0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY to MJ_ForeverandAlways. I hope you have an amazing day sweety. I Love You. bearhug party/ [/quoteYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginOctober 28, 2011 Happy Birthdays MJ_ForeverandAlways beerchug Thank you PureLove & Paula-C for the Birthday wishes.....They really mean a lot to me!! I Love you all..... with all my heart!! bearhug
October 28, 2011 Happy Birthdays MJ_ForeverandAlways beerchug
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI predict the next level "7" will be October 28 ... Good guess.
I predict the next level "7" will be October 28 ...
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI predict the next level "7" will be October 28 ... Good guess.do you think the murray hospital thing has something to do with TS not posting today...? bangbang
Happy Birthday wishes to you both. This is an amazing adventure we are on together. One that has been very much enriched by you both. Thank you for all you have researched, written about and shared on the forum and other places on the web. You have helped us understand better and LOVE more.Make a special wish on the next wishingstar of the evening, I will be thinking of you with LOVE.Blessings to you both always,Wishingstar
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or Login>I predict the next level "7" will be October 28 ... Good guess.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginI predict the next level "7" will be October 28 ... Good guess.do you think the murray hospital thing has something to do with TS not posting today...? bangbangAh! I see now. That's how easy it is to make false assumptions. Good guess doesn't mean it's the right guess. :lol: :lol:
What I understood from yesterday, about defence position..1. Murray indeed is one fool of a Dr. who indeed had no equipment,who was coming and going,leaving his ONE and only patient all alone. Negligence. Confirmed.2. Being, as we know, "the gloved one", Michael could inject all he wantsand swallow all the pills he want [while Murray was having fun in the bathroom], leaving no fingerprints. From what I recall, his lovely fingerprints were NOT found on syringes, vials etc.3. Murder version, the theory I started with in 2010 - it kinda supports that, no news here. Murray is proved silly man with no equipment and no skill, spending enough time in the bathroom chatting via cellphone, while someone else comes in, injects Michael with whatever it was, leaves. Murray comes back zipping his pants and finds his one and only patient not breathing. But defence insists on MJ injecting himself BS.It does help that "reasonable doubt" thing though. So.... defence wants that doubtto rise, so jurors will be confused enough. Right? It's the only point.. andthe only chance for defence to make at least some jurors doubt Murray's guilt.But Murray is still negligent enough! Abandonment, negligence - proved.
Quote from: ~Souza~ on October 24, 2011, 02:16:09 AM <>>“But if your theory is that this mystery person killed MJ, then where does that leave your claim that Murray cried because he killed MJ?” Murray cooperated with the mystery person. And what if I confess that I am Con-rad Murder-y, and I want to turn myself in—would the court accept that, or dismiss it as hearsay? Well, it doesn’t matter anyway, because I am now officially giving up on the real murder theory; I give myself an “F”, for succeeding at “F-ailure” (I failed to prove murder). La Toya supported me when I started this thread (on 9-27-11), by tweeting that “This is definitely straight a murder trial” {http://twitter.com/#!/latoyajackson/status/118700418254639104}; but now she has spilled the beans, let the cat out of the bag, by saying that it’s a fake death made to look like murder—which is exactly what “The Illusionist” movie is all about {for which version of “The Illusionist”, see Anna’s good post You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login.
Okay, I will give my take on this 911 call, it might give some people peace of mind.Here is the complete call:<iframe frameborder="0" width="480" height="360" src="You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login"></iframe><br /><a href="You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login" target="_blank">Conrad Murray Trial: 911 call played in court</a> <i>door <a href="You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login" target="_blank">itnnews</a></i>I for one don't even understand why someone with an emergency would have to go through two people. Most of the 911 calls come in exactly where they should: the person that can send an ambulance right away. But Alvarez first gets the BHPD. Now notice the difference between the woman from the BHPD and the guy from the LAFD. She only picks up (if she even picked up and didn't call Alvarez herself) with 911 emergency. She does not ask for a location, nor does she ask what the emergency is. She has no clue if she should send the cops or an ambulance, because Alvarez only mentioned 'an emergency' and the address. On top of it all, she is going to explain to Alberto that she is going to put him through with the LAFD. Who cares? He has 'an emergency'! All together, as confirmed by Dona Norris on the stand, this whole conversation lasted 46 seconds. 46 seconds is way too much if a person has a cardiac arrest, but hey, how would she know? She only asked for the address, before explaining what she was going to do, before she finally puts the man through with a 3-digit number. If Alvarez actually needed the cops because there was someone with a gun in the house, the LAFD would have to put him through to the BHPD/LAPD again. So we can safely assume that the woman knew exactly what was going on.Now there are two scenarios: 1. It is normal in LA that you are put through by the police to the LAFD in an emergency and they called early to make sure the woman of the BHPD could put them through at exactly 12:21. That is not so difficult to plan, since we already established that officials are in on this and this first conversation only confirms that in my opinion.2. They didn't want to rely on the cellphone (mine isn't always working when I want either) and therefor they decided to call the BHPD first, to make sure the call would be received at 12:21. Because 12:21 IS the time the call came in, according to the records (and Dona Norris confirmed that 12:21:04 was the time the call was actually released) and according to the screen in the ambulance. This is the time the world would hear.I also doubt if it's really 911 that was called, or that they worked with direct numbers. The guy of the LAFD hangs up the phone, which is against protocol, so maybe he was asked to pick up an internal line during his break. Norris and her 'fictious phone number that was phone company stuff' makes me think that that is a possibility.Anyways, TS correct me if I'm wrong, there might be a third option, but these are already two points that explain the 12:20:18 and the lack of speed by the BHPD.
Ah! I see now. That's how easy it is to make false assumptions. Good guess doesn't mean it's the right guess. :lol: :lol: