Good media coverage of FBI files ITS GOOD PLEASE LOOK

Started by Leah-Kim, December 23, 2009, 12:19:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
The first post content
This is good for MJ please watch all the way till the end... Also at 3:18 see if you can hear a slip up..
Im not sure if he says when referring to what Joe Jackson said to him....... ARE THEY INVESTIGATING MICHAEL? Or WHY WERE THEY? if its one its in present tense

Heres the video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxsJrjbL ... r_embedded

  Link

the arabian nights

December 25, 2009, 06:05:40 PM #30 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I think that MJ or his estate should seek financial compensation for the malicious prosecution, loss of reputation, legal costs (which have not in total been paid as i understand it) etc.

I think that the media should now stop mentioning the false allegations every time they mention his name.


EarthSong

December 25, 2009, 06:38:28 PM #31 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

Looks like all is going according to plan, this should help with MJ's vindication! I am sure this is part of the plan, to bring Michael's reputation back, and it's working! Yay!


Ninanina

December 25, 2009, 06:56:14 PM #32 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

I can't believe Brian Oxman says he didn't know about any FBI involvement!?
In June I read on a German website, that FBI was involved in the child molestation trial and that was an old article - I think from 2006/07.

________________________________________________________
A revolution without dancing is a revolution not worth having.
________________________________________________________


fordtocarr

December 25, 2009, 07:18:47 PM #33 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

How can they prosecute when Michael is NOT dead?  They will just let it go...unsolved...inconclusive...let it die down...forget...like a lot of other celebrities have done....just sit back and wait...like Michael is doing.


the arabian nights

December 25, 2009, 07:33:44 PM #34 Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 06:00:00 PM by Guest

don't really see why his estate can't bring a civil case, the losses may not be quanitifiable at this stage, he had gone through hell, personal photographs, inspections, personal data being released, reputation ruined, his name forever it would seem linked and even now linked with the falsehoods, the media always mention it and by doing so they continue the falsehoods.

There was never any evidence. A case was pushed forward without evidence, the US is a litigious country i hear ? i just think compensation is due and well over due?


Similar topics (5)