0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Sexy is one thing. Suggestive and lewd is quite another. From your mouth to God's ears! Thank you! Stay Blessed!OnTheWingsOfLove
Sexy is one thing. Suggestive and lewd is quite another.
I personally have a real problem with women allowing themselves to be portrayed as sex slaves and lust demons. ....If there is an illuminati, then it will always win as long as society keeps salivating for more, more, more of the same. The freakier the better. ..... The same with some of the other videos out there where every body has to be nearly naked, roll their asses and open their legs and slide down poles, even imaginary ones. .... Call it what you want, but I can’t get with women allowing themselves to become objectified. .... Sexy is one thing. Suggestive and lewd is quite another.
This is entertainment. It's supposed to be flashy, it's supposed to be provocative. It doesn't mean anybody worships Satan.Nobody needs to prove Rihanna "has nothing to do with the Illuminati". You would have to prove such an organization exists first, and even then it would be up to you to prove she is a part of it, not the other way around. You can't prove Michael is innocent of molesting children either, you have to prove he's guilty. You can't prove there are no invisible pink unicorns, yet, they probably do not exist. Still, if I wanted to I could probably find thousands of symbols indicating their existence, as well as the existence of an international invsible pink unicorn conspiracy. Seriously.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginThis is entertainment. It's supposed to be flashy, it's supposed to be provocative. It doesn't mean anybody worships Satan.Nobody needs to prove Rihanna "has nothing to do with the Illuminati". You would have to prove such an organization exists first, and even then it would be up to you to prove she is a part of it, not the other way around. You can't prove Michael is innocent of molesting children either, you have to prove he's guilty. You can't prove there are no invisible pink unicorns, yet, they probably do not exist. Still, if I wanted to I could probably find thousands of symbols indicating their existence, as well as the existence of an international invsible pink unicorn conspiracy. Seriously.Well said, BeeBee. And you are just right! The burden of proof have those who claim something, not the other way round; i. e. the negative or absence of something (that is a global legal principle).And about showing "sexyness" on stage: I do believe that Michael invented the "just acting" / performing / even faking sexyness on stage which comes with a huge restriction; "don`t (ever dare to) touch!".That`s a form of art. Very unique. And very Michael"ish" (given his early experiences).
I am not speaking particularly of worhipping satan I’m talking about cheapening yourself for money and negative attention and power, not for your benefit, but for someone else’s. She can worship a cow as far as I’m concerned. that’s not my point. One has nothing to do with the other. When we stop accepting or daughters and sisters and lovers allowing a male driven industury to exploit them, that’s when things will change. Until then, we can expect more, more, more of the same. When Michael is on stage he is sexy in a tasteful way. He never stoops to having women roll up on him nor did he do anything even close to that to any women in his videos. Though I’m sure there were many willing to do it at the drop of a hat. He didn’t need that to prove he was the best. The same for the Beatles, Elvis, and so on. That in my opinion is wht a real entertainer is about. Don’t need nothing else.
I would like to clarify that i have no problem with people who took the decision to be atheists, each person is free to believe or not believe, ....free will
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI would like to clarify that i have no problem with people who took the decision to be atheists, each person is free to believe or not believe, ....free willI agree. But if this was intentional (and if it really does translate to that) I do have a problem with it because she would have known everybody was going to sing along to that. It's catchy! So it's like tricking everyone into singing that there is no God. argue/