TIAI November 11 (11-11-11)

Started by TS_comments, November 11, 2011, 03:11:15 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

TS_commentsTopic starter

Quote from: bec on November 25, 2011, 10:07:05 PM

But like Andrea said, I don't agree that by itself means the Live MJ theory is debunked.

Agreed; I am just taking it one step at a time; the first step was to debunk the sitting up theory, that's all.
Quote from: bec on November 25, 2011, 10:07:05 PM

Each option is fraught with risk so I don't think you can use "risk" as supportive evidence against anything."

Yes, each option has some degree of risk.  But which one has the LEAST risk?

Im_convincedmjalive

Quote from: TS_comments on November 25, 2011, 02:34:11 AM

Here we are now, at level 7b.   :geek:

We have only a few days left (until 11-29), but 7b and 7c should fall into place rather quickly—especially since I will be handing much of it out on a silver platter.

In 7a, we have debunked the multiple ambulance theories; and have shown that the ambulance videos were both taken at the same time on 6-25-09.  Discussion on that subject is now closed on this thread, unless you have read all the previous posts on this thread and have something NEW to contribute; even then, you MUST fulfill ALL THREE of the conditions outlined already (and if you don't know what they are, it's because you have not read everything yet).  If you go ahead and post without fulfilling these conditions, then expect that your post will be deleted.  This is in the interest of keeping on topic; and to avoid cluttering this thread by going over the same ground again and again, merely for the sake of those who are too lazy to read what has already been thoroughly debunked.

One of the clearest ways to know when a theory has been irrefutably debunked, is when those who are still trying to defend the debunked theory have no EVIDENCE left to support the theory—and so they resort to any and all tactics OTHER than evidence, such as insinuating bad motives, or claims of secret evidence which can't be shared, etc (notice that I have ALWAYS used evidence which is readily available on the internet).  And these things have already showed up here in 7a, therefore anyone who REALLY wants the truth (and is not merely CLAIMING to want the truth) may know that all the video-taped ambulance events did occur at Carolwood on June 25, 2009.

It is important that we understand 7a correctly, because it's a solid foundation upon which we can build to find the answer for the main question in 7b (what went to the hospital in the ambulance?).  For example, since the video events really happened on 6-25-09, we need to start thinking about all the people who were already at the residence (before any LAFD arrived)—were they ALL in on it?  If so, why?  And if not, what would keep them from finding out (and spilling the beans)?

Remember this statement, which I made at the beginning of this thread: "Start with the fewest people possible in on it, which would actually be zero and no hoax (MJ really died); and then work backwards from that point—changing nothing from the no hoax scenario, except what is NEEDED to be changed in order to accomplish the hoax."

For example, do you think that Kai Chase was in on it?  If so, why?  Would she NEED to be in on it, and what EVIDENCE is there that she is in on it?  In fact, have you ever considered whether the CHILDREN were in on it initially (or just informed afterward)?  And again, what EVIDENCE do you have on this?

Some have claimed that MJ would or would not do things a certain way, merely because it does or does not fit his habits or personality.  For example, some say he would love to be in the middle of the action; and he is a prankster, therefore that fits with him riding to UCLA, sitting up in the stretcher, riding the helicopter, hopping out of the van, etc.

Although the above is correct in a general sense, it is not correct in relation to this hoax.  Please notice the following, from TII (also in the puzzle above): "LIKE YOU'VE NEVER SEEN HIM BEFORE"!  This alone should tell us that the TII production is DIFFERENT from what we would normally expect out of MJ.  The hoax is the biggest and most important production of his life; and he would not risk having it all ruined, merely so that he could have some fun riding around town in an ambulance, helicopter, and van.

Far more important than the fun, is the SUCCESS of the project.  If the first attempt failed, there would not be another opportunity ever again.  The timing and numerology would never be as good again; and worse than that, the public would be expecting it the second time—so everyone would question his "death" on a second attempt.  And speaking of success, notice this statement about The Illusionist: "... the masterful illusion that has been so SUCCESSFULLY planned & implemented." {http://tinyurl.com/cc5bzx6}.  So let's be looking for a coherent theory, where SUCCESS is of utmost importance.

To make it as easy as possible, I'm going to go through a process of elimination here in 7b.  I am going to start by showing that MJ did not go to the hospital in the ambulance (in fact, I have already started this process, in those last two paragraphs above); then I will go through other possibilities, one at a time (living double, nobody, dummy, corpse).  And for each step in the process, I will be using at least two or three different strong points—which is a very good principle to use in all cases, not just this hoax investigation.

