0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 12:28:59 AM
he voice recording as well? The message in that recording is wonderful



and the fact they don't play the WHOLE thing anymore...all the news outlets cut it off at "go...go...go..." WTF??
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
<img src="You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login">

*

_Anna_

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 12:35:50 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Im_convinced, how does the sting court theory explain the 32 stars on the seal? All other debate points aside, that by itself debunks Sting court as you have presented it. If it's not real then neither is court. If court isn't real the Prosecution isn't technically acting improperly. If the Prosecution isn't acting improperly, in your theory, there is no Sting. You've proved corruption in CA but it doesn't matter. It's not an official seal. No seal=no court. No court=no Sting.
I think the picture that we see when the camera goes off when the jury is out is the TV stations design. I think the camera shuts off completely during breaks. I do not think it is the actual courtroom seal on the wall. You know how at the end of the broadcast there is the stripes of colors? Or like when a station shows a black screen with the wording stay tuned? ;)
Look at the background wall on the screen cap from today. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Panel pattern is different. I couldn't attach or upload to yfrog, sorry it's on twitpic. fresse/





So?


So you're saying it's perfectly normal for every single network media channel that is live feeding from the court house to be displaying a fake seal during all court breaks every day in the midst of a real trial. Come on.


As far as the background, again, so? So I don't see a seal hanging on the wall in your twitpic. All you proved is that there is no seal hanging on the wall directly behind the judge. That was never in question.


How do you know it isn't hanging near the ceiling and that the upper wall of the courtroom isn't bearing this type of design? How do you know it isn't in the hallway outside of the courtroom? How do you know it isn't hanging in the front entrance of the court house? How do you know it isn't hanging on some DOME project set being fed live into the networks through a cable run through the courthouse's channel? But that's the point isn't it? Not where it's hanging... but why is it fake if this is an FBI Sting court? And how is it being displayed by all networks?


On the other hand, if this is a hoax court, it is fake because it displays for all to see the crucial dividing line between a hoax and a fraud. It prevents entrapment, ie trapping the media into believing MJ is really dead. We know he's not... they could know too, but they chose to look the other way. You can add the non-believer fans and the general public to this list as well.


Perhaps this is what Front meant when he talked about fake fans and tabloid associates. They are all in the same category; they refuse to see the truth that's right there in Front of their eyes, and they will be angry when he reveals. 32 stars protect MJ from being accused of entrapment.

Yes, the question is WHY is it fake, no wether it is or not at the court, but I'm thinking about something else now- the seal is wrong, it was made for the streams and TV, it is not a spot on which the camera is fixed during breaks, it's just a background screen created for streams breaks- but the trial actually takes place at the court because you see fans, people around there, you saw Flanagan going out from the real court on live stream, etc. So if it takes place at the real court, wouldn't it still mean entrapment and fraud? Regardless the background seal shown on TV.  Even being fake, the whole trial takes place there, it's not a set up. Wouldn't that mean fraud because the court is the real court? You imagine that people from there WOULD go at the court, fans, to support, etc. They would see if there is actual move there or not. So it's not a studio.
Last Edit: October 01, 2011, 12:40:30 AM by _Anna_
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

bec

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 12:43:45 AM
@Anna, that's where all the other 999,999 clues come in. Lol.


Just kidding.


No, I don't think doing it at a real courthouse in a real courtroom constitutes entrapment so long as the proceedings are clearly not official in nature. The state seal makes everything official government business, from documents to letterheads to courtrooms. A fake seal renders these things invalid. There was another fake seal in the last 2 years as I recall, DC perhaps? Off the top of my head I don't remember which document but it was also something obviously inaccurate about the seal. It was CA also.

(edited to add: what I'm trying to say is that a state seal is like a government signature. A falsified signature renders a document, transaction, or agreement invalid. Forging a signature is done with the goal of being an exact replica, ie performed with the intent to deceive. In this case, the incorrect seal is not fraudulent because this replica is clearly and obviously not the same... visible by anyone who cares to notice.)
Last Edit: October 01, 2011, 12:50:42 AM by bec
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Are you entertained?

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 12:45:02 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Im_convinced, how does the sting court theory explain the 32 stars on the seal? All other debate points aside, that by itself debunks Sting court as you have presented it. If it's not real then neither is court. If court isn't real the Prosecution isn't technically acting improperly. If the Prosecution isn't acting improperly, in your theory, there is no Sting. You've proved corruption in CA but it doesn't matter. It's not an official seal. No seal=no court. No court=no Sting.
I think the picture that we see when the camera goes off when the jury is out is the TV stations design. I think the camera shuts off completely during breaks. I do not think it is the actual courtroom seal on the wall. You know how at the end of the broadcast there is the stripes of colors? Or like when a station shows a black screen with the wording stay tuned? ;)
Look at the background wall on the screen cap from today. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Panel pattern is different. I couldn't attach or upload to yfrog, sorry it's on twitpic. fresse/





So?


