we could, all we could. With L.O.V.E. always.
@BTC .... So I don't see how questioning TS is undermining him or anyone supporting a different viewpoint, I find that much is learned from debate, for both 'sides'.
First of all, THANK YOU TS, for posting...At this point DWD does make sense as the main barrier, that is 'legalities' has been cleared. So the essence of your post is...- a dwd patient used.- FBI actively involved in the sting.- A sting not just an artistic one, involves serious criminal investigation.- FBI and MJ shared their responsibilities in setting up this hoax.---------TS:Quote However, in some case, it’s true that I actually do not know for sure what happened; I said very early, that I don’t know everything about the hoax. And in this case, I do not know exactly what the FBI agents told the DWD patient—nor does MJ himself know, for that matter. And most likely, the FBI is not going to disclose those kind of details to anyone.If the FBI did 'say' anything to the DWD patient (which would probably relate to the hoax/sting, i guess), wouldn't that again violate CA law? Because the FBI is actually talking with this patient regarding the hoax/sting.Another point which i have raised earlier, some pages ago.It's not guaranteed (at this point) that these DWD patients are Michael fans or admirers who would 'willingly' want to assist in the hoax, and be of a great help/significance in helping MJ and FBI in accomplishing their mission.This DWD patient might also be any other guy, believing the media lies on Michael. ok If not Michael, why would the patient want to assist the FBI in carrying out their mission.As it is not stated anywhere that the patient willingly agreed to be a part of the hoax, it gives room for the speculation that FBI might have convinced this patient to co-operate with them...This can violate the CA Law, as they would be providing 'advice'.
However, in some case, it’s true that I actually do not know for sure what happened; I said very early, that I don’t know everything about the hoax. And in this case, I do not know exactly what the FBI agents told the DWD patient—nor does MJ himself know, for that matter. And most likely, the FBI is not going to disclose those kind of details to anyone.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login1. I highly doubt that TS is only playing with us right now! There's no tIME left for games and for "lessons" now!@Sim, one could argue that this is the ideal time to 'play' with us - to cause the very disturbance that is now apparent .... before the climax! Can't be having us all quietly sitting here drumming our fingers! But I'm not going to labour the point! What happened happened, what will be will be. My thoughts, and those of anyone else here, make not one jot of difference in the great scheme of things.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login And in the very unlikely chance that both patients backed out simultaneously, when there was not enough time left to bring in a third DWD patient, a dummy could still be used with no greater risk than what many on this thread already think is a very low risk method.If a dummy could be used with no greater risk, why not use one? I don't understand. If TS_comments doesn't agree with "many on this thread", then why did he use this 3rd option as support for the DWD patient? So then he does agree with "many on this thread" that using a dummy carries no greater risk then using a DWD patient; if the DWD patients back out they'll just use a dummy, no problem?
And in the very unlikely chance that both patients backed out simultaneously, when there was not enough time left to bring in a third DWD patient, a dummy could still be used with no greater risk than what many on this thread already think is a very low risk method.
Answers were given by TS with its arguments. Using a patient DWD, is simple and applicable to the hoax, and in fact, we "challenges" to present solid evidence against this theory. If there already have been filed, or not?The debate continues, and if TS can be misleading or not, I do not know, that might only be that the theory of using a patient DWD, does not fit the image we have of MJ, or religious beliefs or simply not agree.We may never know our power was truly like desarrolo of deception, but even if the FBI was the executor. For my theory is accepted from the beginning, and TS says I rest my case. :bearhug:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginFirst of all, THANK YOU TS, for posting...At this point DWD does make sense as the main barrier, that is 'legalities' has been cleared. So the essence of your post is...- a dwd patient used.- FBI actively involved in the sting.- A sting not just an artistic one, involves serious criminal investigation.- FBI and MJ shared their responsibilities in setting up this hoax.---------TS:Quote However, in some case, it’s true that I actually do not know for sure what happened; I said very early, that I don’t know everything about the hoax. And in this case, I do not know exactly what the FBI agents told the DWD patient—nor does MJ himself know, for that matter. And most likely, the FBI is not going to disclose those kind of details to anyone.If the FBI did 'say' anything to the DWD patient (which would probably relate to the hoax/sting, i guess), wouldn't that again violate CA law? Because the FBI is actually talking with this patient regarding the hoax/sting.Another point which i have raised earlier, some pages ago.It's not guaranteed (at this point) that these DWD patients are Michael fans or admirers who would 'willingly' want to assist in the hoax, and be of a great help/significance in helping MJ and FBI in accomplishing their mission.This DWD patient might also be any other guy, believing the media lies on Michael. ok If not Michael, why would the patient want to assist the FBI in carrying out their mission.As it is not stated anywhere that the patient willingly agreed to be a part of the hoax, it gives room for the speculation that FBI might have convinced this patient to co-operate with them...This can violate the CA Law, as they would be providing 'advice'.could anyone answer this for me....i posted this couple of days ago...