As we go through and continue to debunk some of these long-cherished hoax theories (NONE of which have EVER been supported by yours truly): no doubt it will cause some to fear that MJ really died, and there is no hoax (and this could be the reason for some of the resistance displayed in 7a).  It is true, as Jesus said, that those who build their faith upon the sand will have their house collapse when a storm comes through (see Matthew 7:24-27).

Nevertheless, those who have built their faith on solid theories (such as the numerology, with a $999 reward that nobody has even attempted to collect after more than a year) will not be troubled over the collapse of the long-cherished but faulty hoax theories.  Quite the contrary, the true how's of the hoax will become quite clear; and then it will be even more obvious that it's a hoax (not murder, or accidental manslaughter, etc).

And finally, once the how's of the hoax become clear, then the why's of the hoax will become even clearer than before.  Understanding the why's is very important—not only before BAM, but especially after.  And if people who come to this forum after the BAM can see that we have a good solid coherent theory on the how's, then they will be much more likely to believe that we also have the correct understanding of the why's.

Hello TS-

I am working on 1 part of your suggestions. The bolded and enlarged part is what I will be focusing on for right now. I am starting with the least people in on it (0) and MJ dead, only changing what needs to be in order to pull off the hoax. In my theory the only 2 people who needed to be in on it (at the house) for this to work (in this phase) would be Murray and Alvarez. I wrote about Alberto here: http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/smf2.0/index.php?topic=21319.msg373008#msg373008

Every other person at the house before the LAFD showed up didn't need to have a direct role (at that time) for the Illusion to be successful. I will talk about that in another comment.

I am adding videos of LAFD/Paramedic Senneff. He is stating what happened that day when he worked on Mr. Jackson. He is describing what he did and his fellow co-workers did that day. There is alot of info in the videos that will answer many questions that are being brought up in the last few pages. Heron that you spoke about in your other comment is a LAFD/Paramedic. He is described as the one who did the CPR on Mr. Jackson while in the room at the house. Everyone who arrived at the house from LAFD did their job as they would for any other patient. The only thing I am changing now is substituting a corpse/cadaver for alive MJ.

Blount intubated the corpse/cadaver and Senneff says it is difficult to intubate (he doesn't say if it is difficult on a dead or alive person) just that it is difficult. Maybe for him it is but, for Blount it was a breeze and Senneff was surprised. Some people have natural talent in areas that others do not.

Senneff says there was no heart activity on his machine that he hooked up to Mr. Jackson. That makes sense since the patient is already dead. No surprise there. There was no pulse on the patient and Murray just said that in order to move to the next phase of the hoax--the hospital.

IMO the 2 DR's who testified are not in on it. Cooper wanted to pronounce MJ dead based off of what Senneff told the nurse and the nurse relayed the info to her. Cooper never even saw MJ before she decided to call time of death. At Murray's urging the Paramedics decided to keep going in their efforts to save MJ. At the hospital it was Murray who urged the DR.'s to keep going and it is my belief that he finally said at the correct hoax time of death (2:26) ok you can call it. I have wrote about my theory regarding Murray being the influence on Cooper to call time of death in another thread. I have limited what I have wrote before to save time. I will post those at another time. typing/


scorpionchik

Quote from: ~Souza~ on November 27, 2011, 07:47:28 PM

Quote from: scorpionchik on November 27, 2011, 07:30:35 PM

Quote from: bec on November 27, 2011, 07:26:20 PM

@scorpionchick, that's why I say you don't understand the numerology... because you don't understand it.

I'm sure MJ would like to hear your correct principle of numerology.

Instead of be sure that I "don't understand" IT , can you explain what is the principle of numerology then. I demonstrated it, what is your understandiing of numerology? Maybe there are different types of usage I am not aware of?
Indeed MJ would.
a. The 911 call was in the first few seconds of 12:21
b. 12:21 to 2:26 is 2 hours and 5 minutes on June 25; 2 + 5 = 7
c. 1,221 + 226 = 1447; 1 + 4 + 4 + 7 = 16; 1 + 6 = 7
d. Memorial 7th day of 7th month, 7 years after will (and full moon)
e. 77 days from "death" to 9-9-09
f. 7 days from "burial" to 9-9-09 (and almost full moon)
g. THIS IS IT vowels = 999
h. HIS (HIStory and THIS IS IT) backwards = 1998
i. 1998 autograph; 1998 - 666 = 1332 / 4 = 333 + 666 = 999
j. 777 + 999 = 1776
k. All of these numbers (333, 666, 777, 999, 1221, 1776, 1998) are divisible by 111
l. 8 + 16 + 1977 = 2001; 6 + 25 + 2009 = 2040 (space intros for Elvis and MJ)

http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/tiai_update_6_5.php

Certainly different type of numerology from what I know. Thank you Souza.

@Bec, I won't bother reading TS as detailed as you do.  Sooner or later everything will be clear anyway.
BTW, as much as I read TS posts, I found many incosistencies.

EndlesslovetoMJ

TS_commentsTopic starter

Quote from: scorpionchik on November 27, 2011, 11:14:42 PM

BTW, as much as I read TS posts, I found many incosistencies.

Could you give one or two examples?

MANY people have tried to debunk what I have said, and so far EVERYONE who has attempted has failed.  So if you can do it, you would be the very first one in more than two years of failed attempts!


Grace

November 27, 2011, 11:24:17 PM #1249 Last Edit: November 27, 2011, 11:30:09 PM by Grace
Quote from: PureLove on November 27, 2011, 08:49:46 PM

Quote from: Andrea on November 27, 2011, 07:28:20 PM

I agree with Souza that the "nothing" argument should be done now, going with what is seen in that photo still.

Agree with you guys. At least we could debunk the "nothing went to UCLA" theory.
I said "nothing" in comparison with a corpse or a dummy.
I said "inflatable doll" could have done it as well (since it is strapped on the stretcher) under the right preconditions that we don't know.

In the light of "murder attempt" it does not make any sense at all that Michael himself went into lion's hell, does it?
It does also not make any sense that any other person alive would go into lion's hell.
A dummy does not fool any emergency staff at UCLA (except they are in), a corpse would do for some seconds - but then again: not a heated, unthawed or else treated one.
Narrowing the time window and adding pressure ("they have found out") does not make it more plausible that a corpse would be used either.

And if they would have found out a secret plan - why would they not find out the many publicly distributed clues of MJ still being alive and would not be chasing him around the globe - the more as his kids are a very prominent target now?
Would the kids be so happy if MJ would still be chased?

Create your day. Create the most astounding year of your life. Be the change you want to see in the world! L.O.V.E.
***********************************************************************************************
"I am tired, I am really tired of manipulation." Michael Jackson, Harlem, New York, NY, July 6, 2002
***********************************************************************************************
******* Let's tear the walls in the brains of this world down.*******

Time to BE.

TS_commentsTopic starter

Quote from: Im_convincedmjalive on November 27, 2011, 11:11:46 PM

... At the hospital it was Murray who urged the DR.'s to keep going and it is my belief that he finally said at the correct hoax time of death (2:26) ok you can call it. I have wrote about my theory regarding Murray being the influence on Cooper to call time of death in another thread.

I might also point out that the 2:26 death time is the least important of all the numerology.  So even IF the death had been called earlier, it would not change the major times/dates (12:21, 9-9-09, etc).

Australian MJ BeLIEver

November 27, 2011, 11:46:44 PM #1251 Last Edit: November 27, 2011, 11:53:01 PM by Australian MJ BeLIEver
Quote from: ~Souza~ on November 27, 2011, 07:47:28 PM

Quote

a. The 911 call was in the first few seconds of 12:21
b. 12:21 to 2:26 is 2 hours and 5 minutes on June 25; 2 + 5 = 7
c. 1,221 + 226 = 1447; 1 + 4 + 4 + 7 = 16; 1 + 6 = 7
d. Memorial 7th day of 7th month, 7 years after will (and full moon)
e. 77 days from "death" to 9-9-09
f. 7 days from "burial" to 9-9-09 (and almost full moon)
g. THIS IS IT vowels = 999
h. HIS (HIStory and THIS IS IT) backwards = 1998
i. 1998 autograph; 1998 - 666 = 1332 / 4 = 333 + 666 = 999
j. 777 + 999 = 1776
k. All of these numbers (333, 666, 777, 999, 1221, 1776, 1998) are divisible by 111
l. 8 + 16 + 1977 = 2001; 6 + 25 + 2009 = 2040 (space intros for Elvis and MJ)

http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/tiai_update_6_5.php

Quote from: scorpionchik on November 27, 2011, 11:14:42 PM

Certainly different type of numerology from what I know. Thank you Souza.

@Bec, I won't bother reading TS as detailed as you do.  Sooner or later everything will be clear anyway.
BTW, as much as I read TS posts, I found many incosistencies.

@ scorpion, are you talking of TS inconsistencies in this thread or the numerology thread? either way if you see inconsistencies you should share them with other members. more eyes on a subject often bring clarity. perhaps some of the percieved inconsistencies could be debunked or on the flip side supported (with evidence and reasons why for the argument) by others.

if it is within the TIAI threads that you see inconsistancies with TS posts, definitely point it out. So that we can investigate your theory or doubt. (@ others - not saying investigate the authenticity of TS rather aspecific percieved inconsistancy) this is part of the investigation. you might have your question or doubt answered if you share the info.

@others - btw, for anyone who hasnt read it, the numerology thread is really worth reading. i didnt understand the concept (not a numbers person by any stretch of the imagination!) until i read that entire thread. a must read for a true hoaxer. if you then disagree with it after reading it, then at least you are making an informed decision. but to disagree with it without looking at it is IMO foolish, as with everything abt this hoax, things need to be looked at from all angles. not just our favourite angles. but that is just my personal opinion.
People laugh when I explain. And though they may laugh, that doesn't change the fact that it's still the truth.


Michael is Alive
The end of evil is nigh
Trust in God
The righteous will prevail

TS_commentsTopic starter

Can anyone come up with the longest time that UCLA has worked a flat-lined patient, before calling the death?

Also might check other hospitals, for comparison.


scorpionchik

November 28, 2011, 12:07:30 AM #1253 Last Edit: November 28, 2011, 12:09:30 AM by scorpionchik
Quote from: TS_comments on November 27, 2011, 11:19:36 PM

Quote from: scorpionchik on November 27, 2011, 11:14:42 PM

BTW, as much as I read TS posts, I found many incosistencies.

Could you give one or two examples?

MANY people have tried to debunk what I have said, and so far EVERYONE who has attempted has failed.  So if you can do it, you would be the very first one in more than two years of failed attempts!

I won't fail trust me and I have written about them in my previous posts. The problem is it will take time to recall or find my posts. I'll try to do that. There were inconsistencies otherwise I would never say so; I don't blame people in vain. Don't be scared be wrong, you are human, right?
EndlesslovetoMJ

Australian MJ BeLIEver

have no idea how to even begin working out how long UCLA will work on a flatliner - let alone the longest flat liner...

but will look at some cardiology / hoispital links applicable to australia in my research.

naturally i know what flatline is. but just thought i would put the wiki description here as it contained additional info that i was not aware of that may be useful - considering chest compressions were being done at carolwood

A flatline is an electrical time sequence measurement that shows no activity and therefore when represented, shows a flat line instead of a moving one. It almost always refers to either a flatlined electrocardiogram, where the heart shows no electrical activity (asystole), or to a flat electroencephalogram, in which the brain shows no electrical activity (brain death). Both of these specific cases are involved in various definitions of death. Some consider one who has flatlined to be clinically dead, regardless of eventual resuscitation or lack thereof, whereas others insist that one is alive until the moment of brain death. This is mostly used in the medical industry when a person's pulse has stopped, indicating a flat line on the heart monitor.

When a patient displays a cardiac flatline, the treatment of choice is an injection of vasopressin (epinephrine and atropine are also possibilities) [1] and chest compressions. Successful resuscitation is generally unlikely and is inversely related to the length of time spent attempting resuscitation. Despite defibrillation commonly appearing on medical dramas as a remedy for asystole, it is usually not done when there is a total absence of electrical activity, as it could actually make it more difficult to restart the heart.

A flatline will also be generated if all leads are disconnected from the patient. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatline

People laugh when I explain. And though they may laugh, that doesn't change the fact that it's still the truth.


Michael is Alive
The end of evil is nigh
Trust in God
The righteous will prevail

Adi

November 28, 2011, 12:27:33 AM #1255 Last Edit: November 28, 2011, 12:32:07 AM by Adi
Quote from: TS_comments on November 27, 2011, 11:59:48 PM

Can anyone come up with the longest time that UCLA has worked a flat-lined patient, before calling the death?

Also might check other hospitals, for comparison.

I just found this......EDIT: although this is about people who lived!

http://www.cpr-etc.com/michael-jackson-cpr.html

UCLA Med Center Pioneers Lifesaving Technology - Could it Have Saved Michael Jackson?

When Michael Jackson went into cardiac arrest, rescuers took him to a place known for bringing the dead back to life. A world-renowned surgeon at the UCLA Medical Center has pioneered a way to revive people that most doctors would have long written off, including a woman whose heart had stopped for 2 1/2 hours.
Tested on a few dozen cardiac arrest patients, 80 percent survived. Usually, more than 80 percent perish.
"They took people who were basically dead, not all that different than Michael Jackson, and saved most of them," said Dr. Lance Becker, anemergency medicine specialist at the University of Pennsylvania and an American Heart Association spokesman.
Could Jackson, too, have been saved?
It's impossible to know. Doctors at the hospital worked on him for an hour. The UCLA expert, cardiothoracic surgeon Dr. Gerald Buckberg, said he was not personally involved in Jackson's treatment, and that too little is known about what preceded it.
"We have no idea when he died versus when he was found," Buckberg said in a telephone interview.
However, the results in other patients show that "the window is wide open to new thinking" about how long people can be successfully resuscitated after their hearts quit beating, Buckberg said. "We can salvage them way beyond the current time frames that are used. We've changed the concept of when the heart is dead permanently."
They call it "the Lazarus syndrome" for the man the Bible says Jesus raised from the dead.
Let's be clear: No one is saying that people long dead without medical attention can be revived. The lucky ones in Buckberg's study received quick help, and the reason they suffered cardiac arrest was known and could be fixed: blocked arteries causing a heart attack, in most cases.
Buckberg's method requires:
_Prompt CPR — rhythmic chest compressions — to maintain blood pressure until the patient gets to a hospital.
_Use of a heart-lung machine to keep blood and oxygen moving through the body while doctors remedy what caused the heart to quiver or stop in the first place, such as a drug overdose or a clogged artery.
_Special procedures and medicines to gradually restore blood and oxygen flow, so a sudden gush does not cause fresh damage.
Without all three elements, patients might suffer brain damage if they survive at all.
"You can save the heart and lose the brain," Buckberg explained.
UCLA and hospitals in Birmingham, Ala.; Ann Arbor, Mich.; and in Germany tested Buckberg's method on 34 patients who had been in cardiac arrest for an average of 72 minutes. All had failed resuscitation methods with standard CPR and defibrillation to try to shock their hearts back to beating.
Only seven died. Only two survivors were left with permanent neurological damage. Results were published in 2006 in the journal Resuscitation.
Dr. Constantine Athanasuleas (pronounced uh-than-uh-SOO'-lee-us), a surgeon at the University of Alabama at Birmingham, treated one man in the study who had been in cardiac arrest for about an hour and a half. The man's wife, a nurse, did CPR until a helicopter brought him to the hospital.
"He was flatlined," with a heart "as still as your dining room table," Athanasuleas said.
Doctors put him on a heart-lung machine, whisked him to the catheterization lab to see if he had artery blockages, then did bypass surgery to detour around them.
"The guy went home and was neurologically perfect" at least two years later, the doctor said.
Buckberg treated a woman who had been in cardiac arrest for 2 1/2 hours.
He would not send her to the operating room until her CPR and blood pressure could be maintained so further treatment could be attempted, he said.
Sadly, the woman survived all this but died several weeks later from an infection.
Buckberg has taken his work further in experiments with pigs in cardiac arrest. He deliberately deprived their brains of blood flow for half an hour, then used his resuscitation techniques to bring them back, with normal or near-normal function. Results presented at a heart association conference last fall stunned many, including Dr. Myron Weisfeldt, a cardiologist and chairman of medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
"He's doing extraordinary things. You almost don't believe the results that he got," Weisfeldt said of Buckberg. "Most of us carry around in our head that if somebody's brain is deprived of blood flow for 10 to 15 minutes that we're just not going to get them back to any useful function. His data suggest it's possible."
Doctors in Japan, Taiwan and elsewhere in Asia have tried approaches similar to Buckberg's with excellent results, said Becker, who is about to try it in Philadelphia.
"It takes training. It takes rethinking" to get doctors to adopt something this new, and funding for bigger studies to prove it works, Buckberg said


BeTheChange

Here's what I've been able to find with just a quick glance (but one is a media article and the other is a personal story...so not sure how accurate or credible they are).  There may be more out there but would need time to research and verify the info:

-Oconee Medical Center:  Worked on a 52-year-old male for 45 minutes and had called the death before a nurse felt a faint pulse.
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/28871606/ns/today-today_people/t/call-him-officer-lazarus-cop-survives-flatlining-twice/

-On 24th October 2008, Dr Sean George, a consultant physician in a West Australian hospital, returned from the dead to amaze colleagues who had battled for almost 55 minutes to revive his lifeless heart.
http://www.seangeorge.com.au/

With L.O.V.E. always.