So you're saying it's perfectly normal for every single network media channel that is live feeding from the court house to be displaying a fake seal during all court breaks every day in the midst of a real trial. Come on.


As far as the background, again, so? So I don't see a seal hanging on the wall in your twitpic. All you proved is that there is no seal hanging on the wall directly behind the judge. That was never in question.


How do you know it isn't hanging near the ceiling and that the upper wall of the courtroom isn't bearing this type of design? How do you know it isn't in the hallway outside of the courtroom? How do you know it isn't hanging in the front entrance of the court house? How do you know it isn't hanging on some DOME project set being fed live into the networks through a cable run through the courthouse's channel? But that's the point isn't it? Not where it's hanging... but why is it fake if this is an FBI Sting court? And how is it being displayed by all networks?


On the other hand, if this is a hoax court, it is fake because it displays for all to see the crucial dividing line between a hoax and a fraud. It prevents entrapment, ie trapping the media into believing MJ is really dead. We know he's not... they could know too, but they chose to look the other way. You can add the non-believer fans and the general public to this list as well.


Perhaps this is what Front meant when he talked about fake fans and tabloid associates. They are all in the same category; they refuse to see the truth that's right there in Front of their eyes, and they will be angry when he reveals. 32 stars protect MJ from being accused of entrapment.

Without degrading my intelligence perhaps someone can help me understand the whole seal issue. I understand there are 32 stars on one and 31 on another, we being hoaxers and looking/finding for things that others would normally not notice has become a daily routine in our lives, how is this suppose to be explained for the general public (non-believers) that this is a hoax/sting court and can prevent entrapment? The stars are not that easy to spot and something that people would just pick up on while waiting for court to start. I hope what I am saying and asking makes sense.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
~Mish~

"Breathe in waves of doubt, bitter in your mouth" - Toad The Wet Sprocket

*

bec

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 12:53:01 AM
Mish, because they could have done exactly what we did. It's not MJ's fault they believe in lies and rumors. We cared to know the truth, so we looked for it. Anyone could have done what we did... they just chose not to.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
Are you entertained?

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 03:01:23 AM
Hmmmmm, the last time I went to the thisisalsoit.com I was redirected to a website about 9/11.
Now I type thisisalsoit.com and I was redirected to this forum! :?:  Very strange I am so confused by TIAI /pull hair/.  I wish I understood it /pull hair/ /white flag/.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions


You rocked my world, you know you did
And everything I own I give
The rarest love who\'d think I\'d find
Someone like you to call mine




"Let us dream of tomorrow where we can truly love from the soul, and know love as the ultimate truth at the heart of all creation."
------Michael Jackson


Those who go beneath the surface do so at their peril. --Oscar Wilde

*

Adi

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 03:09:33 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
@Anna, that's where all the other 999,999 clues come in. Lol.


Just kidding.


No, I don't think doing it at a real courthouse in a real courtroom constitutes entrapment so long as the proceedings are clearly not official in nature. The state seal makes everything official government business, from documents to letterheads to courtrooms. A fake seal renders these things invalid. There was another fake seal in the last 2 years as I recall, DC perhaps? Off the top of my head I don't remember which document but it was also something obviously inaccurate about the seal. It was CA also.

(edited to add: what I'm trying to say is that a state seal is like a government signature. A falsified signature renders a document, transaction, or agreement invalid. Forging a signature is done with the goal of being an exact replica, ie performed with the intent to deceive. In this case, the incorrect seal is not fraudulent because this replica is clearly and obviously not the same... visible by anyone who cares to notice.)

Yeah there was Bec...wasn't it on the Autopsy Report? Didn't they use an out of date LA Coroners Seal on it?
 
I just recall there being a TIAI  redirect back in the dark ages ( :lol: ) to an information page on the LA Coroners website by TS and it kept swapping between pages every hour almost to highlight something that we were missing and then somebody finally picked up that the current LA Coroners seal used on their website was different to the one used on the AR......

Well this is from my memory anyway......but I think that was it.  ;))
 
Different Seals are becoming a common theme in this  8-)
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 03:45:06 AM





MICHEAL + MICHEAL   :D
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

trublu

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 03:57:58 AM
I am wondering about sworn testimonies and the laws regarding this in the states. I am assuming one cannot go to prison for perjury for lying under oath it is a hoax court, although, those religious people may find it unethical. Is a sworn testimony only valid in court? Or in the presence of legal officials too?


"I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God."
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Elsa

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 04:26:19 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I am wondering about sworn testimonies and the laws regarding this in the states. I am assuming one cannot go to prison for perjury for lying under oath it is a hoax court, although, those religious people may find it unethical. Is a sworn testimony only valid in court? Or in the presence of legal officials too?


"I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

I haven't seen anyone sworn in.
 
 
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

Adi

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 04:35:05 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I am wondering about sworn testimonies and the laws regarding this in the states. I am assuming one cannot go to prison for perjury for lying under oath it is a hoax court, although, those religious people may find it unethical. Is a sworn testimony only valid in court? Or in the presence of legal officials too?


"I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God."

