0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginJust one thing and I go to sleep.They said they couldn't find veins, that Michael had no good veins, but in this pic he seems to have very visible and sound veins:Of course it's a few years realier but they couldn't just vanish in the meantime.ah someone correct me if i am wrong but wasn't nurse lee one of the ones who said something about michael and small veins?Yes, it was nurse Lee who said Michael had very small veins.I am going to at this totally different..shocker, I know, lol.All this talk of veins......could it have been a play on words....Michael had no real/or very small VAINS...meaning he wasn't fully of vanity etc. People just automatically think of, "veins" because of this whole death thing. Perhaps it's the public's own fault for assuming, "vein" when it should be "vain"...........Also, if I am remembering correctly, this picture is taken from the "Keep it in the Closet" video shoot with Naomi Campbell....he would have done a lot of dancing etc. Hence, having his veins popping out more because of the exercise. Just an observation........Blessings
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginJust one thing and I go to sleep.They said they couldn't find veins, that Michael had no good veins, but in this pic he seems to have very visible and sound veins:Of course it's a few years realier but they couldn't just vanish in the meantime.ah someone correct me if i am wrong but wasn't nurse lee one of the ones who said something about michael and small veins?Yes, it was nurse Lee who said Michael had very small veins.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginJust one thing and I go to sleep.They said they couldn't find veins, that Michael had no good veins, but in this pic he seems to have very visible and sound veins:Of course it's a few years realier but they couldn't just vanish in the meantime.ah someone correct me if i am wrong but wasn't nurse lee one of the ones who said something about michael and small veins?
Just one thing and I go to sleep.They said they couldn't find veins, that Michael had no good veins, but in this pic he seems to have very visible and sound veins:Of course it's a few years realier but they couldn't just vanish in the meantime.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, it doesn’t matter anyway, because I am now officially giving up on the real murder theory; I give myself an “F”, for succeeding at “F-ailure” (I failed to prove murder). La Toya supported me when I started this thread (on 9-27-11), by tweeting that “This is definitely straight a murder trial” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}; but now she has spilled the beans, let the cat out of the bag, by saying that it’s a fake death made to look like murder—which is exactly what “The Illusionist” movie is all about {for which version of “The Illusionist”, see Anna’s good post You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}. La Toya’s statement really doesn’t even qualify as a clue; instead, it is a point-blank in-your-face wake-up alarm. By all means, do not overlook the fact that there are dozens or hundreds of major movies which La Toya could’ve referred to, with real murder plots in them, if the truth about MJ was real murder. Instead, she told us to watch the movie which ends like this: “… a montage shows Uhl putting the pieces together and discovering how Eisenheim faked Sophie's death and framed Leopold for the [fake] murder. The shot of Uhl closes with him … in realisation of the masterful illusion that has been so successfully planned & implemented.” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}. /bravo/ /woohoo/ /woohoo/ /bravo/ @TS-I am not picking your post apart since I won anyways, but I wanted to come back and respond to the info regarding the movie The Illusionist. I spent a little time looking on youtube for the movie. It seems there are bits and pieces of it uploaded but I have yet to come across the whole movie. Yesterday my daughter and I went for a walk and I was telling her about La Toya and what she said before going into court. I told my daughter that La Toya recommended that we should watch The Illusionist. I explained that I wanted to get that movie and she says mama we already have it. :shock: I said what? She says yea don't you remember you got it last year and I watched it but you didn't. I was like. bounce/ :mrgreen:I have watched the movie and it was awesome. I have some favorite parts as follows:After Sophie's death finally he (Eisenheim) emerged from his grief, bought a rundown theater, fired his manager and began preparing for a new kind of show. It is very interesting that Eisenheim fired his manager only to rehire him close to his departure. Hmm...Eisenheim always had a enthusiastic audience but now he was attracting a more impassioned following. Sounds familiar...The doctor shot the Prince up in his vein in his hand. What was the drug I wonder? The Prince wants Eisenheim arrested for fraud. After a show Eisenheim is in the police office with followers outside below. He goes to the window and addresses the crowd. 8-)"Listen to me please. I want you all to know that everything you have seen in my theater is an Illusion. It's a trick not real. I apologize if I have given you any false hope. My intention has only been to entertain. Nothing more."-EisenheimI hope your halloween is a good one. /cook/I guess you can never know all the stuff you might have at your own house! :lol:I LOVE this movie so much! bounce/ I saw it in 2007 for the first time and i was shocked and so happy when in the end it was all just a hoax "The Illusion" and they lived happily ever after Great points Im_convincedmjalive. Also one very weird thing is that in the movie the prince (i forgot his name) kills himself, after being accused of killing the girl. In our hoax we have this Chandler guy who killed himself. Well in our hoax it should have been CM who kills himself, but we need him for the trial. These are just some crazy thoughts in my head. Sorry...
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, it doesn’t matter anyway, because I am now officially giving up on the real murder theory; I give myself an “F”, for succeeding at “F-ailure” (I failed to prove murder). La Toya supported me when I started this thread (on 9-27-11), by tweeting that “This is definitely straight a murder trial” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}; but now she has spilled the beans, let the cat out of the bag, by saying that it’s a fake death made to look like murder—which is exactly what “The Illusionist” movie is all about {for which version of “The Illusionist”, see Anna’s good post You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}. La Toya’s statement really doesn’t even qualify as a clue; instead, it is a point-blank in-your-face wake-up alarm. By all means, do not overlook the fact that there are dozens or hundreds of major movies which La Toya could’ve referred to, with real murder plots in them, if the truth about MJ was real murder. Instead, she told us to watch the movie which ends like this: “… a montage shows Uhl putting the pieces together and discovering how Eisenheim faked Sophie's death and framed Leopold for the [fake] murder. The shot of Uhl closes with him … in realisation of the masterful illusion that has been so successfully planned & implemented.” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}. /bravo/ /woohoo/ /woohoo/ /bravo/ @TS-I am not picking your post apart since I won anyways, but I wanted to come back and respond to the info regarding the movie The Illusionist. I spent a little time looking on youtube for the movie. It seems there are bits and pieces of it uploaded but I have yet to come across the whole movie. Yesterday my daughter and I went for a walk and I was telling her about La Toya and what she said before going into court. I told my daughter that La Toya recommended that we should watch The Illusionist. I explained that I wanted to get that movie and she says mama we already have it. :shock: I said what? She says yea don't you remember you got it last year and I watched it but you didn't. I was like. bounce/ :mrgreen:I have watched the movie and it was awesome. I have some favorite parts as follows:After Sophie's death finally he (Eisenheim) emerged from his grief, bought a rundown theater, fired his manager and began preparing for a new kind of show. It is very interesting that Eisenheim fired his manager only to rehire him close to his departure. Hmm...Eisenheim always had a enthusiastic audience but now he was attracting a more impassioned following. Sounds familiar...The doctor shot the Prince up in his vein in his hand. What was the drug I wonder? The Prince wants Eisenheim arrested for fraud. After a show Eisenheim is in the police office with followers outside below. He goes to the window and addresses the crowd. 8-)"Listen to me please. I want you all to know that everything you have seen in my theater is an Illusion. It's a trick not real. I apologize if I have given you any false hope. My intention has only been to entertain. Nothing more."-EisenheimI hope your halloween is a good one. /cook/
Well, it doesn’t matter anyway, because I am now officially giving up on the real murder theory; I give myself an “F”, for succeeding at “F-ailure” (I failed to prove murder). La Toya supported me when I started this thread (on 9-27-11), by tweeting that “This is definitely straight a murder trial” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}; but now she has spilled the beans, let the cat out of the bag, by saying that it’s a fake death made to look like murder—which is exactly what “The Illusionist” movie is all about {for which version of “The Illusionist”, see Anna’s good post You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}. La Toya’s statement really doesn’t even qualify as a clue; instead, it is a point-blank in-your-face wake-up alarm. By all means, do not overlook the fact that there are dozens or hundreds of major movies which La Toya could’ve referred to, with real murder plots in them, if the truth about MJ was real murder. Instead, she told us to watch the movie which ends like this: “… a montage shows Uhl putting the pieces together and discovering how Eisenheim faked Sophie's death and framed Leopold for the [fake] murder. The shot of Uhl closes with him … in realisation of the masterful illusion that has been so successfully planned & implemented.” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}. /bravo/ /woohoo/ /woohoo/ /bravo/
That pic it´s so "spanish", like Joaquín Cortés poses!At court it was said that a person being administered for a long period intravenous stuff, the veins suffer from it and they get thinner.