The beauty of Michael Jackson is found in his heart and soul...his enormous talent is a bonus and what a bonus it is.

~PLAY the moments...PAUSE the memories...STOP the pain...REWIND the happiness~

Australian MJ BeLIEver

November 28, 2011, 12:37:02 AM #1257 Last Edit: November 28, 2011, 12:38:51 AM by Australian MJ BeLIEver

OK, i have just found out from a (very close) friend / Registered nurse in Australia, that sometimes when a patient 'flatlines' they 'shock' him or her for ten to 15 mins after the heart stops. he said 'They mostly try for the family so the family can see a all attempts are being made for lifesaving, even though they know it more than likely wont change the result. its to demonstrate that all attempts of revival is being made, however 99 percent of the time it doesnt work (that is, shock after flatline) he also mentioned that what you see on TV - defibing after flatline and then revival - is mostly fictional and rarely happens.

also with compressions or defibing, if they cant start it in a certian amount of time brain damage is likely to occur. brain damage can set in anywhere between 6 and 15 minutes.

my friend actually works in triage nurse in the ER dept. Royal Melb hospital - so i do believe this information is credible.

People laugh when I explain. And though they may laugh, that doesn't change the fact that it's still the truth.


Michael is Alive
The end of evil is nigh
Trust in God
The righteous will prevail

Australian MJ BeLIEver

@ be the change - LOL - our posts totally contradict each other ::D

anyways, i am just posting the info i have been told. i am sure in freak instances death defies the odds and people do come back after flat lining for more than 15 mins..

People laugh when I explain. And though they may laugh, that doesn't change the fact that it's still the truth.


Michael is Alive
The end of evil is nigh
Trust in God
The righteous will prevail

bec

http://www.cpr-etc.com/michael-jackson-cpr.html

2 and 1/2 hours for one woman. Sadly she died 2 weeks later from complications.

Quote

They call it "the Lazarus syndrome" for the man the Bible says Jesus raised from the dead.

Let's be clear: No one is saying that people long dead without medical attention can be revived. The lucky ones in Buckberg's study received quick help, and the reason they suffered cardiac arrest was known and could be fixed: blocked arteries causing a heart attack, in most cases.

Buckberg's method requires:

_Prompt CPR — rhythmic chest compressions — to maintain blood pressure until the patient gets to a hospital.

_Use of a heart-lung machine to keep blood and oxygen moving through the body while doctors remedy what caused the heart to quiver or stop in the first place, such as a drug overdose or a clogged artery.

_Special procedures and medicines to gradually restore blood and oxygen flow, so a sudden gush does not cause fresh damage.

Without all three elements, patients might suffer brain damage if they survive at all.

"You can save the heart and lose the brain," Buckberg explained.

UCLA and hospitals in Birmingham, Ala.; Ann Arbor, Mich.; and in Germany tested Buckberg's method on 34 patients who had been in cardiac arrest for an average of 72 minutes. All had failed resuscitation methods with standard CPR and defibrillation to try to shock their hearts back to beating.

Only seven died. Only two survivors were left with permanent neurological damage. Results were published in 2006 in the journal Resuscitation.

http://www.cpr-etc.com/michael-jackson-cpr.html

And etc etc.

But those are different circumstances. They weren't patients left at the scene for ~45 minutes prior to receiving ER care. They had known conditions and the causation of the cardiac arrest was correctable. They also received correct (ahem) CPR. This article seems to indicate that makes a difference. The patient would also have to be receiving this specialized rescessitation care as described.

By contrast, we supposedly have MJ at Carrolwood waiting for Murray to argue with Paramedics that he's not dead yet while he picks up Propofol bottles, before he's transported to the ER where they believe he is a healthy 50 year old male with unknown cause cardiac arrest.

We knew about this article in 2009 and it didn't seem relavent to the circumstances around MJ's death. It seems even less relevant now.

Are you entertained?

Similar topics (5)