Yep - I am not sure if the camera is on the witnesses when they are sworn in. Does anyone else???
 
I  only recall the lady with the elephant on her desk reading the oath to the witness but I can't recall if the camera moves to the witness to show them raising their hand and saying "I do"
 
Anyway - they do this oath all the time in other movies about court cases....so this shouldn't be any different  :lol:   8-)
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

curls

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 04:49:24 AM
Is the oath actually genuine, word for word?  I notice she doesn't say 'swear', but 'state'.

You can say and do anything if you're acting - that's the simplest way to make sense of all this.  The world is witnessing MJ in full creative production mode, an epic reality live film shoot if you like - it's just that most haven't realised that's what's happening - yet!

If you don't want 'the simplest way' ...... guess that's what 2 years of investigating have been about!

friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

SimPattyK

  • Registered users
  • Hoaxer
  • View Profile
  • 4308
  • MJ & ELVIS are ALIVE ~ TRUTH always prevails!
Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 05:12:55 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
[...]
@ TS: I'm happy to see you back!


With Mj & Elvis pulling the strings ^^

from the shadows of this ...

Kangaroo-Mascarade-Trial...  :lol: :lol:

IT'S ONLY A MOVIE !!
The BEST ever !!

 :) 8) :-*
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMpCb1sEJVc[/youtube]

IT'S ONLY A MOVIE !!- TOPIC:
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
MJ & ELVIS are ALIVE ~ You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 06:46:28 AM
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Im_convinced, how does the sting court theory explain the 32 stars on the seal? All other debate points aside, that by itself debunks Sting court as you have presented it. If it's not real then neither is court. If court isn't real the Prosecution isn't technically acting improperly. If the Prosecution isn't acting improperly, in your theory, there is no Sting. You've proved corruption in CA but it doesn't matter. It's not an official seal. No seal=no court. No court=no Sting.
I think the picture that we see when the camera goes off when the jury is out is the TV stations design. I think the camera shuts off completely during breaks. I do not think it is the actual courtroom seal on the wall. You know how at the end of the broadcast there is the stripes of colors? Or like when a station shows a black screen with the wording stay tuned? ;)
Look at the background wall on the screen cap from today. You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login Panel pattern is different. I couldn't attach or upload to yfrog, sorry it's on twitpic. fresse/





So?


So you're saying it's perfectly normal for every single network media channel that is live feeding from the court house to be displaying a fake seal during all court breaks every day in the midst of a real trial. Come on.


As far as the background, again, so? So I don't see a seal hanging on the wall in your twitpic. All you proved is that there is no seal hanging on the wall directly behind the judge. That was never in question.


How do you know it isn't hanging near the ceiling and that the upper wall of the courtroom isn't bearing this type of design? How do you know it isn't in the hallway outside of the courtroom? How do you know it isn't hanging in the front entrance of the court house? How do you know it isn't hanging on some DOME project set being fed live into the networks through a cable run through the courthouse's channel? But that's the point isn't it? Not where it's hanging... but why is it fake if this is an FBI Sting court? And how is it being displayed by all networks?


On the other hand, if this is a hoax court, it is fake because it displays for all to see the crucial dividing line between a hoax and a fraud. It prevents entrapment, ie trapping the media into believing MJ is really dead. We know he's not... they could know too, but they chose to look the other way. You can add the non-believer fans and the general public to this list as well.


Perhaps this is what Front meant when he talked about fake fans and tabloid associates. They are all in the same category; they refuse to see the truth that's right there in Front of their eyes, and they will be angry when he reveals. 32 stars protect MJ from being accused of entrapment.

Yes, the question is WHY is it fake, no wether it is or not at the court, but I'm thinking about something else now- the seal is wrong, it was made for the streams and TV, it is not a spot on which the camera is fixed during breaks, it's just a background screen created for streams breaks- but the trial actually takes place at the court because you see fans, people around there, you saw Flanagan going out from the real court on live stream, etc. So if it takes place at the real court, wouldn't it still mean entrapment and fraud? Regardless the background seal shown on TV.  Even being fake, the whole trial takes place there, it's not a set up. Wouldn't that mean fraud because the court is the real court? You imagine that people from there WOULD go at the court, fans, to support, etc. They would see if there is actual move there or not. So it's not a studio.



You just made me wonder, remember the "funeral" when all the live feed went through the Jacksons they controlled it and cut it off when the funeral started.  Could this be one camera in the court which is controlled and fed out to other media sources like at the funeral?  That way it would all have the same seal on when they were on a break? JMO not saying it correct.
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

*

angel

Re: TIAI September 27
October 01, 2011, 06:56:47 AM
The last time I listened to the 911 call I noticed the dispatch first said "VPI" instead of "VIP".  One of the interesting things VPI stands for is Voice Print International.  They do things like emergency voice recording and multimedia incident recreation, something called VPI Empower 911. 
friendly
0
funny
0
informative
0
agree
0
disagree
0
pwnt
0
like
0
dislike
0
late
0
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions
No reactions

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal