0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
She actually moved the bottle from the floor to the nightstand. They should have asked her what else she moved.She really emphasized how hindsight helps you think more clearly. (Front and TS points)This reminds me of the LAPD erasing all but 4 minutes of the security footage because they thought at the time that it was a natural death. LOLYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginIf anyone grabbed a screenshot of Exhibit AA, PLEASE post it. Thanks. With L.O.V.E. always.I went through the last 2 hours of the trial, never saw an AA...when the defense started showing their photos, they started at BB ( Bravo, Bravo)Could you tell me what exhibit B or BB actually was? Thanks.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginIf anyone grabbed a screenshot of Exhibit AA, PLEASE post it. Thanks. With L.O.V.E. always.I went through the last 2 hours of the trial, never saw an AA...when the defense started showing their photos, they started at BB ( Bravo, Bravo)
If anyone grabbed a screenshot of Exhibit AA, PLEASE post it. Thanks. With L.O.V.E. always.
Quote from: BeTheChangeIf anyone grabbed a screenshot of Exhibit AA, PLEASE post it. Thanks. With L.O.V.E. always.Here you go.
Imo, this is pointing more towards 2004-5 when Michael´s house was raided and pics were taken. Michael´s trial was based in false evidence and well, here is an example of how sloppy people can be when working.
when listening to that woman I could not resist to think about this joke... 2 policemen working on an accident...while one is talking about the scene, the other is writing down what he says...police talking:-"leg on the right side of the road, arm on the left side, head on the slope near the accident.."police writing asks:-"how do you spell slope?", "with one or 2 p"?the police talking kicks the head away...and says...:-"head on the left side of the road"
Argh, Rai here. Can't believe someone would be so improper as to destroy their notes. Gets you wondering, hm? I think that the Notes from June 25th would've been more relevant than the Notes taken on June 29th, since there would've been more Evidence surely. Fingerprints were never explained either, just assumed to be from moving the Table, I guess? wonder when we're going to get straight answers...
LaToya was at the house collecting stuff, another point to consider.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginArgh, Rai here. Can't believe someone would be so improper as to destroy their notes. Gets you wondering, hm? I think that the Notes from June 25th would've been more relevant than the Notes taken on June 29th, since there would've been more Evidence surely. Fingerprints were never explained either, just assumed to be from moving the Table, I guess? wonder when we're going to get straight answers...That's what I question also. If I were taking notes on the 25th even if it was just a "this is what I saw" kind of thing, I would put the about location and what was next to it etc. You know like little markers. Now not saying that she didn't have her own way of doing this. Then when going back over on the 29th, I would go over the notes that I had written on the 25th to make sure that everything matches up. Again not saying that she didn't do this. But let's be honest it doesn't sound like she did. Also I'll mention again that another thing that bothers me is we can't forget that the family went into the house between all of this so who's to say Fleak didn't take note of something on the floor and when she came back on the 29th it was moved, either by the family or the other investigator that was there on the 26th. Would she have noticed? That's a question that remains unanswered.