Quote from: TS_comments on November 09, 2011, 03:19:44 PM[....]
[....]
[....]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 Possibilities
Now I'm going to propose 7 different possible scenarios—none of which would mean that 12:21 was not part of the planned numerology and timing, OR that the statements I have previously made about the 911 timing prove that TS is fake. So if I can come up with 7 possibilities—and my opposers did not even come up with a single possibility, that fits with what I've said in the past—then the real problem is not a lack of accuracy in what I have said, the real problem is that they are desperately trying to find something to disprove TS. Why? Because it is human nature; many people are too proud to admit that they made a mistake, just like so-called "fans" who would rather have MJ dead than admit that they are wrong (and the hoax investigators are right).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#1. The 911 Calls Were Staged
No actual phone calls were placed to either the BHPD or LAFD; the calls were staged (much like the ambulance photo). In this case, the information on the call screen was fabricated. My description of the 911 call was describing not what literally happened, but rather what the information on the screen was designed to represent (made to look like someone was waiting for 12:21 to make the call).
Considering the above possibility: notice that there was one rather small two-letter word in Update 4c, which carries a rather big meaning. "So if the caller was waiting for the right time to make the call, 12:21—and then pushed the speed dial button—about 4 seconds into the minute is what we would expect ..." {http://www.michaeljacksonhoaxforum.com/smf2.0/index.php?topic=7124.0}.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#2. MJ Was Gone to the Airport
For this scenario, I'm going to go on the idea that TS is actually MJ. But please do not take this and run with it; I am merely showing that if MJ himself could make the same statements about the 911 call, and still not be a fake—then just as much or more could someone other than MJ make these same statements, and yet not be a fake.
What if MJ had already gone to the airport, before the 911 call was made; he was not there in person, to observe what actually happened. Someone at the house not in on it was urging that someone call 911, and by 12:20 Alvarez felt that he could not delay any longer without raising too much suspicion; so he called 911 a little early. In spite of the early call, the transfer to LAFD was not completed until 12:21; and this provided an opportunity for good old TMZ to still report the intended time, 12:21 {http://www.tmz.com/2009/06/26/michael-jackson-the-911-call/}. Other media copied TMZ's report, and so 12:21 became the time of the 911 call reported almost everywhere. Nevertheless, this scenario does not explain the discrepancies in timing given by BHPD and LAFD, etc.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#3. "ORIGINAL W911 INFO (12:21:04)"
Alvarez called 911 immediately at 12:21:00; BHPD at answered at 12:21:04. Within a reasonable time of 14 seconds (not a long delay of 46 seconds): BHPD determined the emergency needed LAFD (not police), and transferred to LAFD by 12:21:18 (as Ruda said). In this case, both the original call and the transfer occurred during the minute of 12:21; therefore, this ensured that the media would report 12:21—regardless of whether they reported the original call, or the time LAFD got the call (and would be another good reason for starting the call exactly at 12:21, and not 15 or 30 seconds later).
In support of this scenario (see picture above), the call screen says "ORIGINAL W911 [wireless 911] INFO (12:21:04) ..."; and then there are three lines of info about the ORIGINAL Alvarez call, but not info about the BHPD or the call transfer (that info was in the previous lines above).
This leads to the question of why the time "12:21:04" is even listed on the call screen. For what purpose is this information provided to the FS71 paramedics? If it's merely the time when BHPD trunk line 009 was released (open for a new 911 call to come into BHPD on that trunk line, as Dona testified): why would FS71 paramedics care a whit about that time, why would it be on their call screen? Would this information help them know what action to take in an emergency?
Wouldn't it be far more important for the paramedics to know the time when the emergency call first came in at the BHPD? What if BHPD had an emergency of their own (and that can happen), and it took them three minutes to transfer the call to LAFD? Wouldn't FS71 want to know how long since the emergency started, so that they could assess things like how long the house has been burning (in the case of a fire)? This is the only time on the call screen with seconds included (12:21:04). Why is the only time given in seconds also the only time on the screen which doesn't even need to be there at all (if it's really nothing other than BHPD trunk line release time)—much less have the exact seconds?? The paramedics really don't even need to know when the LAFD call center first received the call (much less any BHPD trunk release time); yet even if they did need that info, for some reason, it would be about 12:20:55 (if Norris times are correct)—not 12:21:04!
However, if the timing from BHPD is either intentionally fabricated or some huge mistake—and 12:21:04 is the time when the original call first came in to BHPD—then we have a very good reason why it is listed on the FS71 call screen, and even listed in seconds. The exact time (including seconds) listed on the call screen helps the firefighters and paramedics to understand just how long the emergency situation has been in progress, which in turn helps them determine how to respond to the emergency. This would also explain why 12:21:04 is listed on the call screen as "ORIGINAL" call info (not BHPD transfer info)!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#4. "The Caller" Was Not Alvarez
Alvarez did not actually call "911", since it was not a real emergency; instead, he used a different number to call someone at the BHPD who was in on it. This key person at BHPD transferred Alvarez's call to LAFD at 12:21:04; and I was actually referring to him (not Alvarez) when I said "the caller". Do you think it was an accident that I said "the caller", and not "Alvarez"? In this scenario, the "911 operator" would refer to an operator taking emergency calls at the LAFD dispatch center (not someone at BHPD).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#5. The Beverly Hills Hotel
This scenario is essentially the same as #4, except for the following. Nobody from the BHPD was in on it at the time, and no calls went through them—either on regular lines, or on a cell phone. This would therefore reduce the chances of any police showing up at the scene who were not in on the hoax; and it would also reduce the chances of the situation being broadcast on police radios—which paparazzi could hear on their police scanners, and show up at Carolwood, making it more difficult for Chris to get the magic picture. So instead of calling BHPD, Alvarez called someone waiting at the Beverly Hills Hotel; this person then transferred the call on to LAFD at 12:21:04, much like the description above in #4.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#6. Alvarez Called LAFD Directly
Alvarez called the LAFD dispatch (at 12:21:04), using a direct number not 911. In this scenario, there was no transfer process either through the BHPD or through someone at the Beverly Hills Hotel. Like #5, this option also keeps the BHPD out of it, and reduces the people who need to be in on it. The time from 12:21:04 (call screen data) to 12:21:18 (Ruda) could be a transfer from whoever first answered at LAFD, to a specific person planned in advance who was in on it at LAFD (and same for #4 & #5, above).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
#7. Think For Yourself
Just like everything else in this illusion, no explanation seems to answer all of the questions. Nevertheless, think for yourself; and with the information that I have provided here, see if you can come up with a scenario that I have not specifically described—there is at least one more possibility (and probably several more).
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Which One of the 7?
Finally, does it really matter which one of these above 7 options is the correct one? And even if I told you which one, how could I prove it? Just because I know the answer to something does not mean I say the answer; I normally limit my statements to things that I can back up pretty solidly (except of course the things that I've said jokingly). [...]