Murray was there, he knows what happened. He told the truth and the truth will prevail. I just would like to listen to his version of the events soon. His "theory" is needed to finish the puzzle.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginJust one thing and I go to sleep.They said they couldn't find veins, that Michael had no good veins, but in this pic he seems to have very visible and sound veins:Of course it's a few years realier but they couldn't just vanish in the meantime. yes , michael does have veins :shock:
Regarding possible verdicts:1. Experts disagreeing = provides reasonable doubt = Murray not guilty Or: 2. Regardless of experts' opinions about who did what and how, Murray's gross negligence = guilty Or: 3. Murray takes the stand and tells what REALLY happened = MJ didn't die = not guilty!Although I favour number 3, realistically I don't expect this to happen! Number 2 is looking the most likely to me right now.I wonder though about what legally constitutes 'involuntary manslaughter'. Does Murray need to have administered the fatal dose himself for him to be guilty, or can his negligence, even if MJ did it himself, be sufficient to find him guilty?(Of course, neither MJ nor Murray administered anything fatal, just trying to go along with the plot here!)
You are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginYou are not allowed to view links. Register or LoginWell, it doesn’t matter anyway, because I am now officially giving up on the real murder theory; I give myself an “F”, for succeeding at “F-ailure” (I failed to prove murder). La Toya supported me when I started this thread (on 9-27-11), by tweeting that “This is definitely straight a murder trial” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}; but now she has spilled the beans, let the cat out of the bag, by saying that it’s a fake death made to look like murder—which is exactly what “The Illusionist” movie is all about {for which version of “The Illusionist”, see Anna’s good post You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}. La Toya’s statement really doesn’t even qualify as a clue; instead, it is a point-blank in-your-face wake-up alarm. By all means, do not overlook the fact that there are dozens or hundreds of major movies which La Toya could’ve referred to, with real murder plots in them, if the truth about MJ was real murder. Instead, she told us to watch the movie which ends like this: “… a montage shows Uhl putting the pieces together and discovering how Eisenheim faked Sophie's death and framed Leopold for the [fake] murder. The shot of Uhl closes with him … in realisation of the masterful illusion that has been so successfully planned & implemented.” {You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login; You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login}. /bravo/ /woohoo/ /woohoo/ /bravo/ @TS-I am not picking your post apart since I won anyways, but I wanted to come back and respond to the info regarding the movie The Illusionist. I spent a little time looking on youtube for the movie. It seems there are bits and pieces of it uploaded but I have yet to come across the whole movie. Yesterday my daughter and I went for a walk and I was telling her about La Toya and what she said before going into court. I told my daughter that La Toya recommended that we should watch The Illusionist. I explained that I wanted to get that movie and she says mama we already have it. :shock: I said what? She says yea don't you remember you got it last year and I watched it but you didn't. I was like. bounce/ :mrgreen:I have watched the movie and it was awesome. I have some favorite parts as follows:After Sophie's death finally he (Eisenheim) emerged from his grief, bought a rundown theater, fired his manager and began preparing for a new kind of show. It is very interesting that Eisenheim fired his manager only to rehire him close to his departure. Hmm...Eisenheim always had a enthusiastic audience but now he was attracting a more impassioned following. Sounds familiar...The doctor shot the Prince up in his vein in his hand. What was the drug I wonder? The Prince wants Eisenheim arrested for fraud. After a show Eisenheim is in the police office with followers outside below. He goes to the window and addresses the crowd. 8-)"Listen to me please. I want you all to know that everything you have seen in my theater is an Illusion. It's a trick not real. I apologize if I have given you any false hope. My intention has only been to entertain. Nothing more."-EisenheimI hope your halloween is a good one. /cook/I guess you can never know all the stuff you might have at your own house! :lol:I LOVE this movie so much! bounce/ I saw it in 2007 for the first time and i was shocked and so happy when in the end it was all just a hoax "The Illusion" and they lived happily ever after Great points Im_convincedmjalive. Also one very weird thing is that in the movie the prince (i forgot his name) kills himself, after being accused of killing the girl. In our hoax we have this Chandler guy who killed himself. Well in our hoax it should have been CM who kills himself, but we need him for the trial. These are just some crazy thoughts in my head. Sorry...hmmm I found the movie right away to watch online, usually I'm not good in finding movies online.What I thought it was interesting was when the magician finds her "dead" body in the river and starts crying and grieving, like a true actor, even though he knows very well she is not really dead. What a liar LOL!!But my main question still remains: was the doctor in the hoax or not ? (the doctor in the movie I mean). And how convenient at that time they didn't had to have an autopsy done.
@ sarahli.... you are so right. full of contradictions.... how could a verdict possibly be reached like this with all of this conflicting information. if CM is found guilty of MS (even though i believe IMO is not real trial) it just goes to show how disgusting the court system really is that a conclusive decision could be made with so much inaccurate, conflicting, confusing, so called evidence and testimonies.